An interesting thought/question

[April]

Should I let a web site that purports to test my html do so if their own html is faulty?

 

[honeylick]

i'd shy from that...

it would be like a spinster giving you oral-sex pointers.

 

[Nitsuj]

or a blind eye doctor

 

[XdOu™]

i dont know what to tell you...

 

[April]

Hehe

 

[The Heretic]

By "test" do you mean validate it?

I know some purists insist that all websites should pass the W3C validation suite but I am more concerned about the big picture; making my website accessible to as many people as possible by not using non-text items (e.g. graphic buttons) for navigation, and using HTML constructs appropriately. A lot of the purists use tables for layout and then bitch about not passing the W3C validation - they worry about the letter of the law without understanding the spirit of it (W3C recommends against using tables for layout of anything but tabular data).

 

[April]

Yes, validate.

I found it funny. Ironic even. No, I won't be using their "service".