Do you think Congressman Condit killed Chandra Levy?
- Thread starter Siren
- Start date
bluntforcemama
Aqua Vulva
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2000
- Posts
- 30,225
SIREN! BABY!!! YOU'RE BACK! Damn this is a GREAT day.
WriterDom
Good to the last drop
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2000
- Posts
- 20,077
I don't think he would have done it, but he could have paid to have it done which is pretty much the same thing. Perhaps, after he dumped her, she threatened to go public with some dirtier knowledge than just the affair. Usually, if someone commits suicide they don't hike into the outback where they can't be found. The disturbing thing to me is him telling the flight attendant to lie to FBI. I thought liberals only did that after they were elected President. 
Barb Dwyer
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 30, 2001
- Posts
- 939
Certain media outlets are reporting that she told her family that she had 'news'. I am wondering if she could have been pregnant.
That could be a powerful motive for a married elected representative.
That could be a powerful motive for a married elected representative.
Oliver Clozoff
SirRealism
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2000
- Posts
- 7,468
I still don't get the motive. Even if she was pregnant I can't imagine a US Representative would have her killed. Aren't there much easier and less problematic ways of covering it up? Perhaps if she was threatening to blackmail him... it just seems too Hollywood to be real, though. Then again, truth can be stranger than fiction.
From the looks of things, it sure seems like Condit's guilty of something. He's acting like a man with something big to hide. Why try to suborn perjury here? He's cancelled all kinds of public appearances. If he knows nothing, what's it all about? Something doesn't smell right.
I'm not convinced it's murder. I'd be surprised if I was wrong.
But not THAT surprised.
From the looks of things, it sure seems like Condit's guilty of something. He's acting like a man with something big to hide. Why try to suborn perjury here? He's cancelled all kinds of public appearances. If he knows nothing, what's it all about? Something doesn't smell right.
I'm not convinced it's murder. I'd be surprised if I was wrong.
But not THAT surprised.
Barb Dwyer
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 30, 2001
- Posts
- 939
Desperation drives people to do things quite out of the ordinary. But, perhaps you are right. Maybe it is the influence of too much television drama!
I just heard on tonight's news, however, that he is recanting earlier statements and has finally admitted to having an affair with her...
I just heard on tonight's news, however, that he is recanting earlier statements and has finally admitted to having an affair with her...
WELCOME BACK OMG, DCL AND SIREN IN THE SAME MONTH !!!!!
I knew if I washed my face and combed my hair something big would happen!!!!!!!
All I know for sure is that he knows more then he is saying and so whatever his role he is a cretin for not letting her family know and giving them some kind of comfort.
I knew if I washed my face and combed my hair something big would happen!!!!!!!
All I know for sure is that he knows more then he is saying and so whatever his role he is a cretin for not letting her family know and giving them some kind of comfort.
Blackbich
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2001
- Posts
- 2,564
SIREN, You're back!!!!
I'm so glad to see you, I've missed you like crazy
. Welcome back.
Okay, back to the question. I believe that Senator Condit knows more than he's telling. It would be very Hollywoodish for him to have killed her or had her killed, more likely the second scenario. I do find it suspicious that he's allegedly asking women to lie for him. There's no way to confirm that's what happened. I also find it mighty suspicious that it was after she supposedly told her aunt she had something big to tell her that she came up missing. Why didn't this information come out before? I find it hard to believe that she would not contact her family if she knew they were concerned about her BUT I know of a case where national attention was placed on a girl who was later 'found' tied to a tree. She was unable to get her story straight and after she returned home it turns out that, well, she was a little peeved at her dad when she left AND yeah, she knew they were looking for her BUT she decided not to contact them. There's no way to know the entire story but I will not be surprised if her body turns up at a later date. I'm with Barb Dwyer on this one - desperation drives people to do things quite out of the ordinary.
I'm so glad to see you, I've missed you like crazy
. Welcome back.Okay, back to the question. I believe that Senator Condit knows more than he's telling. It would be very Hollywoodish for him to have killed her or had her killed, more likely the second scenario. I do find it suspicious that he's allegedly asking women to lie for him. There's no way to confirm that's what happened. I also find it mighty suspicious that it was after she supposedly told her aunt she had something big to tell her that she came up missing. Why didn't this information come out before? I find it hard to believe that she would not contact her family if she knew they were concerned about her BUT I know of a case where national attention was placed on a girl who was later 'found' tied to a tree. She was unable to get her story straight and after she returned home it turns out that, well, she was a little peeved at her dad when she left AND yeah, she knew they were looking for her BUT she decided not to contact them. There's no way to know the entire story but I will not be surprised if her body turns up at a later date. I'm with Barb Dwyer on this one - desperation drives people to do things quite out of the ordinary.
SleepingWarrior
Egocentric Sociopath
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2001
- Posts
- 20,753
I bet he had Ted Kennedy drive her off a bridge somewhere....yes that must be it.
In an interview with police today Condit admitted that he and Levy had a "romantic" relationship. Does that mean he killed her, or had someone kill her, or wished her dead? Not necessarily. Police have said that Condit is not the only friend of Levy's that they have been questioning, and its possible that they have another suspect in mind.
People seem to think that Condit should have come clean about his relationship with Levy, should have had a press conference or something to dish out all the dirt. Why on earth would he do that? He did something tawdry, he had an affair, he betrayed his wife, and he has to answer to his wife for that. But he doesn't have to answer to US, the public. Maybe he has to answer to his constituents, but for the rest of us, it's just titillation. I think we've all done things in our relationships that we wish we hadn't done, things we'd rather not have everyone else know we did. Why shouldn't he have the same right to keep his mouth shut about it as the rest of us?
This is different than the Clinton/Lewinsky affair because Clinton said under oath that he didn't sleep with her. Condit didn't perjure himself, didn't say under oath that he hadn't had an affair. He didn't tell the truth to the police, but that isn't a crime. Heck, people lie to the police all the time, they expect it. That's why they interview people over and over again. They know people lie.
There is another reason why Condit may not be telling police the truth and why he may not have had a press conference and all that crap about the affair-- he may have something to do with her disappearance. And in that case, he'd be nuts to talk to the cops and the media. But that isn't the only reason why he's being evasive.
Did he do it? Who knows? I remember when O.J. Simpson's wife was murdered, I saw it on ESPN, and they said police were interviewing Simpson, and I thought, "Ah, no way, O.J. didn't have anything to do with it." And we all know what happened after that. So who knows? She probably didn't kill herself, because her body probably would have been found by now. She probably didn't go to Jamaica or something to hide, because she didn't seem to be in that state of mind, and because someone would've recognized her by now. So, again, who knows?
People seem to think that Condit should have come clean about his relationship with Levy, should have had a press conference or something to dish out all the dirt. Why on earth would he do that? He did something tawdry, he had an affair, he betrayed his wife, and he has to answer to his wife for that. But he doesn't have to answer to US, the public. Maybe he has to answer to his constituents, but for the rest of us, it's just titillation. I think we've all done things in our relationships that we wish we hadn't done, things we'd rather not have everyone else know we did. Why shouldn't he have the same right to keep his mouth shut about it as the rest of us?
This is different than the Clinton/Lewinsky affair because Clinton said under oath that he didn't sleep with her. Condit didn't perjure himself, didn't say under oath that he hadn't had an affair. He didn't tell the truth to the police, but that isn't a crime. Heck, people lie to the police all the time, they expect it. That's why they interview people over and over again. They know people lie.
There is another reason why Condit may not be telling police the truth and why he may not have had a press conference and all that crap about the affair-- he may have something to do with her disappearance. And in that case, he'd be nuts to talk to the cops and the media. But that isn't the only reason why he's being evasive.
Did he do it? Who knows? I remember when O.J. Simpson's wife was murdered, I saw it on ESPN, and they said police were interviewing Simpson, and I thought, "Ah, no way, O.J. didn't have anything to do with it." And we all know what happened after that. So who knows? She probably didn't kill herself, because her body probably would have been found by now. She probably didn't go to Jamaica or something to hide, because she didn't seem to be in that state of mind, and because someone would've recognized her by now. So, again, who knows?
WriterDom
Good to the last drop
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2000
- Posts
- 20,077
christo said:
If he was just playing hide the pickle with her and the press was hounding him, then sure, he has every right to keep his mouth shut. But the girl has been missing for a month, and the indications I get is that he has been more of a hindrance than a help.
Andra_Jenny
Mentally Divergent
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Posts
- 2,865
Innocent until proven guilty. but he hindered an important investigation and should have to answer for that in some small way. He has done everything wrong from a public perception aspect.
The behavior, is self-destructive. HOw can a man have serial mistresses and not expect the news to eventually get out.
On another note, as I have pointed out to the Democrats before, the newspapers are turning terribly tabloid or pulling more towards the center due to financial concerns, and the Democrats are by design, almost bound to always have the juciest scandals.
Which is why I surmise the Democratic Party will soon find themselves with an uphill battle, the king the conservatives have been waging.
The behavior, is self-destructive. HOw can a man have serial mistresses and not expect the news to eventually get out.
On another note, as I have pointed out to the Democrats before, the newspapers are turning terribly tabloid or pulling more towards the center due to financial concerns, and the Democrats are by design, almost bound to always have the juciest scandals.
Which is why I surmise the Democratic Party will soon find themselves with an uphill battle, the king the conservatives have been waging.
Similar threads
