Gregory Dark? Do any of you women get turned on by his work?

Sparky Kronkite

Spam Eater Extraordinare'
Joined
Aug 15, 2000
Posts
8,921
I, a male, find it mostly disturbing.

Greg Dark seems like a sick fuck to me.

But then again......

I don't get most porn. It makes no sense to me.

If I made porn I would make it to 1) turn on women and 2) to do a bit for me as well.

Not of course the other way around - which is what most porn makers do.

But I am curious: Do any of you women get turned on (much/at all) by male oriented porn?
 
I find porn boring. I like erotica, but that is different. Porn is almost always male oriented, and it is boring as hell. A pair of fake tits bouncing around, a bleached blonde and an oversized cock on an ugly hairy guy. Gross. I usually get turned off by it or I laugh at it because it seems like a joke to me.
 
I have no idea who Gregory Dark is, but I do have to admit that I enjoy male-oriented porn. Of course, it also depends on my mood...



(Now I'm going to go to Morpheus to download this Gregory Dark guy... I'm curious...)
 
I like very, very little porn.

The rare stuff I like - has to be - real, or very near real.

Some amature stuff is okay. There are a couple of reels out there of real people getting caught on security cameras. And I like the Brit series 'Fuck my Wife, Please,' where real women get their fantasies provided for exchange of selling the footage. Hubby set the whole thing up and the only pros are the Director/Producer and camera folks. I saw a cool one where this fairly attractive woman confided to her husband that she had the hots for a young new male employee - a 'real' stud too. They invite him over for a meeting, he has no fucking clue. He gets there and sees the cameras and all - the Producer informs him of whats up - his jaw drops and then his pants quickly follow. Real stuff.

The only way I like porn.
 
I am a porno hound. Gregory Dark's films are great. They are beyond sex. They are art.
 
Greg Darks films are porno - first and foremost.

Sure - he attempts art - but it's all still just porno.

AND! It's my belief that 'if yer turned on by his work' - yer probably a bit tetched. Cause nobody in their right mind would actually want to duplicate what he depicts. It's some of the most 'woman demeaning' work I've ever seen.
 
Sorta like the band, "Loverboy," from back in the 80's? hehehe

(gotta go to dinner Sparx- let's pick this up later. I enjoy discussions of porno.)
 
Well? An example?

Depraved, distorted and dark 'flashbacks' - with semi-violent, hooded, death-like depiction of bondage. Spitting on females. (Sure for lubrication on occasion but - these guys miss and spit in the hair or face of the female) Hair pulling. Slapping.

Now - what ever floats yer boat. Sure, people can dig that shit. But most don't.

I surely don't get off on spitting on a girls face. Even if a partner told me she wanted me to (I'd think she was a bit weird) I would have trouble doing that.

Rought sex is one thing. Bondage 'play' is another. Talking rough during sex is another. But.......

Putting it all together - with the weird flashbacks - and never, ever deviating from that formulae?

That's fucking sick.

I mean - I don't think he calls himself Greg 'Dark' for nothing.
 
That sounds disturbing and creepy. Bondage play is fun, but people wanting to be degraded or promoting it is weird and creeps me out. Like people who want to be peed on. I can't understand that. I am not gonna say they are "wrong" it just seems unlikely that they are hooked up right.
 
Back
Top