Sean Renaud
The West Coast Pop
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 59,682
Yes, the effect is the same but it matters sometimes when people are talking about nuance. You asked about the government making money and the government pretty much definition cannot make money because it always has exactly the amount it wants. If it has too much it doesn't spend money (which causes deflation or prevents inflation) when it doesn't have enough it magics up some more (causing inflation or preventing deflation.) At least at the federal level. States and other smaller entities have to play closer to the rules of you and I.
The circle jerk is "necessary" because we've been told it's necessary over the years. It makes people feel good but no it isn't the most efficient method, just the most efficient one people will likely stand for.
Oh, I have no argument that big pharma has more people addicted and that they are the biggest drug "cartel" on the planet. Nor of their methods. I assumed you didn't mean they shouldn't be regulated so I guess then my question would be what exactly about liquor do you think is over regulated? Aside from liquor licenses which strictly speaking aren't a regulation on liquor but on where they can be served and sold. (An important distinction because you can own a gun, you can't go set up a target at the end of your street and start firing at it and most of us agree that's with good reason.)
I 100% agree we'd cut crime by having drugs readily available at Wal-Mart. I also think them being regulated (which you did not say they shouldn't be) would make things safer as well. You'd know what you were getting (at least as much as you do now. I'm not going to lie and claim that I know what half the shit in M&Ms actually are but I could google it if I cared.) And there would be someone to take to court if you got a bad batch.
The Food Safety Modernization Act I've seen several versions of the story but not being a farmer of any sort it's difficult to parse out more than it sounds good, farmers sound mad and I was curious about your take on it.
The circle jerk is "necessary" because we've been told it's necessary over the years. It makes people feel good but no it isn't the most efficient method, just the most efficient one people will likely stand for.
Oh, I have no argument that big pharma has more people addicted and that they are the biggest drug "cartel" on the planet. Nor of their methods. I assumed you didn't mean they shouldn't be regulated so I guess then my question would be what exactly about liquor do you think is over regulated? Aside from liquor licenses which strictly speaking aren't a regulation on liquor but on where they can be served and sold. (An important distinction because you can own a gun, you can't go set up a target at the end of your street and start firing at it and most of us agree that's with good reason.)
I 100% agree we'd cut crime by having drugs readily available at Wal-Mart. I also think them being regulated (which you did not say they shouldn't be) would make things safer as well. You'd know what you were getting (at least as much as you do now. I'm not going to lie and claim that I know what half the shit in M&Ms actually are but I could google it if I cared.) And there would be someone to take to court if you got a bad batch.
The Food Safety Modernization Act I've seen several versions of the story but not being a farmer of any sort it's difficult to parse out more than it sounds good, farmers sound mad and I was curious about your take on it.
