busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
All you liberal weenies, TWB,Purplehaze and Brainlock
- Thread starter busybody..
- Start date
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Here is the whole article, they are comin after YOU!
China’s Military Planners Took Credit for 9/11
John O. Edwards
Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2002
Soon after the horrific attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, two high-ranking Chinese military planners took credit for the 9/11 attacks – and were even hailed as national heroes in China.
In fact, three years before 9/11, the Chinese colonels had proposed the attacks and cited Osama bin Laden by name in their book "Unrestricted Warfare.” (Click Here for more info on book.)
The authors of "Unrestricted Warfare” are Senior Cols. Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, and in 1999 they wrote that an attack by bin Laden on the World Trade Center would be just the type of "unrestricted warfare” that could bring down America.
The book was published by China’s People’s Liberation Army and had the endorsement of the Chinese government.
"Unrestricted Warfare” makes clear its purpose: offering China and other "weak” countries a strategy to destroy the U.S. without a full-scale invasion, using unusual or "asymmetrical” warfare.
NewsMax has recently obtained the CIA translation of this astounding book and has made it available with an introduction by Al Santoli, editor of the prestigious China Reform Monitor.
The importance of this book was highlighted soon after 9/11, when the Chinese colonels were treated as national heroes.
In one interview with the Chinese government-owned Ta Kung Pao newspaper in Hong Kong, the colonels offered little sympathy for the Americans killed in 9/11.
They told the paper, "The series of attacks taking place in the United States were very dreary and terrifying, but they must not be viewed from a single perspective” – that is, the U.S. as victims. The colonels then added coldly that the Americans "were victims of U.S. foreign policy.”
The colonels were quick to take credit for the attacks on the World Trade Center, telling the paper their strategy had worked and that "September 11, 2001 very likely is the beginning of the decline of the United States, as a superpower."
Qiao and Wang offer in "Unrestricted Warfare” several new methods for destroying the U.S. – from manipulating U.S. media, to homicide-suicide bombing, to using immigrants as a fifth column, and even employing cyber attacks to destroy America’s critical infrastructure.
Both colonels agreed that the unconventional attacks of 9/11 were right from the pages of their book, and they demonstrated their theory works. "The attacks demonstrated the United States' fragility and weakness and showed that essentially it is unable to stand attacks. ... The United States, a giant tiger, has been dealing with mice; unexpectedly, this time it was bitten by mice – it has been wielding a large hammer but has been unable to find the flea.
"From a short-term perspective, the attacks in the United States will very likely have some effect on China's economy – they might affect China's economic growth. However, from a long-term viewpoint, they could be favorable to China."
"Unrestricted Warfare” has set off alarm bells among several high-ranking U.S. officers.
Adm. Thomas Moorer, former chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, warns, "'Unrestricted Warfare' reveals China’s game plan in its coming war with America.” He adds ominously, "China thinks it can destroy America by using these tactics.”
Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub, former chief of staff of U.S. Forces Korea, shares Adm. Moorer’s view.
"The 9/11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many terrorist nations and groups will try to imitate this operation,” Gen. Singlaub said, noting "China’s war book 'Unrestricted Warfare' will be their text.”
Editor's Note: The translation of "Unrestricted Warfare" made for the CIA is not available in print elsewhere – you can get it by Clicking Here. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
China/Taiwan
War on Terrorism
China’s Military Planners Took Credit for 9/11
John O. Edwards
Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2002
Soon after the horrific attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, two high-ranking Chinese military planners took credit for the 9/11 attacks – and were even hailed as national heroes in China.
In fact, three years before 9/11, the Chinese colonels had proposed the attacks and cited Osama bin Laden by name in their book "Unrestricted Warfare.” (Click Here for more info on book.)
The authors of "Unrestricted Warfare” are Senior Cols. Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, and in 1999 they wrote that an attack by bin Laden on the World Trade Center would be just the type of "unrestricted warfare” that could bring down America.
The book was published by China’s People’s Liberation Army and had the endorsement of the Chinese government.
"Unrestricted Warfare” makes clear its purpose: offering China and other "weak” countries a strategy to destroy the U.S. without a full-scale invasion, using unusual or "asymmetrical” warfare.
NewsMax has recently obtained the CIA translation of this astounding book and has made it available with an introduction by Al Santoli, editor of the prestigious China Reform Monitor.
The importance of this book was highlighted soon after 9/11, when the Chinese colonels were treated as national heroes.
In one interview with the Chinese government-owned Ta Kung Pao newspaper in Hong Kong, the colonels offered little sympathy for the Americans killed in 9/11.
They told the paper, "The series of attacks taking place in the United States were very dreary and terrifying, but they must not be viewed from a single perspective” – that is, the U.S. as victims. The colonels then added coldly that the Americans "were victims of U.S. foreign policy.”
The colonels were quick to take credit for the attacks on the World Trade Center, telling the paper their strategy had worked and that "September 11, 2001 very likely is the beginning of the decline of the United States, as a superpower."
Qiao and Wang offer in "Unrestricted Warfare” several new methods for destroying the U.S. – from manipulating U.S. media, to homicide-suicide bombing, to using immigrants as a fifth column, and even employing cyber attacks to destroy America’s critical infrastructure.
Both colonels agreed that the unconventional attacks of 9/11 were right from the pages of their book, and they demonstrated their theory works. "The attacks demonstrated the United States' fragility and weakness and showed that essentially it is unable to stand attacks. ... The United States, a giant tiger, has been dealing with mice; unexpectedly, this time it was bitten by mice – it has been wielding a large hammer but has been unable to find the flea.
"From a short-term perspective, the attacks in the United States will very likely have some effect on China's economy – they might affect China's economic growth. However, from a long-term viewpoint, they could be favorable to China."
"Unrestricted Warfare” has set off alarm bells among several high-ranking U.S. officers.
Adm. Thomas Moorer, former chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, warns, "'Unrestricted Warfare' reveals China’s game plan in its coming war with America.” He adds ominously, "China thinks it can destroy America by using these tactics.”
Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub, former chief of staff of U.S. Forces Korea, shares Adm. Moorer’s view.
"The 9/11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many terrorist nations and groups will try to imitate this operation,” Gen. Singlaub said, noting "China’s war book 'Unrestricted Warfare' will be their text.”
Editor's Note: The translation of "Unrestricted Warfare" made for the CIA is not available in print elsewhere – you can get it by Clicking Here. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
China/Taiwan
War on Terrorism
RosevilleCAguy
Unsane
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Posts
- 12,331
busybody said:
Hmm. Maybe we got a 12 volt train on an 6 volt track here.
Didja see 60 minutes last night? Where military personnel and FBI personnel would not do what Clinton wanted them to do re: Getting Osama?
Do you remember how there was no public support to root him out because the Republicans had their faces in Monica's skirt looking for dirt?
You are an Atonotom.
Do you remember how there was no public support to root him out because the Republicans had their faces in Monica's skirt looking for dirt?
You are an Atonotom.
G
Guest
Guest
That's so old.
Purple Haze
Literally Stimulated
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2000
- Posts
- 19,290
Idiot...
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
And not being able to drive and be seen alone on the streets?
And not being able to drive and be seen alone on the streets?
RosevilleCAguy
Unsane
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Posts
- 12,331
Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Not as good as she looks without one. What is your point? The chinese wear bhurkas now?
busybody said:
Not as good as she looks without one. What is your point? The chinese wear bhurkas now?
Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
Olivianna said:
*Note to self: Swallow coffee before reading Oliviana's posts*
So let's see...
China is a 'weak' nation even though they out number us by about a billion to one...
They planned the WTC Attacks and framed Bin Laden as part of a grand scheme to bring about the downfall of the US...
Never should start wearing a burkha...
And liberals are crazy.
Have I got most of that right?
Wouldn't it have made more sense to frame Hussein and use Nukes or Germ Warfare. Let's face it, we lost some people and some pretty cool buildings, but it wasn't exactly the downfall of a city, let alone an entire country.
Spinaroonie
LOOK WHAT I FOUND!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 17,721
Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
The chineese don't wear Burkahs.
BTW, some news organizations said that the PLO took credit. There must be some weird conspiracy or...
NOT EVERYTHING PRINTED IS TRUE
busybody said:
The chineese don't wear Burkahs.
BTW, some news organizations said that the PLO took credit. There must be some weird conspiracy or...
NOT EVERYTHING PRINTED IS TRUE
Bob_Bytchin
Lit Class of '02
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2002
- Posts
- 41,128
The conspiracy goes deeper than China. It goes on to Russia, the Nazi's, and the Kennedy's.
Don't believe me? I'm sure BusyBody can back me up. Damn, he's had too much Thorazine today. Maybe he can tell us tomorrow.
Don't believe me? I'm sure BusyBody can back me up. Damn, he's had too much Thorazine today. Maybe he can tell us tomorrow.
Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Say it Ain't so!!!!
Spinaroonie said:
Say it Ain't so!!!!
Spinaroonie
LOOK WHAT I FOUND!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 17,721
Re: Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
NOT EVERYTHING PRINTED IS TRUE
However
EVERYTHING ON THE INTARNET IS TRUE!!!!!!
pagancowgirl said:
NOT EVERYTHING PRINTED IS TRUE
However
EVERYTHING ON THE INTARNET IS TRUE!!!!!!
RosevilleCAguy
Unsane
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Posts
- 12,331
Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Wow. I'm crushed. Of course, if not everything printed is true, and Spin's quote is printed, it may not be true. If Spin's quote is not true, then everything printed IS true, but that would mean that Spin's quote is not true, which would be a self conflicting statement. It also means that my meds are wearing off and its time for me to get another shot.
Spinaroonie said:
Wow. I'm crushed. Of course, if not everything printed is true, and Spin's quote is printed, it may not be true. If Spin's quote is not true, then everything printed IS true, but that would mean that Spin's quote is not true, which would be a self conflicting statement. It also means that my meds are wearing off and its time for me to get another shot.
RosevilleCAguy
Unsane
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Posts
- 12,331
Re: Re: Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Luckily I'm on the internet. Otherwise I'd be conflicted.
Spinaroonie said:
Luckily I'm on the internet. Otherwise I'd be conflicted.
Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
Re: Re: Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
But wouldn't that mean that as long as I'm viewing it on my screen, it's true... but if I were to send it to the printer and obtain a paper copy... it might not be true???
Spinaroonie said:
But wouldn't that mean that as long as I'm viewing it on my screen, it's true... but if I were to send it to the printer and obtain a paper copy... it might not be true???
RosevilleCAguy
Unsane
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Posts
- 12,331
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Only if you are hooked up to the INTRANET.
pagancowgirl said:
Only if you are hooked up to the INTRANET.
Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Never, how do you think you willlook in a BURKAH?
Ohh... thank the gods I'm not connected to THAT!
RosevilleCAguy said:
Ohh... thank the gods I'm not connected to THAT!
brokenbrainwave
Just draggin around
- Joined
- May 6, 2002
- Posts
- 18,892
moi?
I am a liberal weenie? Who'd thunk that one, lol. Thanks for the laugh, I needed it.
oh yeah, what hazey said....
I am a liberal weenie? Who'd thunk that one, lol. Thanks for the laugh, I needed it.
oh yeah, what hazey said....
Calamity Jane
Reverend Blue Jeans
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 18,421
TWB said:
Nice, but not as nice as other activities involving my ass would be.
