JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,881
Mighty oaks from little eggcorns grow
The Monitor's language columnist considers ways that words go wrong in the hands of human beings.
There must be 'eggcorns' for smut, seen any?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mighty oaks from little eggcorns grow
The Monitor's language columnist considers ways that words go wrong in the hands of human beings.
Having already made the contribution of "going on the lamb," I'll pass.
Somewhere online a guy referred to someone as getting their "cum muffins" {comeuppance}.![]()
I've seen 'trooper' for 'trouper', 'desert' for 'dessert' and 'calvary' for 'cavalry' in newspapers, magazines and books. Spell Check don't ketch 'dose 'tings.![]()
I've seen 'trooper' for 'trouper', 'desert' for 'dessert' and 'calvary' for 'cavalry' in newspapers, magazines and books. Spell Check don't ketch 'dose 'tings.![]()
My pet peeve is using "loose" when one means "lose."
Three of the most common on this site that drive me crazy:
cloths for clothes
writers who don't know the difference among peeked/peaked/piqued
writers who don't know the difference among there/their/they're
[Bonus peeve: you/your/you're, as in "put you cock in my pussy, now!"]
Yes, but sometimes, particularly in quick replies, the fingers don't follow the mind. And I find my keyboard often misses letters I've struck, too softly, obviously, and I don't notice it until after I hit the submit button.
So, I do tend to give others some slack when it's the occasional occurence.
I was speaking of published stories on Lit, Ben, not posts here on the Lit boards. Presumably, the writer proofread the work before submitting it to Lit.
I've seen a couple of long (8 or more pp) stories where cloths was used in place of clothes in every appearance; which takes that mistake out of the fumble-fingered typing arena and into questionable literacy territory.