KRCummings
Uh...
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Posts
- 76,511
The judge in this case clearly changed the name due to her own religious convictions and nothing else. She even said as much. No question she was wrong.True for those under 18....post 18 though is their own bidniz and no one has to keep the name they are given.
Like when they name their baby after a religious icon?
Are you sure? Who get's to decide that? Who draws the line on when the state gets to come in and name your child for you? Where exactly do you draw it?
Celebrities? Inanimate objects? Food? Silly fantasy characters?? Hate icons? Motivational icons? WHERE?
Shoule everyone just be State ID: #ABC-11494234235....that's the only way you won't find something that offends someone else.
Oh so if it's something you don't agree with then it's ok for the state to step in and tell you not to name your kid? How is that any different than what the judge did in this case??
The line should be drawn where the name can put the child in danger. Somebody named Adolf Hitler is gonna catch more than a little shit in school and life. Somebody named Apple or Rainbow or Moon Unit not so much.