Do the French mean business?

I have seen proposals for dealing with ISIL by erasing their cities. If your town supports ISIL, your town will be obliterated. No warning. No boots on the ground. No tank columns moving slowly across the landscape. No attempt to gain and hold territory. Merely erasure.

Extend this to an Israeli-style program. If your mosque, or church, or temple, features hate-preaching teachers, it will be bulldozed. If terrorists use your holy site (any faith) for recruitment or training, it will be bulldozed. That includes racist and anti-abortion and sexist terrorists. If your creed supports violence, your infrastructure will be eliminated. If you want to keep your holy sites, expunge the recruiters, the trainers, the proselytizers. If you don't, suffer the consequences.

Is this a free speech issue? Should haters spew hate indiscriminately? The old SCOTUS ruling that "Free speech does not protect yelling FIRE in a crowded theater" and laws about incitement to riot etc seem to apply.

Let's apply this to talk radio, too.

Discuss.
 
Who or what is Hollande? Why are the Dutch asking for help? Russia shot down that Dutch jet. Doubt Dutch talking to Russia much.

So what has "Hollande" got to do with Paris attacks and ISIL?
Go to Google News. Type "Hollande" into the search box. Read and learn. Really. Read the news coverage. Find out who is involved. Asking such questions here should embarrass you.
 
I have seen proposals for dealing with ISIL by erasing their cities. If your town supports ISIL, your town will be obliterated. No warning. No boots on the ground. No tank columns moving slowly across the landscape. No attempt to gain and hold territory. Merely erasure.

...

Even in territory DAESH hold, they are outnumbered by non-combatants.

Erasing their cities? What cities? Many of the towns held by DAESH are already piles of rubble.

This suggestion raises the spectres of Lidice and Oradour-sur-Glane.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oradour-sur-Glane
 
More ignorance?

We had a King during WW2. The Guards served with distinction in several theatres of war. The Household Cavalry didn't wear their shiny breastplates. They used tanks.


Oh, this is rich, watching JBJ try to denigrate your life experiences.

In his version of reality, he and his family have formed the very backbone of Western civilization.

Nobody has ever had such an inflated sense of their own importance, or woven a tapestry of such utter bullshit.
 
Even in territory DAESH hold, they are outnumbered by non-combatants.

Erasing their cities? What cities? Many of the towns held by DAESH are already piles of rubble.

This suggestion raises the spectres of Lidice and Oradour-sur-Glane.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oradour-sur-Glane

Exactly!

If we become as bad as our enemy, there goes ANY moral high ground. War is hell and oft times calls for a whole lot of killing but reprisal raids on unsuspecting villagers?! Russians tried that in Afghanistan, didn't work! Churchill accompanied reprisal attacks into the Swat Valley. Won't catch me in the Swat Valley anytime soon! I dare you to send an SF team there! Over 100 years ago didn't bloody work.

May make you feel good but has no military benefit. Unless you wish to commit genocide across the ME won't even work.

Would any of us cave in to such tactics? I doubt it very much.
 
'Humane' and 'limited' wars no longer exist, haven't since Napoleon's day. All wars are total. All populations are targets. 'Justification' is a joke. A defensive war is 'just' but since the best defense is a strong offense we can expect many preemptory attacks in the name of national security. People in war zones are in deep shit. Welcome to the New World Order.
 
Back
Top