Creationism.

[kbate]

what about the big feceas ?

I do not see what the history of England has to do with this thread.

 

[Sean]

you could.

No, you burned your best friend. And after we got together you burned her again.

 

[torchthebitch]

what about the big fecal matter pile ?

That's no way to talk about ykw.

 

[hobbit.]

I do not see what the history of England has to do with this thread.

is this the papist view?

That's no way to talk about ykw.

is that a typo for usa

 

[butters]

that is deep for someone from Essex... did God create Pit Bulls?



what about the big fecal matter pile ?

despite Brentwood's tv-popularity, it's only one very small, very orange part of essex, oh furry-footed one.

most of the mutts being labeled 'pit bull type' are really short-legged, bandy, flip-top headed grinning softy staffs. do you suppose dog's believe in Dog? does he/it support the underdog?

 

[dolf]

No, you burned your best friend. And after we got together you burned her again.

i think she said it best:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=39005213#post39005213

i'll go paint my toenails.

 

[hobbit.]

despite Brentwood's tv-popularity, it's only one very small, very orange part of essex, oh furry-footed one.

most of the mutts being labeled 'pit bull type' are really short-legged, bandy, flip-top headed grinning softy staffs. do you suppose dog's believe in Dog? does he/it support the underdog?

See.. you imeadiatley thought by "pitbull' i was meaning 'vicious dog often owned by pykies" I actually meant the white stilletoe heeld haridens of Colchester.

 

[kbate]

is this the papist view?



is that a typo for usa

Today I am feeling rather arian in my religious fervor, definitely not the papist view.


I had to hit 'back' to catch your typo, you edited between my click on quote and the time the window opened. I wanted the typo more than I wanted the joke to work.

 

[Sean]

i think she said it best:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=39005213#post39005213

i'll go paint my toenails.

LMAO. Why don't you link the pm where you told her I lick well?

 

[butters]

See.. you imeadiatley thought by "pitbull' i was meaning 'vicious dog often owned by pykies" I actually meant the white stilletoe heeld haridens of Colchester.

ah, you seem rather more conversant with those than i. 'appy memories, hobs?


woof!

 

[CandiCame]

I voted God did it, because I like to hedge my bets and since I repented in a codicil, I felt I should at least honour God for a while.

I mean, if he did it - then I'm safe and If I'm right and he didn't - I'm still safe. Belief is a win-win situation providing you've notarized and stored your letter of repentance carefully.

Holy shit.

You're right.

 

[hobbit.]

LMAO. Why don't you link the pm where you told her I lick well?

ah, you seem rather more conversant with those than i. 'appy memories, hobs?


woof!

cheer up! United under 21's just beat spurs 2 - 1, macheda got both goals

happy day....

 

[dogwatch]

I voted God did it, because I like to hedge my bets and since I repented in a codicil, I felt I should at least honour God for a while.

I mean, if he did it - then I'm safe and If I'm right and he didn't - I'm still safe. Belief is a win-win situation providing you've notarized and stored your letter of repentance carefully.

Ah yes Pascal, but which god?

 

[Recidiva]

I voted "other"

There may be some creative force I can't fathom that put things into motion.

What's left now doesn't match any definition of "intelligence" I can apply.

Creationism is not science, it is an opinion.

"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens

 

[chillywilly2]

LMAO. Why don't you link the pm where you told her I lick well?

hijacking your own thread?


is that allowed?

 

[KRCummings]

I keep seeing these polls that say something like 45% believe in the literal Bible account of creation yet I've never met a single person who believes this way. Not one. Who are they asking?
I don't think I've ever met anyone who believes the Bible should be taken literally even from the New Testament because it's, you know not supposed to be.
I think they either intentionally ask a certain group of people or they phrase the questions in a manner that causes confusion. No way is the number really that high.

 

[neci]

I keep seeing these polls that say something like 45% believe in the literal Bible account of creation yet I've never met a single person who believes this way. Not one. Who are they asking?
I don't think I've ever met anyone who believes the Bible should be taken literally even from the New Testament because it's, you know not supposed to be.
I think they either intentionally ask a certain group of people or they phrase the questions in a manner that causes confusion. No way is the number really that high.

i've met quite a few.

 

[phrodeau]

I keep seeing these polls that say something like 45% believe in the literal Bible account of creation yet I've never met a single person who believes this way. Not one. Who are they asking?
I don't think I've ever met anyone who believes the Bible should be taken literally even from the New Testament because it's, you know not supposed to be.
I think they either intentionally ask a certain group of people or they phrase the questions in a manner that causes confusion. No way is the number really that high.

Do you visit many towns under 1,000 population?

 

[rosco rathbone]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point#Tipler

 

[KRCummings]

Do you visit many towns under 1,000 population?

Not to where I'd stop and talk religion with anyone. Does anybody do that?

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

I keep seeing these polls that say something like 45% believe in the literal Bible account of creation yet I've never met a single person who believes this way. Not one. Who are they asking?
I don't think I've ever met anyone who believes the Bible should be taken literally even from the New Testament because it's, you know not supposed to be.
I think they either intentionally ask a certain group of people or they phrase the questions in a manner that causes confusion. No way is the number really that high.

I know people who think the Bible is infallible and historical correct and that dinosaurs never existed. Talk about being Gawdsmacked.

 

[KRCummings]

I know people who think the Bible is infallible and historical correct and that dinosaurs never existed. Talk about being Gawdsmacked.

See, I know plenty who think it is infallible and plenty who believe it is historically correct. Neither of those means you have to take it literally. I don't know anyone who believes the universe was created in six 24hr days. I know those people are out there but I dispute poll numbers I've seen because they suggest half the people I know are like that and that is not true.
People who don't believe in dinosaurs are just stupid.

 

[CHNOPS]

I keep seeing these polls that say something like 45% believe in the literal Bible account of creation yet I've never met a single person who believes this way. Not one. Who are they asking?
I don't think I've ever met anyone who believes the Bible should be taken literally even from the New Testament because it's, you know not supposed to be.
I think they either intentionally ask a certain group of people or they phrase the questions in a manner that causes confusion. No way is the number really that high.

I think it goes something like this: the question is, 'Do you believe the Biblical account of creation is the correct one?' People have a choice between putting in writing that they don't believe it, in full view of an omnipotent being who controls their afterlife, or just saying yes where no one they know can see it. Answer: A) Yes!

 

[Cade Is Here]

Where's the "Okay, what drug is seanh on today" ??

 

[koalabear]

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m89h0oVqdg1qajiqn.jpg

Exactly, how else do you explain that guys hair.