Election 2012; Darkness Descends on America Part Three…

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ac/Poster_for_film_%22Atlas_Shrugged_Part_II%22_(2012).png/220px-Poster_for_film_%22Atlas_Shrugged_Part_II%22_(2012).png

Atlas Shrugged: Part II

Production: $16,000,000
Earned: $3,286,255

Atlas Shrugged: Part II was not screened for critics before its release, with producer John Aglialoro questioning "the integrity of the critics." (LOL!!!)

What's in store for Part III, if it's made?

"A month before the release of Part I, Aglialoro suggested that Part III might be made into a musical..."

LOL!

(Source: wikipedia)

Liberal source.

Terror ass kisser.
 
Even in teheera you idiots call 'Robber barons', if you ever took the time to read of Stanford and Rockefeller and many more, the men who electrified the cities, the men who built the railroads andt those who took petroleum from being a medicine, to fuel for the entire world, the mines the architecture, the roads and automobiles, giants of industtry they were, peopole who brought this nation onto the worlds stage and you don't have a clue.

amicus

I find it amusing that bootstrappy Amicus lauds the men who built railroads. Railroads could not have been built with massive amounts of government-backed bonds. I'm surprised Amicus is such a fan of such government subsidies to private industry. On second thought, no, I'm not.
 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ac/Poster_for_film_%22Atlas_Shrugged_Part_II%22_(2012).png/220px-Poster_for_film_%22Atlas_Shrugged_Part_II%22_(2012).png

Atlas Shrugged: Part II

Production: $16,000,000
Earned: $3,286,255

Atlas Shrugged: Part II was not screened for critics before its release, with producer John Aglialoro questioning "the integrity of the critics." (LOL!!!)

What's in store for Part III, if it's made?

"A month before the release of Part I, Aglialoro suggested that Part III might be made into a musical..."

LOL!

(Source: wikipedia)

Maybe they were trying to copy the Producers...But then that was FICTION too

Max Bialystock is a washed up Broadway producer. Leo Bloom is a mousy PA (public accountant). When the two meet, their combined expertise points them toward the ultimate scam: Raise more money than you need for a SURE-FIRE Flop Broadway Show. No one will expect anything back and you can pocket the difference. They need the worst play to do this. They find it in the musical "Springtime for Hitler
 
Not a huge fan of Rand myself...

...but I would watch the hell out of Springtime for Hitler. Guess I'm the goddamn target demographic...
 
~~~

Naw, Marx', Lenin, Trotsky, all dead and gone and so is their legacy of human tragedy through socialism...


Oh so this socialist force in America you whine endlessly about doesn't actually exist? Senility must be a bitch, eh?
 
~~~

Naw, Marx', Lenin, Trotsky, all dead and gone and so is their legacy of human tragedy through socialism...

Rand speaks of universal truths, those axiomatic, self evident ones you can't comprehend, and thus her writings will last as long as there are people to read.

Where is your bumboy?

Rob needs you.


amicus

You do not even need Rand to have the same conclusions, from Mill to Smith to Menger...,

;) ;)

The closest thing these guys come to a philosophy is the of a hooting cohort of Gibbons...
 
Rand is also dead... and sucked on the american teat of government funded helthcare before she did so

Rand speaks of doing one thing, while hypocritically doing another

Rand will go into the dustbins of history along side Chauvin as another " prophet" that is relegated to a narrow and poorly thought out philosophy

Fallacy.

The benefits she used were paid for by her by force.

Nobody believes that people should steal anymore than they believe that if you are robbed that you should refuse the return of your property because theft is wrong in your view.

All you are doing is engaging in libel as a shortcut to actually defeating the principles of classic Liberalism as an economic and moral form.
 
Fallacy.

The benefits she used were paid for by her by force.

Nobody believes that people should steal anymore than they believe that if you are robbed that you should refuse the return of your property because theft is wrong in your view.

All you are doing is engaging in libel as a shortcut to actually defeating the principles of classic Liberalism as an economic and moral form.

Good ole AJ, eternal defender of Social Security parasites.

That....That....THAT'S DIFFERENT!
 
Fallacy.

The benefits she used were paid for by her by force.

Nobody believes that people should steal anymore than they believe that if you are robbed that you should refuse the return of your property because theft is wrong in your view.

All you are doing is engaging in libel as a shortcut to actually defeating the principles of classic Liberalism as an economic and moral form.


And when she needed her benefits she was glad they were there. She knew she'd be screwed bad without them.
 
And when she needed her benefits she was glad they were there. She knew she'd be screwed bad without them.

She smoked two packs a day for 40 years, exhausted her meager savings when she had a lung removed, and expected society to pick up the tab for her vices.

Small wonder AJ adores her so.
 
Back
Top