Everything the Pubs do to block access to the polls

Politruk

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
4,960
Voter ID laws, voter-roll purges, shutting down polling stations in poor/black neighborhoods -- ALL of it reflects their own declining confidence in their ability to win elections fairly, by convincing a majority of the public of the value of their politics and policies.

Note that this is entirely one-sided. The Dems are doing nothing at all to come between R-leaning demographic groups and the polls.

N.B.: All of it is also a solution to a non-problem. Election fraud is one subject where there is NO POSSIBILITY WHATSOEVER that the Pubs are right, or even have any points worth considering.

Only two forms of election fraud are possible. One is in-person fraud -- a legally ineligible person voting. And THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN. A particular instance does come up very occasionally, but never on a scale that could possibly change the outcome of any election. The Pubs have been trying for decades now to find some evidence to the contrary and they always fail -- the W Admin even fired several U.S Attorneys because they failed. Rick Wilson, one of the founders of the Lincoln Project, recounted in one of his books that True the Vote tried to hire his political consulting firm -- he researched the matter and decided he couldn't take their money, because he would have nothing to work with -- he could find no evidence at all, anywhere, that True the Vote's complaints about voter fraud had any grounding in reality.

The other form is ballot-box stuffing. Counting the votes dishonestly. That's a form of fraud you cannot pull off without help INSIDE the elections office. Which means you cannot do it on any large scale. The American election system is hyperfederalized -- it is run at the county level, and even a state Secretary of State has almost no control over the process. To cheat in a presidential election in that way, you would have to recruit help inside 3,000+ county election offices, or at least some significant fraction of that number; and do it without anybody in any of those offices blowing the whistle. It can't be done.

A good source here is The Voting Wars, by Richard Hasen, who is an elections lawyer (and no, you are not surprised to find out that is an actual legal specialty).
 
Last edited:
Voter ID laws, voter-roll purges, shutting down polling stations in poor/black neighborhoods -- ALL of it reflects their own declining confidence in their ability to win elections fairly, by convincing a majority of the public of the value of their politics and policies.
I notice that nobody has contradicted this.
 
Only two forms of election fraud are possible. One is in-person fraud -- a legally ineligible person voting. And THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN. A particular instance does come up very occasionally, but never on a scale that could possibly change the outcome of any election. The Pubs have been trying for decades now to find some evidence to the contrary and they always fail -- the W Admin even fired several U.S Attorneys because they failed. Rick Wilson, one of the founders of the Lincoln Project, recounted in one of his books that True the Vote tried to hire his political consulting firm -- he researched the matter and decided he couldn't take their money, because he would have nothing to work with -- he could find no evidence at all, anywhere, that True the Vote's complaints about voter fraud had any grounding in reality.

The other form is ballot-box stuffing. Counting the votes dishonestly. That's a form of fraud you cannot pull off without help INSIDE the elections office. Which means you cannot do it on any large scale. The American election system is hyperfederalized -- it is run at the county level, and even a state Secretary of State has almost no control over the process. To cheat in a presidential election in that way, you would have to recruit help inside 3,000+ county election offices, or at least some significant fraction of that number; and do it without anybody in any of those offices blowing the whistle. It can't be done.
And nobody has contradicted any of this, either.
 
Hurricane damage could make many people unable to vote in the reddest counties of swing states Georgia and North Carolina. Repairs will take years, if they're ever done. Biden's handlers could direct FEMA and other agencies to slow walk that process because fuck 'em, they're Pubs. But that is being watched by everyone. Bush's Katrina response finally sank his public approval rating.
Indeed -- they didn't really think this through before they deployed the weather machine.
 
When all else fails ? Just don’t certify some of those crazy blue city impossible numbers
 
Funny how the Biden administration is suddenly suing the governor of Virginia for enforcing the law that requires non citizens to be removed from the voter rolls and was signed by former Democratic governor Tim Kaine 18 years ago.
The Biden Administration is not suing. The Department of Justice is suing. Maybe Trump thinks every federal agency is the president's instrument, but Dems know better.
 
The Biden Administration is not suing. The Department of Justice is suing. Maybe Trump thinks every federal agency is the president's instrument, but Dems know better.
The DOJ falls under the Executive Branch. Biden is still the president, despite widespread concerns about his fitness. The Attorney General was appointed by the president and reports to the president.
 
The DOJ falls under the Executive Branch. Biden is still the president, despite widespread concerns about his fitness. The Attorney General was appointed by the president and reports to the president.
That does not place him at the president's command. Every federal agency but the Defense Department has some recognized degree of political independence. There is no "unitary executive" in the sense the Pubs insisted there was in the W years.
 



good news :)
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen’s attempted purge of supposed non-U.S. citizens violates the law.

District Judge Anna Manasco’s decision followed Allen’s announcement that he was removing over 3,200 people from the state’s voter rolls on Aug. 13. Under the National Voter Registration Act, states are prohibited from removing voters from the rolls during a 90-day “quiet period” prior to an election.

Allen “blew the deadline when he announced a purge program to begin eighty-four days before the 2024 General Election,” Manasco’s decision states.

While Allen’s purge order purported to target noncitizens, at least 22% of the people removed from the voter rolls were actually U.S. citizens. In the Justice Department lawsuit, lawyers noted that more than 700 people targeted by the purge re-registered — a sign that they were citizens all along — after Allen ordered their registrations to be deactivated. These citizens were not only purged from the rolls but referred to the state attorney general for prosecution.
:mad:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=08d07c118c4042e7aae6694d697d0dc9&ei=142
 
People with felony records can now vote in Nebraska

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska’s top election official had no authority to strip voting rights from people convicted of a felony, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in a decision that could add hundreds of new voters to the rolls and potentially help tip the balance on Nov. 5.

The order by Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen could have kept 7,000 or more Nebraskans from voting in the upcoming election, the American Civil Liberties Union said. Many reside in Nebraska’s Omaha-centered 2nd Congressional District, where both the presidency and the makeup of Congress could be at stake.
In July, Evnen had ordered county election officials to reject voter registrations from those with felony convictions, citing an opinion from the state attorney general. That opinion, which Evnen had requested, deemed as unconstitutional a law passed this year by the Legislature immediately restoring the voting rights of those who complete the terms of their felony sentences.

Miller-Lerman disagreed in a scathing retort, saying that to find the laws unconstitutional could disenfranchise 59,000 Nebraska residents who have been eligible to vote since the 2005 law passed and that such a finding would consolidate power in the executive branch.

this is about restoring voting rights to people who have served their convictions and, despite being a heavily republican state, Nebraska's electoral vote is split and has seen votes awarded to both Obama and Biden.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=08d07c118c4042e7aae6694d697d0dc9&ei=271
 
Good news!

Not that Alabama is going to go for Harris even with these voters restored to the rolls.
i know, but there may be some reflection down-ballot... but, more importantly, it rights the wrong of disenfranchisement and that can only be seen as a good thing in a democratic process.
 
Back
Top