Homophobia

This thread, after reading most of the posts, makes me think that those who complain so much about political threads are two-faced. This is a political thread, no doubt about it. When references are made to political figures one way or another, at that instant it became a thread despised by all who are participating. But, because that politician was someone they despise, no one called them on it.

Well I'm here to call you on it. THIS IS A POLITICAL THREAD disguised as a discussion on sexuality, based on a study based on non-factual data.

This is a porn site...whether someone is gay shouldn't come into question here. All should be accepted for who they are, not what they are. The same goes for race and ethnic origin.

Just calling a spade a spade. (the reference here is to a shovel for all you would be racists)
 
This thread, after reading most of the posts, makes me think that those who complain so much about political threads are two-faced. This is a political thread, no doubt about it. When references are made to political figures one way or another, at that instant it became a thread despised by all who are participating. But, because that politician was someone they despise, no one called them on it.

Well I'm here to call you on it. THIS IS A POLITICAL THREAD disguised as a discussion on sexuality, based on a study based on non-factual data.

This is a porn site...whether someone is gay shouldn't come into question here. All should be accepted for who they are, not what they are. The same goes for race and ethnic origin.

Just calling a spade a spade. (the reference here is to a shovel for all you would be racists)
Well, homophobes who act out in extravagantly homosexual ways are generally right-leaning political and religious figures, male and female alike. Captains of industry, even if homophobes, aren't going to take public positions on such an issue, let alone preach homophobia. So, any discussion of homophobes as closeted homosexuals is pretty much limited in the types of public figures to use as examples.

Moreover, the ways a person's sexuality can manifest itself in his/her outside-of-the-bedroom life is a legitimate writerly topic. You know, like background character development.
 
So, post porn in it, Zeb. Here, I'll post porn for you.

Better? :cattail:

Not really...not my predilection...I have no fantasies, no hidden desire to participate or watch or write about gay male sex.

What I like is this...

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSq2kW3LpJ48VQVEKcqAlM0C9x_OcQOfcRDl1W5-xXawMrWnMM&t=1&usg=__gAUhX6z54sPaRkAHC5J7hOCt0W0=

Now if you (that all inclusive you) were just talking about the trials and tribulations of those who are gay...then fine have at it.

But the minute you start accusing a political figure of being or acting gay or that they are heartily against gays you stop talking about the plight of the gay community and start talking politics.

As I said I have noting against gays, male or female, I'm have no feelings toward another man and never have. What a man or a woman do is their business, not mine, nor the governments.

As for politicians aren't they all gay? Just like they are all liars? And power-hungry assholes who don't care about the real people except to get them to vote them endlessly into that position of power they crave?

More porn...

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlWbCeeDWXFUV1BX4_Rj53a-av3sLGskZduN6q9nZug4iP9lY&t=1&usg=__Jq7MtrqVQd_nk8uU5eVrXk1G7Ic=
 
Well, homophobes who act out in extravagantly homosexual ways are generally right-leaning political and religious figures, male and female alike. Captains of industry, even if homophobes, aren't going to take public positions on such an issue, let alone preach homophobia. So, any discussion of homophobes as closeted homosexuals is pretty much limited in the types of public figures to use as examples.

Moreover, the ways a person's sexuality can manifest itself in his/her outside-of-the-bedroom life is a legitimate writerly topic. You know, like background character development.

So why not leave the politics out of the discussion, personally I think all politicians are lairs anyway, so if they say they aren't gay I have to assume they are, even if it's not true. And even if they are and say they aren't what does it matter, they lie about everything else anyway.

So leave them out. Now, when you talk about someone who preaches against gays and he is then accused of homosexual relationships, like this asshole in Chicago Bishop whateverthefuckhisnameis, now there are the biggest asses in the world. Oh and if they just happen to have influence or the ear of politicians then we need to talk about that. Right?
 
Funny, lesbian sex scenes seem to me precisely an expression of ‘homophobia’. Isn't their purpose to allow the male viewer to watch sex without the risk of seeing another man's dick?

;)
 
Funny, lesbian sex scenes seem to me precisely an expression of ‘homophobia’. Isn't their purpose to allow the male viewer to watch sex without the risk of seeing another man's dick?

;)
LOL! :D
You know, that never occurred to me, but now that you mention it...

It's sort of like the ostensible "reason" all the porn woodsmen have large dicks, i.e., that guys want to imagine themselves with big macho dicks. I mean, I don't think I've ever wanted to imagine myself with big macho dicks. ;)
 
Funny, lesbian sex scenes seem to me precisely an expression of ‘homophobia’. Isn't their purpose to allow the male viewer to watch sex without the risk of seeing another man's dick?

;)

And here I was, thinking it was just twice as much pussy for the effort.
 
It is a nice image, but is it an image of lesbianism, or artificial re-presentation of lesbianism? Lipstick lesbian posing to sell an image aka commercial artifice over art.
There is an aura of realness, IMO. I don't know if you've heard this, but women's images-- of men, of women-- tend to showcase, out of all the body parts...

The wrist bone.

I don't know if anyone has done a serious academic study on it. But some friends of mine are creating a visual porn magazine for women, and two years of market research so far has brought that up.
 
There is an aura of realness, IMO. I don't know if you've heard this, but women's images-- of men, of women-- tend to showcase, out of all the body parts...

The wrist bone.

I don't know if anyone has done a serious academic study on it. But some friends of mine are creating a visual porn magazine for women, and two years of market research so far has brought that up.

This agrees with my experience.
 
There is an aura of realness, IMO. I don't know if you've heard this, but women's images-- of men, of women-- tend to showcase, out of all the body parts...

The wrist bone.

I don't know if anyone has done a serious academic study on it. But some friends of mine are creating a visual porn magazine for women, and two years of market research so far has brought that up.
Hmmm....
This gives the old adage, "It's all in the wrist", a whole new layer. :devil:
 
Hmmm....
This gives the old adage, "It's all in the wrist", a whole new layer. :devil:
Many women suddenly discover their voyeur side when they witness a man wristing himself!:D

It's the bone, the out-side, that gets us the most, by the way. More than the inner wrist, more than the thumb side -- the pinky side, where that bone pokes out.
 
Many women suddenly discover their voyeur side when they witness a man wristing himself!:D

It's the bone, the out-side, that gets us the most, by the way. More than the inner wrist, more than the thumb side -- the pinky side, where that bone pokes out.

Many dudes have a fascination with the abductor digiti minimi, the muscle between the pinky and wrist. It seems to be more pronounced in older men. When we shake hands it's what we feel or don't feel. A good grip and a pronounced pinky tendon will get you a step in the door of masculinity. I think the abductor digiti minimi might even connect to the bone in the wrist you're talking about, sounds like pisiform. The pisiform will be more pronounced where the ligaments and tendons are less robust, notably feminine wrists.
 
Many dudes have a fascination with the abductor digiti minimi, the muscle between the pinky and wrist. It seems to be more pronounced in older men. When we shake hands it's what we feel or don't feel. A good grip and a pronounced pinky tendon will get you a step in the door of masculinity. I think the abductor digiti minimi might even connect to the bone in the wrist you're talking about, sounds like pisiform.
I'll start doing pinky-ups regularly! ;)
The pisiform will be more pronounced where the ligaments and tendons are less robust, notably feminine wrists.
Oh now-- that is really interesting, in this context. So a man with a kinda knobbly wrist-- sexxxxy to me-- might be because a kinda knobbly wrist reads as feminine...

Big surprise, huh. ;)
 
Many dudes have a fascination with the abductor digiti minimi, the muscle between the pinky and wrist. It seems to be more pronounced in older men. When we shake hands it's what we feel or don't feel. A good grip and a pronounced pinky tendon will get you a step in the door of masculinity. I think the abductor digiti minimi might even connect to the bone in the wrist you're talking about, sounds like pisiform. The pisiform will be more pronounced where the ligaments and tendons are less robust, notably feminine wrists.

I don't know how many dudes have a fascination with the abductor digiti minimi, but until I read this post, it never crossed my mind.
 
Funny, lesbian sex scenes seem to me precisely an expression of ‘homophobia’. Isn't their purpose to allow the male viewer to watch sex without the risk of seeing another man's dick?

;)

Gee...that might be true if I didn't just love to watch, look at hetero sex too.

http://p2.xhamster.com/000/002/608/913_1000.jpg

I don't mind watching this...

http://p2.xhamster.com/000/002/586/817_1000.jpg

or this...but the reason I posted the lesbians was in response to Stella's post of the gay men. I don't have a problem with dicks in a female body...that turns me on, but dick in a male body...well it just doesn't turn me on.
 
I don't know how many dudes have a fascination with the abductor digiti minimi, but until I read this post, it never crossed my mind.
Think about it and get back to us, willya? :)
Zeb_Carter said:
or this...but the reason I posted the lesbians was in response to Stella's post of the gay men. I don't have a problem with dicks in a female body...that turns me on, but dick in a male body...well it just doesn't turn me on.
What else would I post in a thread about homophobia? :devil:
 
Funny, lesbian sex scenes seem to me precisely an expression of ‘homophobia’. Isn't their purpose to allow the male viewer to watch sex without the risk of seeing another man's dick?

;)

I really don't think that's the point. Rather, that's not the thrust of lesbian sex scenes. Wait, I mean, the meat of your argument is...No, wait, I suck at explaining...Ah! I mean...shit!
 
I really don't think that's the point. Rather, that's not the thrust of lesbian sex scenes. Wait, I mean, the meat of your argument is...No, wait, I suck at explaining...Ah! I mean...shit!

:D :kiss:
 
This thread, after reading most of the posts, makes me think that those who complain so much about political threads are two-faced. This is a political thread, no doubt about it. When references are made to political figures one way or another, at that instant it became a thread despised by all who are participating. But, because that politician was someone they despise, no one called them on it.

Well I'm here to call you on it. THIS IS A POLITICAL THREAD disguised as a discussion on sexuality, based on a study based on non-factual data.

This is a porn site...whether someone is gay shouldn't come into question here. All should be accepted for who they are, not what they are. The same goes for race and ethnic origin.

Just calling a spade a spade. (the reference here is to a shovel for all you would be racists)


It takes you awhile to catch on. The right sort of politics is okay with the Usual Suspects. Just dont remind them of November 2.
 
Back
Top