Here's your mandate.

islandman

Joined
Apr 10, 2001
Posts
66,689
Cartogram reflects votes in recent election by population density.

Time to change your sig, dim_juan. :rolleyes:



attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Cartogram reflects votes in recent election by population density.

Time to change your sig, dim_juan. :rolleyes:



attachment.php

why are the colors separated by state lines except in the midwest? or is it just hard to read?
 
It was posted several days ago. But it's by State, so it's pretty much bullshit as far as demographics.
 
This is stupid. Everyone knows that urban areas go libby. That's the whole point of BB's sigline.
 
Once again, POPULATION DENSITY.

sorry, i call bullshit.

a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.

FAIL
 
No, winner-take-all electoral college votes.

A State that's 49% red and 50% blue shows up as solid blue.

Sorry, but your "cartogram" is fairly meaningless.

I can see why you're confused.

The electoral college cart is very similar (shown below) and more pronounced.


attachment.php
 
Last edited:
sorry, i call bullshit.

a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.

FAIL

It's density, not population. This means that if Michigan and South Carolina were the same size, Michigan would appear much larger on the map. However, South Carolina is considerably smaller in area, so it is more densely populated, thereby making it larger.
 
sorry, i call bullshit.

a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.

FAIL

Are you certain?

Your eyes betrayed you in the first post.

And now this...
 
It's density, not population. This means that if Michigan and North Carolina were the same size, Michigan would appear much larger on the map. However, North Carolina is considerably smaller in area, so it is more densely populated, thereby making it larger.

that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients
 
sorry, i call bullshit.

a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.

FAIL
Not raw population. Population density.

If only Islandman had made that clear five or six more times.
 
that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients

Again, POPULATION DENSITY!!!!!!!
 
Red-purple-blue for bias.
Saturation for population density.

I will hereby refer to most of Republican America as pink state.

purple-electoral-map.jpg
 
Last edited:
that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients
This meme is destined to fail. Obama performed better among rural voters this time than last--and actually a bit worse in cities.
 
Are you certain?

Your eyes betrayed you in the first post.

And now this...

haha
dude you're just reposting some shit that you saw somewhere and that seemed impressive to you.

stand down, sister.
 
that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients

You've pretty much described the democrat's campaign strategy in a nutshell.
 
Back
Top