Do you think the Official Conspiracy Theorists like tinfoil?

What do you think? Do the tinfoil hats suit them? Are they completely crazy and wrong

  • Yes - they're NUTS in tinfoil hats

    Votes: 39 88.6%
  • No - I'm wearing one too (wooohooo!)

    Votes: 5 11.4%

  • Total voters
    44
  • Poll closed .
Kennedy: One person is a target; a handful in on a conspiracy. If true they did a piss poor job and have been questioned by legitimate people ever since.

Watergate: One job; once again just a handful involved. It happened and they got caught.

Iran/Contra: Semi-large scale operation; hundreds involved (at least). They get caught.

9/11: 3000 dead; intricately plotted and executed by at least several hundred people; hundreds of people who should be dead but aren't must be hidden; families paid off to keep quiet; explosives placed without being seen while also compromising the integrity of the structure and chancing that it doesn't fall too soon; all involved have no conscience whatsoever; the event is seen by thousands and thousands of people as it happens; phone calls are faked for no reason at all (why do them in the first place?); flight recorders faked and either fool or involve the NTSB and FBI; a intentional hit on their own central command; a controlled demolition done entirely different than any other on the largest buildings in the world and for no reason at all (the planes hit, everyone saw it, why bring them down?). A large scale conspiracy executed by countless people and nobody who really matters ever questions it and no one involved ever comes forward. Uh-huh.
 
KRCummings said:
9/11: 3000 dead; intricately plotted and executed by at least several hundred people; hundreds of people who should be dead but aren't must be hidden; families paid off to keep quiet; explosives placed without being seen while also compromising the integrity of the structure and chancing that it doesn't fall too soon; all involved have no conscience whatsoever; the event is seen by thousands and thousands of people as it happens; phone calls are faked for no reason at all (why do them in the first place?); flight recorders faked and either fool or involve the NTSB and FBI; a intentional hit on their own central command; a controlled demolition done entirely different than any other on the largest buildings in the world and for no reason at all (the planes hit, everyone saw it, why bring them down?). A large scale conspiracy executed by countless people and nobody who really matters ever questions it and no one involved ever comes forward. Uh-huh.

One of the things that's I find very interesting about all of this is that the people on the nutter side of this debate(LN's various personalites, Woody) tend to be people from far away from the United States. I think, to the people who only see the big foreign policy actions of a giant superpower like the United States, the idea that the US government is capable of something even approaching that scope and scale makes sense to them.
 
NothingHitMe said:
Do you believe that one man did the 9/11 attacks all by himself?

No. Yes. Maybe. Supposedly. It's not up to me, mang!

But despite that '48 Hours' special about Marilyn Monroe earlier - I still say that she was murdered. That's the kinda irrelevent shit I care about so stop buggering me.
 
Problem Child said:
Why are you calling me a shill, fuckwad?

Because you are.



Problem Child said:
I choose to be here because it's entertaining to talk about this crap for an hour or two, sweaty swineball-licker. I am not interested in spending all my waking hours researching it, cockbag.

I also choose to be here because it's entertaining to talk about this crap for an hour or two, sweaty swineball-licker. However I know more about it then you, cockbag.

Problem Child said:
I can make a broad declaration that I choose to not to believe there was a cover-up,

I can make a broad declaration that I choose to believe there was a cover-up,



Problem Child said:
asswipe, based on the fact that credible experts aren't on the news every night saying we should be looking into this further. I don't need any links for that, douchebag, because it's my opinion.

asswipe, based on the fact that credible experts are on the news every night saying we should be looking into this further(See the show on C-span about 911 tonight, it's been on almost everynight).


Problem Child said:
I don't need any links for that, douchebag, because it's my opinion.

You need links to support your arguments, douchebag, because it's ONLY your opinion. Otherwise you say cuntguts, is a load of stinky piss just like your mother used to feed you everynight while she was jacking off with a turd.

See, I can play games of insult too.

Insults like yours are another tactic of shills.
 
Last edited:
Morcheeba said:
No. Yes. Maybe. Supposedly. It's not up to me, mang!

But despite that '48 Hours' special about Marilyn Monroe earlier - I still say that she was murdered. That's the kinda irrelevent shit I care about so stop buggering me.


distraction and attempts to go off topic. Another shill tactic.

You're another shill then.
 
NothingHitMe said:
distraction and attempts to go off topic. Another shill tactic.

You're another shill then.

Yes, Ma'am, I Am.

I've Got Shills, They're Multiplying

And I'm Losing Control...

Oh The Power You're Supplying

IT'S ELECTRIFYING!
 
KRCummings said:
Kennedy: One person is a target; a handful in on a conspiracy. If true they did a piss poor job and have been questioned by legitimate people ever since.

Watergate: One job; once again just a handful involved. It happened and they got caught.

Iran/Contra: Semi-large scale operation; hundreds involved (at least). They get caught.

yes they did.


KRCummings said:
9/11: 3000 dead; intricately plotted and executed by at least several hundred people; hundreds of people who should be dead but aren't must be hidden; families paid off to keep quiet; explosives placed without being seen while also compromising the integrity of the structure and chancing that it doesn't fall too soon; all involved have no conscience whatsoever; the event is seen by thousands and thousands of people as it happens; phone calls are faked for no reason at all (why do them in the first place?); flight recorders faked and either fool or involve the NTSB and FBI; a intentional hit on their own central command; a controlled demolition done entirely different than any other on the largest buildings in the world and for no reason at all (the planes hit, everyone saw it, why bring them down?). A large scale conspiracy executed by countless people and nobody who really matters ever questions it and no one involved ever comes forward. Uh-huh.

Yet...

That's not a good excuse. I'm sure folks were saying the same excuse about Nixon and watergate, Iran-Contra, and the WMDs in Iraq lie.
 
Morcheeba said:
Yes, Ma'am, I Am.

I've Got Shills, They're Multiplying

And I'm Losing Control...

Oh The Power You're Supplying

IT'S ELECTRIFYING!


Further distraction and attempts to go off topic. Another shill tactic.
PROVEN this time,

Why are you wearing tinfoil?
 
NothingHitMe said:
Further distraction and attempts to go off topic. Another shill tactic.
PROVEN this time,

Why are you wearing tinfoil?

You're the great big winner!
 
NothingHitMe said:
Because <snip>

Insults like yours are another tactic of shills.


You completely don't understand the difference between my broad generalization and specific claims of fact, but we'll move on. Or maybe not.

Also, plageurism is the cheapest form of comedy.

Hey, what about that missile?
 
NothingHitMe said:
Further distraction and attempts to go off topic. Another shill tactic.
PROVEN this time

You Better Shape Up
'Cuz I need a Shrill
(need a shrill)
And My Heart Is Set On YEW

*yes it is yes it is ohgoddamn yes it is
 
Is there any footage of the WTC collapse from inside the buildings? You know, where the collapse was actually happening, instead of how it looked from a few blocks away?

It's just a guess on my part, but it seems likely that the collapses would occur inside the outer walls before the outer walls started falling. Are you with me on this?

So the little puffs of smoke which appear outside the building ahead of the exterior collapse could be caused by the interior collapse, no?

If anyone can disprove this, I'd be glad to hear it. The Neoconspiracy theorists seem to make a big deal out of it, so I figure they have a few experts lined up with their alternate theories to blow mine out of the water.
 
Problem Child said:
You completely don't understand the difference between my broad generalization and specific claims of fact, but we'll move on. Or maybe not.

You completely don't understand the difference between your broad generalization and specific claims of fact supported by sources, links, and quotes from experts. That's why you keep losing the debates.

You realised politeness saved on typing then?


Problem Child said:
Also, plageurism is the cheapest form of comedy.



Problem Child said:
Hey, what about that missile?

Which missile?

I thought we were talking about a plane that's not on any recordings from 85 cameras.
 
phrodeau said:
Is there any footage of the WTC collapse from inside the buildings? You know, where the collapse was actually happening, instead of how it looked from a few blocks away?

It's just a guess on my part, but it seems likely that the collapses would occur inside the outer walls before the outer walls started falling. Are you with me on this?

So the little puffs of smoke which appear outside the building ahead of the exterior collapse could be caused by the interior collapse, no?

If anyone can disprove this, I'd be glad to hear it. The Neoconspiracy theorists seem to make a big deal out of it, so I figure they have a few experts lined up with their alternate theories to blow mine out of the water.


One of the great things about LN and her/his alts is that you're arguing against nothing. They offer no alternate theories as to what happened because that would hold them up to scrutiny. The simple fact of the matter is that none of them know anything about science, so they have to rely on discredited science that is only promoted by internet loons.
 
NothingHitMe said:
Which missile?

I thought we were talking about a plane that's not on any recordings from 85 cameras.

thank god.

You're finally coming around.

So, you've ascertained that there was a plane. This is a real breakthrough.
 
NothingHitMe said:
I thought we were talking about a plane that's not on any recordings from 85 cameras.

That hundreds of people saw hit and that reporters saw pieces of.
 
NothingHitMe said:
blah blah..


Which missile?

I thought we were talking about a plane that's not on any recordings from 85 cameras.


Good Lord, this is worse than "I know you are, but what am I".

The fucking missile which all you nuts claim hit the pentagon. Tell me about it.
 
phrodeau said:
Is there any footage of the WTC collapse from inside the buildings?

There's video footage showing the WTC controlled demolitions which looks just like any other controlled demolition. Lines of explosions, squibs, and all.

I believe my eyes, not your excuses.
 
NothingHitMe said:
There's video footage showing the WTC controlled demolitions which looks just like any other controlled demolition. Lines of explosions, squibs, and all.

I believe my eyes, not your excuses.

sorry, this post is disallowed.

We're following the New NothingHitMe rule:

NothingHitMe said:
You'll need quotes, sources, links, and you have not provided any.
 
Back
Top