graceanne
iteroticalay urugay
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2004
- Posts
- 27,585
DVS said:I'm sorry, but I must disagree. I see what Betticus is talking about, and quite clearly. I've also experienced the no return message thing. At last count, it was well over 40 messages with no replys.
No, I'm not one of those weirdos, and no, I'm not a sphyco. I read profiles and answer the ones that I think I have a match with. Granted, after 30 no replies, I have gotten much less excited about the intital message that I send. After all, why spend too much time on something that probably won't even get read?
Sure, there are sicko men out there, and I'm sure women get tons of messages from them that they end up deleting, because they don't fit what they are looking for. Sure, I know I'm fighting to be heard above these sickos and I know it's quickly becoming a losing battle. Trust me, I've been at this before. I'm not new to this. But, I know it's only getting worse, if I can't get any replys from the messages I've sent.
No, I"m not going to let anyone critic my messages. I'm an adult male and I know how to talk to someone of the opposite sex. I've done it enough times. But, I've tried different tactics to get someone's attention, and nothing seems to work.
Yes, I did get a couple to reply, but that was on alt.com. I payed a pretty penny there and all I got was a few women who lied on their profile. One of them is also on collarme and I've kind of struck up a conversation with her. I wanted to understand what triggered her to reply.
She said she agreed with me that she was too quick to judge me, but she didn't offer to give me another chance. She also said she gave the most persistant men the most credibility. What she meant by that I guess, is someone who sent enough messages that caught her eye, she would eventually respond to them. I call that the princess attitude, folks. And, she's got it bad.
Another I met on alt gave me her Yahoo ID. Every so often she sends me a very short, rather cryptic message. they usually don't mean much on their own, and I wonder why she is even sending them. One time she wrote "long time no hear." I didn't understand this because we had been chatting on Yahoo, then she said she had a phone call. She then typed "BRB."
OK, as the time went by, I knew she wasn't coming back. So, why did she send me a message that said "long time no hear"? Just a sicko broad? Another message she sent said she had moved. I sent one back asking if she was going to tell me where she moved to. It's been about a month. I'm still waiting for her to reply. LOL, no, I"m not really waiting.
I'm not dumb. I am wondering though, if some of these women are just so domb or maybe so dense that they truly have no idea what they want and reject or ignore every one who sends them messages.
Back to the first woman...she seems to be communicating with me quite freely, now. Maybe she thinks we are friends. I did send a little short story to her. She quickly wrote back asking where I lived. LOL, I thought sure I had her attention, then.
But, we only chated on Yahoo for about two minutes before she disconnected. I had no time to ask her any questions and she only asked me a few. Nothing of any substance was said by either of us. Nothing any normal person could use to decide yes or no to anything, vanilla, kinky, or anything else.
She dropped me just like the other woman did, and gave me no reason why she did. Does that sound like something a sane and caring woman should do to someone she DIDN'T consider to be a sicko? Or did she consider me to be a sicko, then, and that's why she treated me so rudely? And, if I was such a sicko, why is sne communicating so freely with me, now? She has even given me her real name. Ah, but still no offers to reconsider my status. LOL.
And, if she did consider me to be a sicko, how did she know? How can someone tell these things in such a short and uneventful first meeting? If women are judging other men the same way I seem to be judged, this isn't working for others besides me.
Now, if I had a good picture to send, that might catch their eye. Then, I'd have to sometime down the road mention that I'm not that guy. But, maybe going for the physical lure first is one possible way to get a reply. But when the profile mentions certain "things" and I fit into those "things", I expect at least a quick message saying "thanks, but no thanks."
And, my profile is not hateful. I don't have women sending me messages asking me to piss on them or make them eat shit or something. In fact, I don't get anyone sending me initial messages, either.
Hey, folks. I know I'm not the problem. I know I've never had a problem communicating with sane, caring people who are looking for the same thing as I am. In fact, that usually makes it easier, if the person is looking for you, just as you are looking for them. Well, that's not working in this case.
So, I don't go for the need to make your profile sound so hateful. Sure, you might be getting lots of messages from sickos, but does the hateful profile even put a dent in them? I doubt it. I tend to agree with Betticus that some form of grading system would be helpful, but I also agree it would soon degrade into only a vendetta thing.
Just like some voters on Literotica, in the past. They had methods of voting a "1" for some stories to lower their status and vote a five for their story and get others to do the same. I haven't noticed it lately, but it was done quite often, about a year ago.
People will be people. They will do what they will, and at the expense of others, if need be. The princess girls waiting for their special prince can just go on and wait. By the time they figure out he ain't coming, how many also rans will have come and gone? No 100% match? How many 75% matches have been rudely ignored, because that 100% could be the very next message?
I know some women get gobs of sicko mail. Personally, I see that as their problem, and not mine. In the last paragraph I said people will be people. Well, up to now, all I've seen reply to me are what I see as wannabes. What are they wanting to be? People, maybe?
Damn typos!!
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Their loss. And they are wannabes if they over look you.
)