Peregrinator
Hooded On A Hill
- Joined
- May 27, 2004
- Posts
- 89,482
There might be a majority? Are you fucking kidding me? On evolution?
Thank you. Holy shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There might be a majority? Are you fucking kidding me? On evolution?
Genesis 2:4-9 Adam was created before any plants.
Simple fact of the matter is this...
Whether we think something did or didn't happen, or if we behoove something exists or doesn't, that is irrelevant to whether it did, our does.
Something can either exist in this universe or it can't. No amount of belted OS going to change that simple fact.
i just realized that i have replied in this thread without voting on the poll. lol

You understood that well enough comment with something more thanI'm bloody damned impressed.
You understood that well enough comment with something more thanI'm bloody damned impressed.
Adam had the granddaddy of all honkers. There was nothing modest about his private parts.This is inaccurate. Adam needed plants to cover his modest private parts and for bedding. Plus The Bible describes how he made salads, tea and vegetarian entrees.
God made plants available to Adam though maybe the rest of Earth was barren. I don't know.
Adam had the granddaddy of all honkers. There was nothing modest about his private parts.
He might have needed leaves to cover his head when he prayed, but the rest of him was free to the breeze.
This is inaccurate. Adam needed plants to cover his modest private parts and for bedding. Plus The Bible describes how he made salads, tea and vegetarian entrees.
God made plants available to Adam though maybe the rest of Earth was barren. I don't know.
Except Adam wasn't covering up. How the hell did I miss this? Adam got to rock out with his cock out for an undetermined amount of time.
Much of what we think we know about Adam comes from interpretation of Renaissance-era painters. In reality we don't know much about Adam's life but since he was a Christian man it's reasonable to assume he did not "rock out with his cock out".
With all the new animals on Earth it would have been dangerous to expose genitilia to unpredictable, wild creatures.
Much of what we think we know about Adam comes from interpretation of Renaissance-era painters. In reality we don't know much about Adam's life but since he was a Christian man it's reasonable to assume he did not "rock out with his cock out".
With all the new animals on Earth it would have been dangerous to expose genitilia to unpredictable, wild creatures.
There is no biblical evidence as to the size of Adam's "parts". Not sure where you are getting this information unless it is from unverified resources.
It is possible Adam had a large package because one must assume that God has a large package. Since humans were created in the image of God it is logical to assume that Adam had pornstar-like attributes. In The Holy Bible there is a passage referring to Eve's appreciation of her mate's manliness. However, she had very little to compare Adam to except for yaks or maybe moose.
Adam spent much of his life unclothed so, yes, he was "free to the breeze".

He was definitely not Christian.
Only one commandment, still couldn't keep it.

He was definitely not Christian.
Only one commandment, still couldn't keep it.
Sounds like a Christian to me!![]()
I am so not even going to go there. LOL![]()
Okay now I know you're trolling.
Fairwarning, as always, I enjoy our debate. You asked if eternal life was why I believe and yes it is one reason. I do believe John 3:16 That God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whoever believes in him shall not Parish but have everlasting life.
I didn't have a strong faith background growing up. I had a rough childhood. I questioned the thought of a loving God. It was finally in College that I became a Christian. I pretty much came to the conclusion that I was trying to be God. Trying to have things line up the way I would want them. Life isn't like that. I was fucking up bad. At a particularly low point I just said "God, I give up. I can't do this. Maybe you can help me."
I wish I could say that life has been a bed of roses since then. It hasn't. But when you accept Christ as your savior he sends the holy spirit to work in you and with you. These are things I don't normally bring up in this type of debate because I only have the evidence of one changed life. Mine.
I fully recognise the amazingly wonderful people who live fantastic lives without the same belief that I do. You for instance.
I was giving evidence to why the bible can be accepted literally. I do look at as many views as possible. With my position I have to look at what people are saying against it. I have to find out if it is true. If it is false I need to be able to explain why. I must have misunderstood you, I hope I did that - instead of looking at facts you filter it though the culture of our times? Clarify please.![]()