cym! I have a question for you, oh sexpert.

[bluntforcemama]

I canNOT find my G spot. Are you sure every chickadee has one?

 

[Bob Peale]

I'm not Cym, but I play one on TV...

Seriously Myst, take a look here http://doctorg.com/sexual_studies.htm it might help.

And for the record, I've never been with someone who hasn't had one, but sometime's it's taken a lot of work to find it.

 

[April]

Bob, you should rent yourself out to women who can't find their G-spot! I'll let Myst be the first in line, but I'm next!

Hey, no shoving! Back off! Wait yer turn!!

 

[Bob Peale]

Just doing my part

 

[Omni]

Reply

Oh! Oh! Oh! Have any of you see the porn flick Deep Throat? Linda had her's in the back of her throat. Ohmygod!

Omni

 

[cymbidia]

Darlin', it's part of our anatomy, like our tonsils or our toes.
You have one.

The instructions for finding it are for that mythical "average" woman. None of us are her, we already know that, right? Therefore, we have to dig around a little, sometimes, in order to find it IF it's become important to us that we do that.

Please know this: you don't have to know where it is, it need never be touched in any manner, for you to have a wildly fulfilling sexual life, okay? It's just alittle added bonus, just another choice in the game of bodies and pleasure. It's NOT a requirement.

Relax.
You're too tense about this, babes.
You've been tense about it off anf on for a couple months, too, since at least the time we had the last G-spot thread going.

Okay, let's go back over the basics, shall we?
Here's the thread, just for ref purposes: http://www.literotica.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=36750&highlight=Gspot

From that thread:
The G-spot is a bean shaped mass of nerve tissue located about halfway between the back of the pubic bone and the top of the cervix, and is the focal point of female sexual arousal.

The size and location of the G-spot varies from woman to woman, but it's usually about the size of a quarter, and lies two to three inches inside the vagina directly behind the pubic bone. To stimulate it, you press lightly and use a "come hither" motion with your fingers. Some women have a feeling of needing to pee but that usually passes.

Also from that thread:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Myst
I want a G-spot orgasm! I really don't think I have one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes you do, darlin, you have a G-spot.

First off, don't freak out. Some women really don't notice *that* much of a sensation difference between G-spot stimulation and regular clitoral stimulation. If you normally have a really sensitive clit, if you can just barely touch it and your whole body is immediately in overdrive, then maybe your G-spot is something equivalent and you simply don't notice a huge difference.

However, let's check, okay?

1. Lie on your back, knees up a little, comfortably parted.
2. Feel inside your vagina about 2" - 4" (you can probably reach it with a finger, if not, use one of those dildoes/vibrators with the gently curved tips).
3. It'll be up on the bellybutton side of your vaginal canal, not down toward your back.
4. It "feels" different to the touch, just a spongy sort of mass of tissue - and you whole body will probably go WOW!!! when you find it.
5. If you don't find it right away, just keep checking. Don't obsess: you have a G-spot, babes. It's like fallopian tubes or egg follicles; we *all* have them. Yours might be situated a little differently than most. Not everyone's G-spot is precisely where the books say it ought to be. Just check for it, don't obsess, get a friend to help maybe.

~~~~~~~~~
Have you done all this stuff, Myst?

 

[Silverlily]

Have you done all this stuff, Myst?

And did you take pictures? (Thought I'd beat miles or kgboot to it ).

Good lord woman! Do you know how to describe things. *whew*

 

[cymbidia]

Good lord woman! Do you know how to describe things. *whew*

That's why they pay me the big bucks to teach 13 and 14 year olds what their fallopian tubes are for and why sedimentation is important to the process of fossilization, darlin'.

 

[Bob Peale]

That's why they pay me the big bucks to teach 13 and 14 year olds what their fallopian tubes are for and why sedimentation is important to the process of fossilization, darlin'.

Cym,

Promise me you will NEVER combine those two concepts in the same sentence again!

 

[Azwed]

Ughh i was just working on some Geology when I read that. Way too much of a sex geology overload at once. My head feels all light and funny now. I think I may need medical attention.

 

[miles]

Omni

No Omni. Her clit was in her throat.

Can you imagine the possibilities?

 

[Gilly Bean]

I canNOT find my G spot. Are you sure every chickadee has one?

You are not alone.....

Ok, that's not entirly true. I know where it is. I think I have felt it a few times. But nothing happens. Am I broked?

 

[Cirrus]

Myst, you might be like me. I have one, I know where it is, and I really couldn't care less. It just doesn't really do anything for me to be touched there, by myself or anyone else. It feels kind of weird, actually.

 

[bluntforcemama]

Can't feel a darn thing... and nothing out of the ordinary! But thanks for the wildly erotic lecture! I'll keep working on it, hopefully Juspar can find it more easily than I can.

 

[Angel]

Can't feel a darn thing... and nothing out of the ordinary! But thanks for the wildly erotic lecture! I'll keep working on it, hopefully Juspar can find it more easily than I can.

 

[cymbidia]

some topical g-spot info i came across

From a really good site called All About My Vagina, the section on g-spots (http://www.myvag.net/gspot.shtml):

"More people are probably interested in the orgasmic functioning of the g-spot than in all that. The urethral sponge tissue does a number of orgasm-related things, which seem to vary for each female and may be unremarkable in some."

So, darlin ...
maybe you really don't have much to find there.

~shrug~
No big deal, either.
If sex is good and sex is fun and then who cares what spot is getting pressed, hmmm?

 

[sigh]

That's why they pay me the big bucks to teach 13 and 14 year olds what their fallopian tubes are for and why sedimentation is important to the process of fossilization, darlin'.

i can't help it...i have to ask:

why IS sedimentation important to the process of fossiization?

(and you'll have to define both terms...sorry)

oh...wait wait wait...we're not talking sex anymore are we? lol...okay, i get it...nevermind

sheesh, i'm such an airhead

 

[Never]

Too late sigh, you've asked, she's bound to tell you now. She's like Wonder Woman, I think it's part of her Code of Honor or somethin'.

 

[Oliver Clozoff]

Darlin', it's part of our anatomy, like our tonsils or our toes.
You have one...

The G-spot is a bean shaped mass of nerve tissue located about halfway between the back of the pubic bone and the top of the cervix, and is the focal point of female sexual arousal.

I realize that openly questioning the physical reality of the G-spot on an internet sex bulletin board is like trying to argue against the existence of God at a Pentocostal preachers' convention, but I guess I'm in a masochistic mood, so what the hell?

I wouldn't go so far as to say the G-spot is a fiction, because as they say, 50 million Elvis fans can't be wrong. If so many women experience a "pleasure spot" inside their vaginas, there must be something to it, right? I can't really argue against that. If it works for you, who am I to tell you it's not "real".

At the same time, though, there's a great deal of misinformation being spread about the G-spot. A thorough review of all the serious anatomical and medical literature will show that there's never been any confirmation of any kind of anatomical structure that would be responsible for its existence. Contrary to what Cym's post above reports, there has never been found "a bean-shaped mass of nerve tissue" or any other nerve structures that could from what we know about the physiology of human sexual response be responsible for the pleasure created by G-spot stimulation. All of our physical sensations are created by nerve action potentials. It's inconceivable that there could sensation in the absence of nerves. We find that nerves are actually very diffuse in the vagina without any localized masses. Ergo, no physical G-spot. As far as science is concerned the existence of the G-spot is as speculative as the existence of God.

Then why do millions of women swear by it? I really don't know. I surmise that since it's said to be along the anterior wall of the vagina, what's happening is that the clit is getting stimulated from the "back side", giving a different sensation. Of course, it's also possible that the nerves really are there and that we just haven't found them yet. I suppose that's possible, but I think it unlikely.

In the end, it doesn't matter whether it's "really" there or not, though, right? If it gives you orgasms, it's a useful thing to believe in. Even if you never find it, though, it's pretty fun just to look.

 

[cymbidia]

perhaps so, perhaps not

Again, from the g-spots section of the site All About My Vagina (http://www.myvag.net/gspot.shtml)

The spot itself is commonly known (ie: by women's magazines) to be a bean-shaped area on the front wall of the vagina, about 4cm (1.5 inches) above the opening. Dr. G figured out that it is not a spot on the vaginal wall at all, but a collection of tissues that can be felt through it. There is still some debate about the actual composition of the spot and which blood vessels and nerves and things are involved.

It is known that the main component of the g-spot is the urethral sponge tissue, which surrounds the female urethra and which swells during sexual arousal. When swollen, this tissue can, in some women, be felt and stimulated through the vaginal wall in the area described as the g-spot.

<snip>

The tissue swells during arousal. This may stimulate nerves in the area, and may also involve the internal portions of the clitoris. So the swelling of the tissue can produce pleasant sensations. Stimulating the tissue, commonly by pressing it through the vaginal wall, can further stimulate it and do some other things. I didn't get that far in the book (I was in the middle of a party). I will research more; this is much fun.

Stimulation of the g-spot may also induce the ejaculation of fluid from the urethra. The book referred to this as a small amount, and stated that while it was uncertain how much of the fluid came from the bladder and how much came from other tissues, the liquid was determined to be chemically different than urine. So stimulating the g-spot does not make a woman pee.

~~~~~
All i really know is that there exists a sweet spot inside my vagina, a particular area that is different than the surrounding tissure in terms of what i feel when it's pressed. When it's stimulated, i almost always orgasm very intensely. Whatever name you want to slap on it, it's definitely there.

 

[BlondGirl]

<<<"
Then why do millions of women swear by it? I really don't know. I surmise that since it's said to be along the anterior wall of the vagina, what's happening is that the clit is getting stimulated from the "back side",
">>>

When, in cadaver studies, the clitoris is excised, the normally visible part is only the "tip of the iceberg", so to speak. (What you see on your lover or yourself is maybe 1/20th of the entire thing--and yes, it does extend back, sort of folded--in the shape of your fingers when you stick your thumb between the webbing of your index and middle fingers with your thumb peeking through--that is the typical comparison.)

I, personally, enjoy having attention given to my vagina and the front does feel different from the back to me, but it is simply another sensation that I enjoy during sex play--not unlike nipple stimulation. Could I cum from it? If I was aroused enough, I could cum from anything.

 

[BlondGirl]

<<<"
Stimulation of the g-spot may also induce the ejaculation of fluid from the urethra. The book referred to this as a small amount, and stated that while it was uncertain how much of the fluid came from the bladder and how much came from other tissues, the liquid was determined to be chemically different than urine. So stimulating the g-spot does not make a woman pee.
">>>

The fluid is typically chemically comprable to prostate fluid and in women who ejaculate, there is often an extra organ that is similar to the prostate----those lucky semi-androgynous types!!! (The fluid is excreted through the urethra. If it is coming from the vagina, it is NOT her ejaculate--it is simply either her own lubrications or her partner's ejaculate.)

You folks have got to take a college level course in human sexuality complete with the videos, lectures, diagrams, discussions, models, and of course, the tests--to make sure you are retaining all the useful information!!!!! If you can get to a gross anatomy lab, that is even better for understanding what really occurs other than the bullshit you hear and read.
(It has affected things about how I parent my child too.) It is one college course that I have got to say has been worth every dime.

 

[bluntforcemama]

Well, BlondGirl, when I'm a cadaver, I'll donate my body to you.

 

[BlondGirl]

Very graphic description--don't read if you are squeemish!

Thanks, but no thanks. I got MORE than I needed in college. It was awful for me emotionally--many of the specimens that were preserved were taken of people who died during the event. (ie-labor--there was one of the baby just past crowing--obviously that is when the mother died--I hope they did not let the baby die for the purpose of the specimin--it was perfect--placenta was displayed in the giant jar too with the ueterus sliced and labled to show the various parts of the anatomy and its changes in labor. Of the mother, there was maybe 6 inches of her thighs and her pelvic bones with her external genitalia intact with her internal vicera on display with the baby. Very haunting--gave me nighmares for months.)
If I never ever see another gross anatomy lab display like that one again, it will be all too soon.
The regular cadavers were fine--the jars of the parts were horrible--most were from the 1800's and had the person's name and cause of death and often their occupation. It was very difficult.

 

[bluntforcemama]

Call it morbid curiousity, but that probably would have been fascinating to me, too, even if it was terribly sad.