Equality and STEM

How long before a STEM draft is called for?
When will quotas on males be imposed and their admissions limited to 49% of students in the field.

Who here thinks China worries about any of that nonsense?

What's China got to do with it?
 
Um ... where was I trying to 'sound erudite' about Peterson? I took at a stab at what he was probably writing about, based on pretty much nothing more than what you've said, a historical knowledge of the type of 'intellectuals' you're likely to be attracted to, and and reasonable understanding of the 'men need to be men' backlash rhetoric that's circulating at the moment.

Trust me, if I wanted to sound erudite, I could do a much job at it than that.

Not from the starting point that you just elucidated...


This is why the demise of free speech, especially on the campus. Even left-wingers are beginning to notice that the asylum inmates don't take kindly to anyone who crosses their new mythologies about the true nature of woman...
 
Is that in the study?

I think it's based on Que's fieldwork at an Arizona institute of higher learning. Clearly not insider research, because apparently American universities don't let white men enrol in them any more.
 
Not from the starting point that you just elucidated...


This is why the demise of free speech, especially on the campus. Even left-wingers are beginning to notice that the asylum inmates don't take kindly to anyone who crosses their new mythologies about the true nature of woman...

If pointing out that someone's 'theory' is a load of crap is 'trampling on their free speech', then sure.
 
If pointing out that someone's 'theory' is a load of crap is 'trampling on their free speech', then sure.

Not when you admit that you knew nothing of the guy five minutes ago, but now can just dismiss him because you are guessing that he comes from outside of your sphere of thought.

You don't even care about his ideas, you go straight to a form of ad hominem attack.
 
Who's Peterson?

A bullshit artist embraced by the incels because his bollocks can be read as validating their patheticness.

And I, unlike most in this thread I'm guessing, have actually read a couple of Peterson's books. They're trash dressed up in long words. Not unlike a Drown post.
 

Yeah ... that pretty much was my original point. ButterKnifeChucker just decided to actually take my question literally. The second he did that, I actually realised who Peterson is - I'd deleted him from my recent memory because his work is such unmitigated twaddle, I didn't want it using up thinking space.
(Cue utterly predictable 'jokes' about me needing all the thinking space I can get or other suggestions that my brain is somehow atrophied.)
 
Someone's Google-foo returned predictable results. What do you expect of someone who has only prospered in life from the privileges afforded her as a white woman? Can't very well expect her to work for it, can you?

You were too late on the edit, fucknugget. Is it that time of month when the lil panty sniffer will give us a meltdown? ;)
 
Not when you admit that you knew nothing of the guy five minutes ago, but now can just dismiss him because you are guessing that he comes from outside of your sphere of thought.

You don't even care about his ideas, you go straight to a form of ad hominem attack.

That's still not trampling on free speech.
 
Yeah ... that pretty much was my original point. ButterKnifeChucker just decided to actually take my question literally. The second he did that, I actually realised who Peterson is - I'd deleted him from my recent memory because his work is such unmitigated twaddle, I didn't want it using up thinking space.
(Cue utterly predictable 'jokes' about me needing all the thinking space I can get or other suggestions that my brain is somehow atrophied.)

Chances are, he's better well known in the popular sphere for whatever YouTube videos of him happen to have gone viral. Academics, even in psychology, sociology, and philosophy, have become too specialized and professionalized for most to be familiar with Peterson. In short, few academics give a shit about his brand of tripe.
 
Not when you admit that you knew nothing of the guy five minutes ago, but now can just dismiss him because you are guessing that he comes from outside of your sphere of thought.

You don't even care about his ideas, you go straight to a form of ad hominem attack.

See here: "I going to take a punt and say that Peterson is suggesting that young men should be conforming to relatively traditional models of hegemonic masculinity, and little else - that seems to be a common death rattle these days. He didn't write that dumb-arse '10 Rules to Live By' or whatever it was called, did he?" ... where quite clearly I actually do know who he is.

And here is the definition of 'ad hominem': "(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining." (That's especially for Bot, because he's so fond of a dictionary definition.) Quite clearly I wasn't attacking Peterson - I know nothing about him personally, and I'm happy to keep it that way. I very definitely was attacking his ideas, and pretty much the ideological underpinnings of the whole 'men need to be men' sad backlash.
 
You were too late on the edit, fucknugget. Is it that time of month when the lil panty sniffer will give us a meltdown? ;)

Ah ha ha! It's cute that he thinks I give a fuck about him calling me a stupid bitch. It's a bit childish, but that's not the personal attack that ultimately pissed me off.
 
If pointing out that someone's 'theory' is a load of crap is 'trampling on their free speech', then sure.

No, trying to get someone fired, platformed, trying to ban/censor legally or just outright harassing them for disagreeing with a theory the social constructionist can't argue against however, is.

China, and other countries, are overtaking us in all sorts of STEM subjects because they put meritocracy before equality...

Equity.....the western left is more communist than the communist. :D
 
No, trying to get someone fired, platformed, trying to ban/censor legally or just outright harassing them for disagreeing with a theory the social constructionist can't argue against however, is.

:D

"Jordan Bernt Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto." (Wikipedia)
He seems to be doing OK.
 
"Jordan Bernt Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto." (Wikipedia)
He seems to be doing OK.

That doesn't mean the left hasn't been doing all they can to silence him and campaigning against free speech in general.
 
The only point I made was about your abject ignorance followed by your condescending know-it-all attitude...

;) ;)


... without doing a lick of research because, like pornography, you know it when you see it. I just handed you the rope sweetie, you tied the noose.
 
Back
Top