Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is commonly accepted that global temperatures and climate have varied considerably over the course of the earth's six billion year existence. Decomposing, attributing and apportioning that part of climate change that has occurred over the last two hundred-odd years into that which is natural variation and that which is human-caused is no mean feat. It is an immensely complex undertaking fraught with chance for error.
Yes, snow and cold is evidence of Global Warming.
Reminds me of the words of a famous author. What was his name? Oh yeah, George Orwell:
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.
That sounds about right. Rock on, my liberal pinhead friends!......Carney
Meanwhile, in the world of science rather than fiction...
Barber and more than 300 scientists from around the globe spent last winter on the Canadian Coast Guard research ship Amundsen in the Arctic, studying the impact of climate change.
Full story here. *Sigh*
The global warming conspiracy to soak taxpayers is obvious to everyone but the Usual Suspects.
"...fraught with chance for error."
Why in the fuck would anyone in their right mind not want to err on the side of caution?
You Cons treat everything like a fucking game...winning is all that counts. If you can yell them down, that’s a win. If you can claim to be right even when you know you're wrong, that's still a win. If you have to lie and cheat, that's okay, still a win. It's fucking Texas-Oklahoma, Michigan-Ohio State, Duke-Carolina--just a fuckin game.
Only problem with your fuckin games is that real people get hurt. You've killed tens of thousands in the last eight years and broke the whole fuckin world, but you still carry on your bullshit.
You are unconscionable.
I learned an important lesson when I was 21. Nothing gets done unless you do it yourself. And 99.99% of people are in the game for the money. These are absolutes that guarantee fame and fortune: DO IT YOURSELF & YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS.
The above may be the single largest and most astounding assembly of ( incorrect ) assertions I think I've ever encountered in a single post in all my time on this website. It is breathtaking in its simplemindedness. Do you always jump to conclusions? Do you always shoot your mouth off with absolutely no idea of what you are talking about?
It's simply not worth the time to detail the massive flaw in your logic. Do you have any comprehension of the consequences should civilization suddenly and unilaterally decide to abandon scientific method in favor of instantaneous and unquestioning acceptance of the hypothesis du jour?
Do you understand scientific method? Do you understand that there is a difference between science and politics? Do you understand that someone's skin color may not be a reliable indicator of their political beliefs? Do you comprehend that association is not causation? Do you believe in the Medieval Warm Period? Why can't you admit that human understanding of climate is, at best, modest if not downright primitive?
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/changing-artic_monthly_wx_review.png
On CO2 residence times, fossil fuel contributions and mass balance:
http://www.greenworldtrust.org.uk/Science/Scientific/Segalstad.htm
Regarding pH and oceans and a paper on the problem with ice core data:
http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf
Water vapor as a positive or negative feedback mechanism:
http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-cont...rcing-Feedback-AGU-09-San-Francisco-final.pdf
Growth of the Antarctic icesheet:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/308/5730/1898
Temperature records from NASA's
Goddard Institute for Space Studies:
Fort Smith, NWT, Canada
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=403719340000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Coppermine, NWT, Canada
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=403719380005&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Anadyr, Siberia, Russia
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=222255630007&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Markovo, Siberia, Russia
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=222255510000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Punta Arenas, Argentina
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=304859340004&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
San Antonio, Chile
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=301877840003&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Amundsen-Scot, Antarctica
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=700890090008&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Davis, Antarctica
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=700895710008&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Christchurch, New Zealand
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=507937800000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Hokitika Aero, New Zealand
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/g...py?id=507936150000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Splicing data series:
http://nber-nsf09.ucdavis.edu/program/papers/auffhammer.pdf
http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/great-global-warming-blunder-pdo-2000-2008-5monavg.jpg
Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008:
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2008/2008GL035333.shtml
http://photos.smugmug.com/photos/759324400_BjmZq-M.jpg
All that yelling and throwing thousands of words of Fundie Con shit on the wall, just helped prove my point.
I repeat. Responsible men err on the side of caution when faced with a possible catastrophe, but you Cons don't--you just want to win.
To reward their oil buddies, your guys ran the price of oil to $147.00 per barrel, the highest in history, triggering a global economic crisis, and started a war for oil on a lie that killed tens of thousands of civilians, not to mention soldiers. Yet you defend them.
You are unconscionable.
You're absolutely right; I'm a part time mass murderer. I drop napalm on old people and I operate concentration camps. I'm a cross between Satan, Mao Zedong (Tse-tung), Stalin and Pol Pot. Your deductive powers are amazing. I have just two questions for you: (1) how did you discover my true identity and (2) whaddya think about that ol' Medieval Warm Period?
Perhaps the climate change deniers would do better if they were honest about their motives, which have nothing to do with science.
Their objections are political. They believe that any evidence of climate change is based on politics and their denial is also based on politics.
The Medieval Warming Period has nothing to do with my point. It was a thousand years ago and there are conflicting opinions as to its severity and whether it was regional or global.
My point is that, with a possible catastrophe facing us or our children...
Horseshit. You are the worst offender at interjecting politics rather than discuss the putative science.
Let's burn plump Usual Suspects at our power plants.

why do I feel, that folks here dont care much about the outcome, but the game![]()