thebullet
Rebel without applause
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Posts
- 1,247
Last week I posted an article that showed that in the last decade over 900,000 Americans died because they didn't have access to readily available health care technology. They didn't have access because they were poor.
I've read on this forum that America has the best healthcare in the world; all the other countries' healthcare systems are socialist; and yadda yadda yadda. I thought it would be appropriate to see how America stacks up against all of those socialist systems in health care delivery.
How about infant mortality rates? Here are the current statistics for infant mortality rates per 1000 live births by country in descending sequence:
Infant Mortality /
100 Live births
Sweden 2.8
Japan 3.3
Finland 3.6
Norway 3.7
Czech Republic 4
Germany 4.2
France 4.3
Switzerland 4.4
Spain 4.5
Denmark 4.6
Austria 4.7
Canada 4.8
Australia 4.8
Portugal 5.1
United Kingdom 5.2
Ireland 5.5
Greece 5.6
New Zealand 6
Italy 6.1
United States 6.6
That makes the good ol' USA 20th in the world in infant mortality.
How about life expectancy?
Japan 81
Australia 80.3
Sweden 80.3
Switzerland 80.3
Canada 80
Italy 79.5
Spain 79.4
France 79.4
Israel 79.2
Norway 79.2
Austria 78.9
Greece 78.9
New Zealand 78.5
Germany 78.5
United Kingdom 78.3
Finland 78.2
Cyprus 77.5
Denmark 77.4
United States 77.4
We moved all the way up to 19th in the world in life expectancy.
The real question is what makes a good health care system? Is it more important that the health care system be free market so that the marketplace will determine the cost and efficacy of the service provided? Or is it more important to judge a health care system on the results of the service delivered to the general population?
American doctors and pharmacutecal companies may be the highest paid in the world. But they are delivering 3rd world health care to the people.
Which is more important?
I've read on this forum that America has the best healthcare in the world; all the other countries' healthcare systems are socialist; and yadda yadda yadda. I thought it would be appropriate to see how America stacks up against all of those socialist systems in health care delivery.
How about infant mortality rates? Here are the current statistics for infant mortality rates per 1000 live births by country in descending sequence:
Infant Mortality /
100 Live births
Sweden 2.8
Japan 3.3
Finland 3.6
Norway 3.7
Czech Republic 4
Germany 4.2
France 4.3
Switzerland 4.4
Spain 4.5
Denmark 4.6
Austria 4.7
Canada 4.8
Australia 4.8
Portugal 5.1
United Kingdom 5.2
Ireland 5.5
Greece 5.6
New Zealand 6
Italy 6.1
United States 6.6
That makes the good ol' USA 20th in the world in infant mortality.
How about life expectancy?
Japan 81
Australia 80.3
Sweden 80.3
Switzerland 80.3
Canada 80
Italy 79.5
Spain 79.4
France 79.4
Israel 79.2
Norway 79.2
Austria 78.9
Greece 78.9
New Zealand 78.5
Germany 78.5
United Kingdom 78.3
Finland 78.2
Cyprus 77.5
Denmark 77.4
United States 77.4
We moved all the way up to 19th in the world in life expectancy.
The real question is what makes a good health care system? Is it more important that the health care system be free market so that the marketplace will determine the cost and efficacy of the service provided? Or is it more important to judge a health care system on the results of the service delivered to the general population?
American doctors and pharmacutecal companies may be the highest paid in the world. But they are delivering 3rd world health care to the people.
Which is more important?