Creationism.

Is Creationism a science?


  • Total voters
    112
Genesis 2:4-9 Adam was created before any plants.

This is inaccurate. Adam needed plants to cover his modest private parts and for bedding. Plus The Bible describes how he made salads, tea and vegetarian entrees.

God made plants available to Adam though maybe the rest of Earth was barren. I don't know.
 
i just realized that i have replied in this thread without voting on the poll. lol
 
Simple fact of the matter is this...

Whether we think something did or didn't happen, or if we behoove something exists or doesn't, that is irrelevant to whether it did, our does.

Something can either exist in this universe or it can't. No amount of belted OS going to change that simple fact.
 
Simple fact of the matter is this...

Whether we think something did or didn't happen, or if we behoove something exists or doesn't, that is irrelevant to whether it did, our does.

Something can either exist in this universe or it can't. No amount of belted OS going to change that simple fact.

Wrong lots of stuff there.
 
You understood that well enough comment with something more than :confused: I'm bloody damned impressed.
 
You understood that well enough comment with something more than :confused: I'm bloody damned impressed.

It just reminded me of "The Sphinx" from "Mystery Men"

Mr. Furious: Okay, am I the only one who finds these sayings just a little bit formulaic? "If you want to push something down, you have to pull it up. If you want to go left, you have to go right." It's...
The Sphinx: Your temper is very quick, my friend. But until you learn to master your rage...
Mr. Furious: ...your rage will become your master? That's what you were going to say. Right? Right?
The Sphinx: Not necessarily.
 
This is inaccurate. Adam needed plants to cover his modest private parts and for bedding. Plus The Bible describes how he made salads, tea and vegetarian entrees.

God made plants available to Adam though maybe the rest of Earth was barren. I don't know.
Adam had the granddaddy of all honkers. There was nothing modest about his private parts.

He might have needed leaves to cover his head when he prayed, but the rest of him was free to the breeze.
 
Adam had the granddaddy of all honkers. There was nothing modest about his private parts.

He might have needed leaves to cover his head when he prayed, but the rest of him was free to the breeze.

There is no biblical evidence as to the size of Adam's "parts". Not sure where you are getting this information unless it is from unverified resources.

It is possible Adam had a large package because one must assume that God has a large package. Since humans were created in the image of God it is logical to assume that Adam had pornstar-like attributes. In The Holy Bible there is a passage referring to Eve's appreciation of her mate's manliness. However, she had very little to compare Adam to except for yaks or maybe moose.

Adam spent much of his life unclothed so, yes, he was "free to the breeze".
 
This is inaccurate. Adam needed plants to cover his modest private parts and for bedding. Plus The Bible describes how he made salads, tea and vegetarian entrees.

God made plants available to Adam though maybe the rest of Earth was barren. I don't know.

Except Adam wasn't covering up. How the hell did I miss this? Adam got to rock out with his cock out for an undetermined amount of time.
 
Except Adam wasn't covering up. How the hell did I miss this? Adam got to rock out with his cock out for an undetermined amount of time.

Much of what we think we know about Adam comes from interpretation of Renaissance-era painters. In reality we don't know much about Adam's life but since he was a Christian man it's reasonable to assume he did not "rock out with his cock out".

With all the new animals on Earth it would have been dangerous to expose genitilia to unpredictable, wild creatures.
 
Much of what we think we know about Adam comes from interpretation of Renaissance-era painters. In reality we don't know much about Adam's life but since he was a Christian man it's reasonable to assume he did not "rock out with his cock out".

With all the new animals on Earth it would have been dangerous to expose genitilia to unpredictable, wild creatures.

He was definitely not Christian.

Only one commandment, still couldn't keep it.
 
Much of what we think we know about Adam comes from interpretation of Renaissance-era painters. In reality we don't know much about Adam's life but since he was a Christian man it's reasonable to assume he did not "rock out with his cock out".

With all the new animals on Earth it would have been dangerous to expose genitilia to unpredictable, wild creatures.

He wasn't Christian. The first Christians wouldn't come about for about four thousand years give or take. We know he did in fact hang out with his wang out and it's implied that animals in the garden knew their fucking place and wouldn't attack because if they did a lightning bolt would make them a pile of dust.
 
There is no biblical evidence as to the size of Adam's "parts". Not sure where you are getting this information unless it is from unverified resources.

It is possible Adam had a large package because one must assume that God has a large package. Since humans were created in the image of God it is logical to assume that Adam had pornstar-like attributes. In The Holy Bible there is a passage referring to Eve's appreciation of her mate's manliness. However, she had very little to compare Adam to except for yaks or maybe moose.

Adam spent much of his life unclothed so, yes, he was "free to the breeze".

I am so not even going to go there. LOL:eek::D
 
He was definitely not Christian.

Only one commandment, still couldn't keep it.

You do not know what was in his heart. Adam loved the Lord and - despite his nudity which has been questioned in this thread - he was a devout Christian even before being Christian was "cool".

Many envy Adam because he lived in a time of few distractions. He had plenty of time to read The Holy Bible and pray. There as no TV (or any pop culture), no work (God gave him everything) and no urban noise. Basically, it was paradise for a reader and, surely, Adam was a big reader.
 
Sounds like a Christian to me! :D

Adam was not perfect and he made mistakes including cursing, social drinking and lust.

But as my family taught me Adam was the first Christian. My uncle - God rest his soul - taught me that the name "Adam" means "First in the Lord's Flock" or "Jesus' First Disciple".
 
One thing is certain. When Eve first showed up, the first thing Adam had to do was clean off a place for her to sit down.
 
Fairwarning, as always, I enjoy our debate. You asked if eternal life was why I believe and yes it is one reason. I do believe John 3:16 That God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whoever believes in him shall not Parish but have everlasting life.

I didn't have a strong faith background growing up. I had a rough childhood. I questioned the thought of a loving God. It was finally in College that I became a Christian. I pretty much came to the conclusion that I was trying to be God. Trying to have things line up the way I would want them. Life isn't like that. I was fucking up bad. At a particularly low point I just said "God, I give up. I can't do this. Maybe you can help me."

I wish I could say that life has been a bed of roses since then. It hasn't. But when you accept Christ as your savior he sends the holy spirit to work in you and with you. These are things I don't normally bring up in this type of debate because I only have the evidence of one changed life. Mine.

I fully recognise the amazingly wonderful people who live fantastic lives without the same belief that I do. You for instance.

I was giving evidence to why the bible can be accepted literally. I do look at as many views as possible. With my position I have to look at what people are saying against it. I have to find out if it is true. If it is false I need to be able to explain why. I must have misunderstood you, I hope I did that - instead of looking at facts you filter it though the culture of our times? Clarify please.:rose:

OK. Just as an aside, in response to some of your post, IMO many people who are recent converts to religion have more often than not, trodden some of lifes hardest paths on their way to faith.

Now to your question regarding filtering information. Well, because I don't believe the Universe and all it contains was made in 6 days I don't take historical records contained in the Bible as literal. So, I believe that when the Bible records some amazing event that appears completely improbable it just requires us to understand the event within the context or culture of the time.

For example the parting of the Red Sea by Moses. I favour a scientific explanation such as : http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99580&page=1 It just so happened it was very windy that day ;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top