Has anyone posted this? Clinton rigging the DNC proof?

Probably BusyBody..But, no one made any issue of this... passed unnoticed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l15ReTxnXgE

Hillary's chicanery was well known, even before the election. I am referring now to the Dem. campaign. Her dishonesty was legendary even before then, but that's not the point of this thread.

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

http://observer.com/2015/12/dncs-glaring-favoritism-wasserman-schultz-is-untrustworthy-and-must-go/

And, whether you believe Hannity or not - and I have doubts of his veracity - those videotapes he is citing should be credible. :(
 
Hillary's chicanery was well known, even before the election. I am referring now to the Dem. campaign. Her dishonesty was legendary even before then, but that's not the point of this thread.

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

http://observer.com/2015/12/dncs-glaring-favoritism-wasserman-schultz-is-untrustworthy-and-must-go/

And, whether you believe Hannity or not - and I have doubts of his veracity - those videotapes he is citing should be credible. :(

You can tie all that to Clinton but none of the Russian stuff to 45?
 
You can tie all that to Clinton but none of the Russian stuff to 45?

I have never seen any evidence of Trump's guilt. I have no confidence in his honesty either, but he is a crooked businessman, rather than being a crooked politician.
 
I have never seen any evidence of Trump's guilt. I have no confidence in his honesty either, but he is a crooked businessman, rather than being a crooked politician.

Neither has Mueller, despite Luk's claimed clairvoyance.
 
Look, Hillary!

[failed deflection attempt]

What kind of state prosecutes the losers?
 
Wonder why it went from a “witch hunt” to “Mueller will be fair with me.”:rolleyes:
 
Neither has Mueller, despite Luk's claimed clairvoyance.

Luk's clairvoyance? Like when he saw your cowardly punk-ass show-up as "Reichguide" and I knew it could only be the diminutive vette"man"?

Like that, vette? :D:rolleyes:
 
Wonder why it went from a “witch hunt” to “Mueller will be fair with me.”:rolleyes:
What with confessions and all, it's gone a bit beyond "witch hunt" stage. That dog won't hunt any more. But FauxNewz and other Trompniks will continue the "corrupt / biased / Deep State Mueller" crap till their throats go dry. Then they'll suckle at Donny's little wang for wet sustenance, and continue.

Other possibility for de-escalating from "witch hunt": Something terrible is about to happen. to render Mueller's probe irrelevant. Watch out for nukes.
 
Wonder why it went from a “witch hunt” to “Mueller will be fair with me.”:rolleyes:

Because he probably found out Mueller doesn't have anything, and he doesn't want the (D)'s to freak out anymore than they already are.


Probably BusyBody..But, no one made any issue of this... passed unnoticed.

It's only bad when (R)'s do it.

(D)'s just loved Hillary and the DNC more for this action and will likely run Debbie Wasserman Schultz as their next "Hope and Change!!" candidate.
 
All of Botany's posts summed up nicely.


Well....all the ones regarding (D) behavior, because it's true.

Partisans will be partisan.

Or he found out Mueller has plenty.

If he found out that he would be out there calling it an outrageous witch hunt!!! And doing all he could to discredit and smear Mueller.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/282/527/5d7.jpg


The only reason Trump would say anything about an investigation into Trump that wasn't totally damning is because the investigation is positive for Trump.
 
Hillary's chicanery was well known, even before the election. I am referring now to the Dem. campaign. Her dishonesty was legendary even before then, but that's not the point of this thread.

http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/

http://observer.com/2015/12/dncs-glaring-favoritism-wasserman-schultz-is-untrustworthy-and-must-go/

And, whether you believe Hannity or not - and I have doubts of his veracity - those videotapes he is citing should be credible. :(

Hannity keeps recycling this stuff like it's news just because some Democrat is now coming around and confessing. As the links above demonstrate, this sleaze was clearly spelled out before the Democrat convention and not even Fox News made that big of a deal about it.
My own recollection was some news honcho telling his slack-jawed teammates that Wasserman-Schultz was in on it but Hillary knew nothing. And with that they returned to wardrobe to put on their cheerleading outfits for the rest of the convention.
Bernie got fucked over and his supporters here can't even get excited enough to give one half of a shit because Hillary was the one wearing the strap-on.
 
Well....all the ones regarding (D) behavior, because it's true.

Partisans will be partisan.

LMFAO! <-- did I do that right :confused:

It's true because you say it's true and that's good enough for me.
 
Well....all the ones regarding (D) behavior, because it's true.

Partisans will be partisan.



If he found out that he would be out there calling it an outrageous witch hunt!!! And doing all he could to discredit and smear Mueller.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/282/527/5d7.jpg


The only reason Trump would say anything about an investigation into Trump that wasn't totally damning is because the investigation is positive for Trump.

Or he’s fucked and better play nice. That’s what bullies do ya know.
 
Or he’s fucked and better play nice.

If he's as fucked as you're hoping why would he suddenly play nice? :confused:

Does that sound like Trump to you?

Guys like Trump don't turn around and start playing nice to people who are a threat to their power/money. They only play nice to people when it's good for them and their bidniz, otherwise fuck em'.

That's at the core of what you and the rest of the (D)'s hate about him so much is it not?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top