FOX News - Masters of Foot in Mouth Disease

lavender

Cautiously Optimistic
Joined
Apr 6, 2001
Posts
25,108
Anybody heard about the statements of Brit Hume, Stuart Varney and another Fox News anchor, Brian Kilmeade, after the bombings in London? You can check it all out at www.mediamatters.org.

Can you imagine if the BBC had made statements like this about 9-11? Americans and our government would have been up in arms. You know, FOX has done some bad things in the past - but this is fucking unforgiveable.

I think all Americans should write FOX news and tell them how deplorable these statements were. This is just bullshit.

Here are some excerpts:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507070005

The following exchange between Fox News host Brian Kilmeade and Fox News business contributor and substitute host Stuart Varney occurred during breaking news coverage of the attacks on London subways and buses on the July 7 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

KILMEADE: And he [British Prime Minister Tony Blair] made the statement, clearly shaken, but clearly determined. This is his second address in the last hour. First to the people of London, and now at the G8 summit, where their topic Number 1 --believe it or not-- was global warming, the second was African aid. And that was the first time since 9-11 when they should know, and they do know now, that terrorism should be Number 1. But it's important for them all to be together. I think that works to our advantage, in the Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened.

VARNEY: It puts the Number 1 issue right back on the front burner right at the point where all these world leaders are meeting. It takes global warming off the front burner. It takes African aid off the front burner. It sticks terrorism and the fight on the war on terror, right up front all over again.

KILMEADE: Yeah.


Another:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507080005

Fox News Washington managing editor Brit Hume said that his "first thought," when he "heard there had been this attack" and saw the low futures market was "Hmmm, time to buy." From Fox News' July 7 breaking news coverage between 1 and 2 p.m. ET:

HUME: You know, the market was down. It was down yesterday, and you know, you may have had some bargain-hunting going on. I mean, my first thought when I heard -- just on a personal basis, when I heard there had been this attack and I saw the futures this morning, which were really in the tank, I thought, "Hmmm, time to buy." Others may have thought that as well. But you never know about the markets. But obviously, if the markets had behaved badly, that would obviously add to people's sense of alarm about it. But there has been a lot of reassurance coming, particularly in the way that -- partly in the way the Brits handled all this, but also in the way that officials here handled it. There seems to be no great fear that something like that is going to happen here, although there's no indication that we here had any advance warning.


And another:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507080005

Fox News host John Gibson stated one day before the attacks that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) "missed a golden opportunity" when it awarded the 2012 Olympic Games to London because if France had been selected to host the games, terrorists would "blow up Paris, and who cares?" Following the London attacks, Gibson reiterated that the IOC should have selected Paris instead of London because the British should "let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while."

From the July 6 broadcast of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, guest-hosted by Gibson:

GIBSON: By the way, just wanted to tell you people, we missed -- the International Olympic Committee missed a golden opportunity today. If they had picked France, if they had picked France instead of London, to hold the Olympics, it would have been the one time we could look forward to where we didn't worry about terrorism. They'd blow up Paris, and who cares?

From the "My Word" segment of the July 7 edition of Fox News' The Big Story With John Gibson:

GIBSON: The bombings in London: This is why I thought the Brits should let the French have the Olympics -- let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while.
 
interesting considering blair (or it might of been jack straw) said africa and the environment would still be top of the agenda for the G8 because there'd already been lengthy conferences about terrorism

(i'm paraphrasing quite a bit there)
 
sexy-girl said:
interesting considering blair (or it might of been jack straw) said africa and the environment would still be top of the agenda for the G8 because there'd already been lengthy conferences about terrorism

(i'm paraphrasing quite a bit there)


Don't you find these statements completing contemptible?
 
lavender said:
Anybody heard about the statements of Brit Hume, Stuart Varney and another Fox News anchor, Brian Kilmeade, after the bombings in London? You can check it all out at www.mediamatters.org.

Can you imagine if the BBC had made statements like this about 9-11? Americans and our government would have been up in arms. You know, FOX has done some bad things in the past - but this is fucking unforgiveable.

I think all Americans should write FOX news and tell them how deplorable these statements were. This is just bullshit.

Here are some excerpts:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507070005

The following exchange between Fox News host Brian Kilmeade and Fox News business contributor and substitute host Stuart Varney occurred during breaking news coverage of the attacks on London subways and buses on the July 7 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

KILMEADE: And he [British Prime Minister Tony Blair] made the statement, clearly shaken, but clearly determined. This is his second address in the last hour. First to the people of London, and now at the G8 summit, where their topic Number 1 --believe it or not-- was global warming, the second was African aid. And that was the first time since 9-11 when they should know, and they do know now, that terrorism should be Number 1. But it's important for them all to be together. I think that works to our advantage, in the Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened.

VARNEY: It puts the Number 1 issue right back on the front burner right at the point where all these world leaders are meeting. It takes global warming off the front burner. It takes African aid off the front burner. It sticks terrorism and the fight on the war on terror, right up front all over again.

KILMEADE: Yeah.


Another:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507080005

Fox News Washington managing editor Brit Hume said that his "first thought," when he "heard there had been this attack" and saw the low futures market was "Hmmm, time to buy." From Fox News' July 7 breaking news coverage between 1 and 2 p.m. ET:

HUME: You know, the market was down. It was down yesterday, and you know, you may have had some bargain-hunting going on. I mean, my first thought when I heard -- just on a personal basis, when I heard there had been this attack and I saw the futures this morning, which were really in the tank, I thought, "Hmmm, time to buy." Others may have thought that as well. But you never know about the markets. But obviously, if the markets had behaved badly, that would obviously add to people's sense of alarm about it. But there has been a lot of reassurance coming, particularly in the way that -- partly in the way the Brits handled all this, but also in the way that officials here handled it. There seems to be no great fear that something like that is going to happen here, although there's no indication that we here had any advance warning.


And another:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200507080005

Fox News host John Gibson stated one day before the attacks that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) "missed a golden opportunity" when it awarded the 2012 Olympic Games to London because if France had been selected to host the games, terrorists would "blow up Paris, and who cares?" Following the London attacks, Gibson reiterated that the IOC should have selected Paris instead of London because the British should "let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while."

From the July 6 broadcast of Westwood One's The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, guest-hosted by Gibson:

GIBSON: By the way, just wanted to tell you people, we missed -- the International Olympic Committee missed a golden opportunity today. If they had picked France, if they had picked France instead of London, to hold the Olympics, it would have been the one time we could look forward to where we didn't worry about terrorism. They'd blow up Paris, and who cares?

From the "My Word" segment of the July 7 edition of Fox News' The Big Story With John Gibson:

GIBSON: The bombings in London: This is why I thought the Brits should let the French have the Olympics -- let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while.

Yeah, that's about right.
 
Would these comments on Fox be more or less contemptible than Brian Williams comment comparing the Founding Fathers with terrorists?
 
I think these rank right up there C Rice's remarks about the tsunami being a great opportunity for the west.

The worst part about all of it is the 'how can we (investors) make a buck' attitude by the network.
 
Provide us a link and context, please. I have not read of this.
 
Jesus Christ people, don't deflect here. Own up to what our #1 News Network fucking said.

You all know if the UK News, or French News or any other news had said similar statements after 9/11 that we would be ranting and raving about this.

Hell, people in our nation ranted and raved when anyone even possibly suggested that our nation's actions in the Middle East created the rage that led to 9/11. And that is far less inflammatory than these flippant remarks about the fucking futures market after London experienced 4 bombings.
 
Most of the world stood solidly behind America after the 9/11 attacks. We received all sorts of assistance, support, complete support directly after 9/11. And yet, when someone else suffers - Americans do what?

And all from the network that also supports every conservative "religious" cause in the book.
 
Kilmeade is one of the more honest speaking ones of the regular weekday crew there. He blurts out stuff that everybody wishes could be taken back. Most times he's just repeating what he hears in his ear but when he's on his own he doesn't seem to consider the consequences of his words.

The weekend morning anchors are, or seem to be, honest to a fault.

The financial gang seems to have no conscience for this or their opportunistic attitudes.
 
It's all taken out of context, Lavender. For instance, the Brit Hume blurb followed a stock market update.

This was right on the money:

Failure To Deal With The Deadly Enemy
Friday, July 08, 2005
By Bill O'Reilly

The "Talking Points Memo" this evening is about sanitizing terror, failing to deal realistically with the deadly enemy. This morning, I was having breakfast in Killarney, Ireland when the terror attack news broke. My first thought was al Qaeda trying to disrupt theG-8 summit in Scotland. My second thought was now maybe Europe will wise up. The terrorists are the evildoers, not the USA.

That is probably wishful thinking. Generally speaking, the European media is viciously anti-American when it comes to the war on terror. The garbage these people are throwing out to a largely clueless public is astounding. Failed leaders like Chirac in France and Schroeder in Germany also pound home the anti-American theme to divert attention away from their own disastrous administrations.

But now the terrorists have struck again. 9/11, Madrid, today London. If all of the anti-U.S. bitterness were redirected into anti- terror bitterness, the world might defeat these savages. We all know which major countries allow terrorists to operate. Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent, Pakistan and Indonesia.

Why isn't the European press condemning those countries? Why doesn't Europe admit Saddam's regime helped terrorists all day long? Why won't the world help the struggling democracy in Iraq?

These are powerful questions. And this London terror attack should get those questions on the front burner where they belong. But don't expect the elite American media to ask them.

A few days ago, Edward Wong, a reporter for the New York Times, described Abu al Zarqawi as a "Jordanian fighter." Can you believe an American newspaper would print that? Al Zarqawi is a vicious al Qaeda killer, a man who beheads civilians and orders the murders of women and children. And the New York Times calls this guy a Jordanian fighter? That kind of sanitizing terrorism must stop! The American people, you, must demand that it stop.

The anti-American press both here and in Europe is actually helping the terrorists by diminishing their threat. "Talking Points" urges you to begin holding people accountable for their position on the terror war. Walk away from media that excuses or sanitizes these brutal acts.

USA is not the problem in this world. The terrorists are. And if you don't agree with that, you are helping killers like al Zarqawi. Enough's enough. London should be the last straw. And that's “The Memo.”
 
Does any right minded person really give a fuck what Fox "News" says?
 
Have never quite understood how "news" is part of the chanel's title. wierd.
 
I don't watch Fox all that often, but I do know every show cited is heavy on opinion, and it's not opinion disguised as reporting.
John Gibson not liking the French doesn't make him unique. I'm sure a fair amount of Americans feel the same way - a lot like the fact many French don't like the U.S. But we are supposed to be horrified when he does the politically incorrect thing and voices his opinion on a show that is all about opinions? I don't think so.
 
SeanH said:
Does any right minded person really give a fuck what Fox "News" says?

Not really, I hope.

But the fact is, FOX gets better numbers than almost any other news station. They have impacted television news and journalism more than anything in the last 5 years. They have created a revolution in our media that allowed the word journalism to become something of a misnomer.
 
lavender said:
Don't you find these statements completing contemptible?

i find it contemptible that they seem to feel we needed this to take terrorism seriously ... blairs government already does take terrorism very seriously and things like identity cards i don't think would of happened before 9/11

and i don't think what happened will change our policy hardly at all ... blair wants to show he still can focus on important issues as well as terrorism
 
sexy-girl said:
and i don't think what happened will change our policy hardly at all ... blair wants to show he still can focus on important issues as well as terrorism

Damn. I was so looking forward to seeing Blair posing under a "mission accomplished" banner.
 
Lasher said:
Damn. I was so looking forward to seeing Blair posing under a "mission accomplished" banner.
He wouldn't look right in a flying jacket.
 
Totally scummy. Urghh. I shouldn't be surprised, but urghhh. It's so deeply deeply offensive. :mad:
 
Lasher said:
Damn. I was so looking forward to seeing Blair posing under a "mission accomplished" banner.


LOL

I wonder which country would greet Britain with flowers as they invade....errr...I mean liberated.
 
lavender said:
LOL

I wonder which country would greet Britain with flowers as they invade....errr...I mean liberated.

US...but then we'd turn on him too.
 
Back
Top