Equality and STEM

[SpeareChucker]

Hmmm, looks like neither he nor you know the true meaning behind the ancient saying of "turn the other cheek". It's certainly not about being weak.

And you're, of course, speaking as a devout Christian?

One of those deplorable Trump voters?

 

[about_average]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation

How deep are you intending to go with this hole exactly?

I really hope that post is a joke.
Even the BB's, Miles and Vette aren't that stupid.

 

[about_average]

If I wanted to 'discredit' him, I'd actually bother engaging in a sustained critique of his discursive output in a public context, with proper citations and about 5,000 words of argumentation.

No you wouldn't. I learned today if you cite something it means you agree with it.

 

[about_average]

And you're, of course, speaking as a devout Christian?

I'd be willing to bet most devout Christians don't know the meaning either since it really doesn't have much to do with Christianity.

 

[about_average]

I wonder how many posters in this thread jumped on the "I'll never by Gillette products again" bandwagon because they dared suggest men not be sexual predators or bullies.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Some of us never bought that crap before and never commented upon it.



Doesn't have anything to do with Christianity? WTF?
Are you in Trumpistan or what?

Deplorable...

 

[BotanyBoy]

Quibble about semantics regarding whether I 'did' or not - I really don't care. I've given his overly simplistic argument (or at least overly simplistic as it was presented in the video that was linked earlier) about the extent of attention it warrants.

Impotent bullshitting is about what I expected.....

As a socialisation-denier and believer that everyone is able to exercise 'free will' without fetters, what I said probably won't make a great deal of sense of you, and I've got no interest getting drawn into a debate that uses those two ideological systems as it's basis.

And a bunch of smug and pompous bullshit (that's to say you're wrong) assumptions about my ideas and abilities to justify your inability back up your bullshit....yet again.

How deliciously typical of a "TRUE" feminist.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I wonder how many posters in this thread jumped on the "I'll never by Gillette products again" bandwagon because they dared suggest men not be sexual predators or bullies.

It's not that they suggest men not be.....it's that they suggest most or all men, especially the white ones are...and should be trying harder not to be.

Masculinity is TOXIC!!! Masculinity is a DISEASE!!!! Whiteness is EVIL!!!!

If we were to treat women, femininity and people of color the same way you'd be having a fucking stroke over how diabolically misogynistic and Nazi that commercial was calling for it to be declared hate speech and banned.

 

[Comshaw]

https://media.giphy.com/media/EEvX2QUOowGti/giphy.gif

FFS people.


Comshaw

 

[Bad_Doggie]

I really hope that post is a joke.
Even the BB's, Miles and Vette aren't that stupid.

I’d like to know what you think the purpose of citation is in academic work other than to avoid plagiarism, give reference for further reading and to acknowledge relevant work by the quoted author?

As such it’s not a bad way of accessing impact and relevance of an author if not the quality.

Woof!

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Yeah, that. Seriously, I could pull apart his 'gender pay gap' argument in about ten minutes.

But, as ever, you can’t be bothered, right?

I pretty much already did.

You did, let’s see……..

So his fundamental argument here is that, yes, there's a gap between the median pay of women and men, and that's not because of gender? Really? And it's there because of 'personal preference'? Really? 'Women are more agreeable than men.' - we REALLY think that's somehow biological and not something that's PART OF GENDER ... and we're just going to totally ignore the fact that apparently you have to be 'disagreeable' to earn what you're worth, and somehow imply that that's a GOOD thing? This argument is just specious. And that's basically his level of argumentation on any gender issue - the specifics vary, but it's just as equally fundamentally flawed. Which is why there's no point engaging with it.

Stunning rebuttal!

Woof!

 

[HisArpy]

Quibble about semantics regarding whether I 'did' or not - I really don't care. I've given his overly simplistic argument (or at least overly simplistic as it was presented in the video that was linked earlier) about the extent of attention it warrants.

As a socialisation-denier and believer that everyone is able to exercise 'free will' without fetters, what I said probably won't make a great deal of sense of you, and I've got no interest getting drawn into a debate that uses those two ideological systems as it's basis.

URGENT MESSAGE!

* * * * * * *

From the office of Nathalie Cabrol
Director Carl Sagan Center
SETI Institute

To all whom it may concern,

Please take note that we have updated our search catalog after extensive investigation and hereby conclude that *KimGordon67* exhibits no indications of intelligent life in that system.

Thank you

* * * * * * *

 

[BotanyBoy]

The fact that I can be polyamorous now without expecting to have the shit beaten out of me isn't 'female privilege' - it's a consequence of feminism.

That's not a consequence of feminism, that's just not dating an abusive stain.

You continue to associate being a piece of shit with masculinity.....your overt bigotry is flying strong.

So his fundamental argument here is that, yes, there's a gap between the median pay of women and men, and that's not because of gender? Really? And it's there because of 'personal preference'? Really?

Yes....really.

Women overall chose lower risk, lower paying jobs and work less hours....so you get paid less, that's how the real world works.

'Women are more agreeable than men.' - we REALLY think that's somehow biological and not something that's PART OF GENDER

It's a biological fact.....I know those really set the social constructionist who like to pretend the brain and hormones aren't real things but testosterone is real, and it has real well documented effects on human behavior, physiology and mental state.

Roid rage is real shit, hormone therapy has real effects, gender is not separate from the biological.

... and we're just going to totally ignore the fact that apparently you have to be 'disagreeable' to earn what you're worth, and somehow imply that that's a GOOD thing? This argument is just specious. And that's basically his level of argumentation on any gender issue - the specifics vary, but it's just as equally fundamentally flawed. Which is why there's no point engaging with it.

No, it's reality based on clinical research instead of biology denying theories based on the feelings of social constructionist and "true" feminist.

IIIIII know.....hormones are bullshit and the brain is just an organ that has NOTHING to do with human consciousness, psychological state, behavior or self perception.

It's all a social construct!

Psychology and biology are nothing in the face of "true" feminist feelz.

 

[Adre]

Are you challenging Query for position of Board Know-it-All?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Are you challenging Query for position of Board Know-it-All?

Nope, I just post what I post when I want to post it.

Do you have anything to add to the topic or are you just trying to white knight for the radical left wing feminist who's pretending hormones aren't real things with real effects on peoples consciousness/behavior?

 

[Adre]

Nope, I just post what I post when I want to post it.

Do you have anything to add to the topic or are you just trying to white knight for the radical left wing feminist who's pretending hormones aren't real things with real effects on peoples consciousness/behavior?

No, just asking.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No, just asking.

Cool beans bronado....how's that Nazi wagon running?

My rice rocket still has an esploded transfer case, been sitting and pissing glittery fluid into a pan for over a month now.

Fuckin' Mitsubishi.....I think I'm going back to Honda.

80's style.
https://static.carthrottle.com/workspace/uploads/posts/2015/04/crx-panda-552a70ccb858e.jpg

 

[Adre]

Purring like a well fed kitty.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Purring like a well fed kitty.

Figured as much.

Benzoz are heavy but they run just as long as an equally well cared for Honda/Yota.

My gramps got a 70's model sedan, I don't remember which model exactly or which motor but I do remember it being diesel and it being a big deal when he hit 500k miles in it. Sum' bitch ran for almost 40 years before he died and it was sold.

Probably still cruising the M'arican highways.

 

[schism666]

the freakishly tall self-made millionaire squeezes his awkward frame into a fucking crx? lololol.

 

[Adre]

Mine is 5 years old with a mere 35K on the dial. It will outlast me by a bunch.

 

[BotanyBoy]

the freakishly tall self-made millionaire squeezes his awkward frame into a fucking crx? lololol.

6-4 is hardly freakishly tall.

And Honda's for as small as they are have a lot of interior/head space.....things don't get awkward until there is a roll cage in it.

If I were to get one it would be my 5th, but I'm eye fucking EK hatchbacks too. M'aricanz will be able to legally import JDM Type R's in just a few years, might be worth the wait for the extra rare legend.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8068/8234389393_687b0591be_c.jpg

Mine is 5 years old with a mere 35K on the dial. It will outlast me by a bunch.

Yea..as long as they are maintained Benzos go the distance.

 

[KimGordon67]

Actually you can't "pull it apart" in 10 min. The issue is far too complex for some simplistic 'wave a magic wand' solution. Go back and look at the line graph in the linked story in the OP. Think about the implications for a while.

I said his argument is fundamentally flawed. I have no idea how you interpreted that as suggesting there's a simple solution.

 

[KimGordon67]

No you wouldn't. I learned today if you cite something it means you agree with it.

Ha! Of course. I forgot about that.

 

[KimGordon67]

That's not a consequence of feminism, that's just not dating an abusive stain.

You continue to associate being a piece of shit with masculinity.....your overt bigotry is flying strong.




Yes....really.

Women overall chose lower risk, lower paying jobs and work less hours....so you get paid less, that's how the real world works.



It's a biological fact.....I know those really set the social constructionist who like to pretend the brain and hormones aren't real things but testosterone is real, and it has real well documented effects on human behavior, physiology and mental state.

Roid rage is real shit, hormone therapy has real effects, gender is not separate from the biological.



No, it's reality based on clinical research instead of biology denying theories based on the feelings of social constructionist and "true" feminist.

IIIIII know.....hormones are bullshit and the brain is just an organ that has NOTHING to do with human consciousness, psychological state, behavior or self perception.

It's all a social construct!

Psychology and biology are nothing in the face of "true" feminist feelz.

Absolutely no surprises, starting with the idea that I hate masculinity and working downwards ... and you wonder why I can't be arsed engaging in any debate with you?