Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cartogram reflects votes in recent election by population density.
Time to change your sig, dim_juan.
It was posted several days ago. But it's by State, so it's pretty much bullshit as far as demographics.
Why does NJ look so fat?
Why does NJ look so fat?
Once again, POPULATION DENSITY.
No, winner-take-all electoral college votes.Once again, POPULATION DENSITY.
Thick braid.Big hair.
No, winner-take-all electoral college votes.
A State that's 49% red and 50% blue shows up as solid blue.
Sorry, but your "cartogram" is fairly meaningless.
sorry, i call bullshit.
a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.
FAIL
sorry, i call bullshit.
a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.
FAIL
It's density, not population. This means that if Michigan and North Carolina were the same size, Michigan would appear much larger on the map. However, North Carolina is considerably smaller in area, so it is more densely populated, thereby making it larger.
Not raw population. Population density.sorry, i call bullshit.
a 2 second research shows michigan as having 10 million people, south carolina having only 4. and yet on this map they're almost the same size.
FAIL
that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients
This meme is destined to fail. Obama performed better among rural voters this time than last--and actually a bit worse in cities.that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients
Are you certain?
Your eyes betrayed you in the first post.
And now this...
That map just gave me wood.Red-purple-blue for bias.
Saturation for population density.
I will hereby refer to most of Republican America as pink state.
that's even worse, actually.
since more welfare and other social-program recipients (typically democrat) are in populated cities, that gives them an unfairly huge proportion of this map, as opposed to non-social-program recipients