I've seen the newest swiftboat ad in which the guy who served ON KERRY'S BOAT, WITH KERYY, LONGER THAN ANYONE ELSE, says Kerry is lying about Cambodia and that he has NEVER been to Cambodia on a secret mission...
In an interview, he points out two more etched-in-stone lies that Kerry has been parroting for years!
OUCH!
I'm still waiting for that FIRST BUSH LIE Democrats!
Sunday, Aug. 29, 2004 11:07 p.m. EDT
Kerry Stonewalling on Medals Mystery
Kerry campaign officials are refusing to answer questions about discrepancies in the military records posted to the presidential candidate's campaign Web site after Navy officials and outside experts challenged the authenticity of some of Kerry's decorations.
Chicago Sun-Times reporter Thomas Lipscomb said Sunday that he's tried to reach Kerry campaign spokesman Michael Meehan 10 times about the controversy - all without response.
“I [also] tried to get John Hurley, head of Veterans for Kerry, to give me reaction," Lipscomb told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg on Sunday. But he wouldn't respond either.
On Friday, Lipscomb reported that former Navy Secretary John Lehman is challenging citations posted to Kerry's campaign Web site that include his signature.
"It is a total mystery to me. I never saw it. I never signed it. I never approved it. And the additional language it contains was not written by me," Lehman said.
B.G. Burkett, author of the definitive book on fraudulent medals, "Stolen Valor," told Lipscomb there's a problem with the citation for Kerry's "Silver Star with Combat V."
"I've run across several claims for Silver Stars with combat V's, but they were all in fake records," he told Lipscomb.
Several of the military records that appear on Kerry's Web site "appear to be fraudulent, according to U.S. Navy standards," the Sun-Times reporter told Malzberg.
"The Navy is now saying Kerry's records are incorrect," he added. "He's not entitled to this award. He's not entitled to that award. This is a new ballgame."
I got news for you. In three days they HAVE to shut up. McCain's already stolen their free speech.
This is just a publicity stunt to embarass him as he speaks in front of a veterans group where he says he has three really big policy announcements. They know the damage has been done and he is listing to starboard.
Let me see, three major policy announcements...
You can't win a war against an ideology. So Bush is a liar...
Free health care for ALL veterans of Vietrnam. Bush is a liar...
The greatrest economy in the history of the world. Bush is a liar...
Mark it. 11:56, September 2, 2004, the Kerry campaign imploded during a hastily-thrown-together, poorly-thought-out late night rally in Ohio.
UPDATE: I am informed Kerry opened his speech by saying something very important happened, tonight . . . "The Red Sox pulled within 2.5 games of the Yankees."
Problem is, the Red Sox and the Yankees both won, so the Red Sox are 3.5 games behind, as they have been the last 2 days.
...
Who does he blame this one on? Lockhart?
...
I think when you grow up, you will be just like me!
In 1996, Adm. Boorda committed suicide after he was accused of wearing medals he hadn't earned.
At the time, Sen. Kerry told the Boston Herald that the error was "sufficient to question his leadership position."
"If you wind up being less than what you're pretending to be, there is a major confrontation with value, self-esteem and your sense of how others view you," Kerry told the Boston Globe.
Good gawd, three people dumbass enough to believe Nixon was president Christmas '68! One of them HAS to be the poster George W. Bush. No one else here seems to be that fucking illiterate except some of the younger "hate America" Euros.
Now, Kerry wasn't in Cambodia, but he was in China. Fucker loves commies every bit as much as the Peanut farmer from Plains...
John Kerry Visits China
The Bush administration has resisted the powerful aerospace lobby to restart space exports to China. The main reason is because of the continuing Chinese proliferation of advanced missile and nuclear weapons technology to Iran, Pakistan and North Korea.
Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz backs the Kerry campaign. Since 2000, Schwartz has donated over $4 million to Democrats including Kerry.
Kerry also has a secret relationship with Beijing. During the late 1990s, John Kerry traveled to Beijing on behalf of a firm associated with the Chinese military and today he does not want to talk about it.
Yet the Massachusetts-based firm of Boston Capital and Technology openly advertised its connection to Sen. Kerry and also admitted selling advanced U.S. space technology to China. Boston Capital's Web site noted that the firm was "China Advisor to U.S. Senator's commercial agenda for China."
"Advised, assisted, and executed Minister level commercial agenda for U.S. Senator. Advanced Senator in China for all Minister level meetings, coordinated and acted as liaison to:
The U.S. State Department, The U.S. Embassy in Beijing, The Department of Commerce, and all relevant Chinese authorities," states the Web site.
According to the company's Web page, BCT "acted" as a China adviser to "U.S. High Technology's Corporation technology transfer efforts in the People's Republic of China. They were responsible for technology transfer for full-scale manufacturing in China of technologies in telecommunications and satellites."
"Each production package sells for $15-$20 million. The Corporation has successfully transferred these [satellite] technologies to several Chinese manufacturers now in production," states the Boston Capital & Technology Web site.
The Bush administration's position on space technology exports to China is a matter of public record. President Bush has resisted the big money trying so hard to help the Chinese military.
In contrast, Sen. Kerry's position remains secret. Both the senator's campaign and the senator's office refused repeated requests to answer questions. The Kerry policy toward the Chinese military space program is written on large donation checks and remains behind the closed doors of a secret meeting in Beijing.
Spontaneous Conformities and the China Threat
Lev Navrozov
Friday, Sept. 3, 2004
Under absolutism, such as dictatorship, the power holders impose on their populations certain obligatory beliefs, to which the population should conform.
Thus the citizens of Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia and post-1949 China were to believe that they were living under true democracy while people in the English-speaking countries were living under the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie or of the Jewish plutocracy, as Hitler put it.
…
But in 1859 John Stuart Mill argued that conformities not only may be imposed by an omnipotent tyrant but also may be created spontaneously by citizens themselves and be more absurd, intolerant and vindictive with respect to nonconformists than conformities imposed by omnipotent tyrants.
…
Even more universal in the West is the conformity whereby no one has been noticing the Chinese rulers’ development of post-nuclear weapons in seven fields since 1986. In the past several years, as the development of nanoweapons has become especially intense in China, this conformity in the West has been total. To mention what was still called occasionally in the 1990s the “China threat” is ill-mannered, unfashionable, harmful.