TheEarl
Occasional visitor
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2002
- Posts
- 9,808
This isn't moaning about the preferred age of consent on Lit.
This is a serious question about dirty old man territory. There is an English magazine called FHM (which may or may not go to your country) which runs a 100 Sexiest women poll every year. Readers select who they think are the 10 sexiest women in the world and the most popular 100 choices are immortalised in a booklet thingy with sexy pictures of the ladies in question. So far, so hoopy.
Last year they ran a sidebar talking about some of the weird and wonderful votes polled by some of the readers. These included Michelle Trachtenberg (quite blatantly underage at the time), Anne Widdecombe (child scaring English politician), Marge Simpson (imaginary!) and Charlotte Church. The apparent problem with Charlotte Church was not that she was underage (turned 16 that year), but that many of the FHM readers were lusting for a girl who was only just age of consent and was very nearly still a child.
Charlotte Church is legal according to English law. This sentence made me think about what is and isn't considered acceptable. Me going out with her would be, as I'm only 18 myself. Would a 21 y/o and a 16 y/o be acceptable to you? 31 y/o? 50 y/o? It'd be legal for a 50 y/o to fuck Charlotte Church (and Avril Lavigne, Michelle Trachtenberg, etc if they came over to England), but would you find it acceptable? Or would he be a dirty old man?
More weird and wonderful thoughts from the mind of:
The Earl
This is a serious question about dirty old man territory. There is an English magazine called FHM (which may or may not go to your country) which runs a 100 Sexiest women poll every year. Readers select who they think are the 10 sexiest women in the world and the most popular 100 choices are immortalised in a booklet thingy with sexy pictures of the ladies in question. So far, so hoopy.
Last year they ran a sidebar talking about some of the weird and wonderful votes polled by some of the readers. These included Michelle Trachtenberg (quite blatantly underage at the time), Anne Widdecombe (child scaring English politician), Marge Simpson (imaginary!) and Charlotte Church. The apparent problem with Charlotte Church was not that she was underage (turned 16 that year), but that many of the FHM readers were lusting for a girl who was only just age of consent and was very nearly still a child.
Charlotte Church is legal according to English law. This sentence made me think about what is and isn't considered acceptable. Me going out with her would be, as I'm only 18 myself. Would a 21 y/o and a 16 y/o be acceptable to you? 31 y/o? 50 y/o? It'd be legal for a 50 y/o to fuck Charlotte Church (and Avril Lavigne, Michelle Trachtenberg, etc if they came over to England), but would you find it acceptable? Or would he be a dirty old man?
More weird and wonderful thoughts from the mind of:
The Earl