British men are less fertile than hamsters

About died laughing

I swear I just about died laughing when I first read the title to this post. Of course when I followed the link to the article it wasn't quite as funny but still. C'mon, no one can't tell me that weird silly things didn't pop into their minds when they first saw the words British Men are less fertile then hamsters"
 
Re: About died laughing

Fairytat said:
I swear I just about died laughing when I first read the title to this post. Of course when I followed the link to the article it wasn't quite as funny but still. C'mon, no one can't tell me that weird silly things didn't pop into their minds when they first saw the words British Men are less fertile then hamsters"

Yep I had a sudden picture of a tabloid paper headline saying "Brit men to have gene's spliced with hamster's to boost fertility" and a sub headline reading "abilllity to store food in cheeks comes as double bonus"
 
Cheyenne

I mean this most respectfully,

BUT SHAME ON YOU FOR NOT LETTING SLEEPING DOGS LIE!
 
Re: Cheyenne

SINthysist said:
I mean this most respectfully,

BUT SHAME ON YOU FOR NOT LETTING SLEEPING DOGS LIE!

Truth? Unregistered linked this thread to mine. I followed his/her link there back to this thread and when I posted, I thought I was posting to my own thread but screwed up (too many windows open at the same time.) My fix was to add the link back to MY thread to this post. But I didn't mean to bring this one back in the first place. Confusing, huh? In any case, Brits still have less sperm than hamsters. :p
 
Hey people! Read the article. It said Britain and the rest of the industrialised world.

Americans just became less fertile than hamsters too!
 
bluespoke said:
Hey people! Read the article. It said Britain and the rest of the industrialised world.

Americans just became less fertile than hamsters too!

Pssst... we're skipping that part and focusing on the Brits only. :D
 
Aren't Hamsters rodents? Little squeaky things that need to produce as many offspring as possible so that a few might avoid becomeing an owl's lunch for long enough to reproduce themselves?

We don't have to be as fertile as hamsters. Perhaps the Americans of the board are suggesting that the British should be produceing six litters of 10 a year. Well, I'm game to try.

edited to add the question- why have I started leaving the 'e' in my verbs ending in 'ing'?
 
Last edited:
Hampster's need to be able to reproduce in large numbers so Richard Gere(sp) will have enough to shove up his arse. :eek:
 
Re: Re: Change this to read

bluespoke said:


And you sir, are a prize wanker (ask Siren for a definition).


And a little itty bitty wanker at that! He is just jealous!

Ebonyfire <winking at bluespoke>
 
Thank God!

bluespoke said:
Hey people! Read the article. It said Britain and the rest of the industrialised world.

Americans just became less fertile than hamsters too!

It is getting crowded over here!

Ebony
 
Back
Top