Dirty Politics

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
The voting results from New York City reveal that Obama seems to have gotten a short count. The discrepancies are chalked up to 'human error.' Yeah, right. Comment?

OBAMA ROBBED IN NY

February 16, 2008 -- Barack Obama's primary-night results were strikingly under recorded in several congressional districts around New York City - in some cases leaving him with zero votes when, in fact, he had pulled in hundreds, the Board of Elections said today

Unofficial primary results gave Obama no votes in nearly 80 districts, including Harlem's 94th and other historically black areas - but many of those initial tallies proved to be wildly off the mark, the Board of Elections confirmed.

Truth is, in some districts getting a recount, the senator from Illinois is even close to defeating Hillary Clinton.

Initial results in the 94th District, for example, showed a 141-0 sweep for the New York senator, but Board of Elections spokeswoman Valerie Vazquez said today that the ongoing recount had changed the tally to 261-136.

As yet, none of the results has been certified, Vazquez said, adding that the Board of Elections had begun a painstaking ballot-by-ballot canvassing of all voting machines four days after the Feb. 5 election.

"We are doing a recanvass, and we will be counting all paper ballots, including absentee ones," Vazquez said.

"Some initial tallies had zeros, but it was most likely due to human error. Those were unofficial numbers, and no confirmed results have been released yet."

As yet, none of the results have been certified, but a ballot-by-ballot canvassing of all voting machines has begun, a board spokesperson said. Many of the mistakes were chalked up to human error -- and some Clinton tallies were wrong as well. In several congressional districts she was shown as having received votes when in fact she got hundreds, Boe said.

In a predominantly black Brooklyn district for which Clinton was given credit for a 118-0 victory on Primary Night, the Board of Elections' latest figures indicate that she may not even come out the winner - Obama currently has 116 votes to her 118.
 
Sounds like every election held in Chicago for a hundred or so years :rolleyes:


What you expect an honest election? :rolleyes:
 
Sounds like every election held in Chicago for a hundred or so years :rolleyes:


What you expect an honest election? :rolleyes:

Obama won IL by a big margin. I wonder how much it really was. One of my favorite political quotes went something like: "When an election gets stolen in Chicago it stays stolen" in reference to the 1960 presidential election. :eek:

ETA: Saying "Dirty politics" is something like saying "crooked politician" or "fat lard" or "wet water".
 
Last edited:
Sounds like every election held in Chicago for a hundred or so years :rolleyes:


What you expect an honest election? :rolleyes:

No, but I expect the cheaters to at least have the intelligence to avoid showing a black candidate getting zero votes in a heavily black area.
 
Obama won IL by a big margin. I wonder how much it really was. One of my favorite political quotes went something like: "When an election gets stolen in Chicago it stays stolen" in reference to the 1960 presidential election. :eek:

Yes, Chicago politics is notorius. Just because you're dead in Chicago doesn't mean that you don't still vote.
 
Back
Top