Because we need another thread on this! In the aftermath of the Akin "illegitimate rape doesn't cause pregnancy" idiocy I saw this article quoting people who actually think he has a point:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rebeccaelliott/9-people-who-think-todd-akin-had-a-point-about-bio
This is in regards to the tenuous "scientific" claim that women exposed to the physical trauma of rape experience a biological reaction that rejects that pregnancy.
I was curious as to the scientific basis of that claim so I did a quick wiki, and although it looks like the bulk of medical evidence says the chances of conceiving are the same, there's actually, well...dispute on it. Which isn't that surprising, given the spectrum of things humans are capable of believing but I never thought the basics of...how is babby formed...would actually be something to be debated. Penis go in, baby come out is disputable?
But how widespread is this belief that women have magical self-abort-in-case-of-rape vajayjays?
And just how scientifically sound is it?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/rebeccaelliott/9-people-who-think-todd-akin-had-a-point-about-bio
This is in regards to the tenuous "scientific" claim that women exposed to the physical trauma of rape experience a biological reaction that rejects that pregnancy.
I was curious as to the scientific basis of that claim so I did a quick wiki, and although it looks like the bulk of medical evidence says the chances of conceiving are the same, there's actually, well...dispute on it. Which isn't that surprising, given the spectrum of things humans are capable of believing but I never thought the basics of...how is babby formed...would actually be something to be debated. Penis go in, baby come out is disputable?
But how widespread is this belief that women have magical self-abort-in-case-of-rape vajayjays?
And just how scientifically sound is it?