rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,431
Because what the poorest could pay would be $0 or close too it and then where would that leave us. I am all for cutting money back on welfare and such (go get a job lazy fuckers) but I do know that I like our military to have the latest toys and you don't get that by everyone chipping in just a couple of bucks.
All well and good, but now you've opened a can of worms. You're basically saying that it's fair to expect the rich to pick up the tab for advanced military hardware.
Why should they have to pay for it?