You want an explanation for why there is going to be a trial, read the link. Or wallow in your own ignorance. Your choice.I did not make a prediction. I asked you to explain what trial you’re referring to. Still waiting for an answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You want an explanation for why there is going to be a trial, read the link. Or wallow in your own ignorance. Your choice.I did not make a prediction. I asked you to explain what trial you’re referring to. Still waiting for an answer.
Yeah, how’s that DOJ investigation going? Can’t recall who the special prosecutor is that Garland named. What’s Biden’s most recent statement on this?Jared Kushner and the Saudis. Let's hear from the Trumpettes on parity and investigations of those around presidents peddling influence. Sure, investigate Hunter Biden. But, for parity sake, let's hear from the board Trumpettes on Jared Kushner and the Saudis. Don't be shy. Step right up. What? I can't hear you.
There is no trial on the docket.You want an explanation for why there is going to be a trial, read the link. Or wallow in your own ignorance. Your choice.
Hmm!?Jared Kushner and the Saudis. Let's hear from the Trumpettes on parity and investigations of those around presidents peddling influence. Sure, investigate Hunter Biden. But, for parity sake, let's hear from the board Trumpettes on Jared Kushner and the Saudis. Don't be shy. Step right up. What? I can't hear you.
That sure didn’t matter to you when it was John Durham.The Special Counsel law requires a Special Counsel must be from outside the government.
According to 28 CFR 600.3 it is illegal to appoint an employee of the government as a Special Counsel. That would exclude both Smith and Weiss.“You see, Weiss had the authority to ask for authority but he never asked for authority, but now he finally asked for authority and was given authority. After 4 years. After a sweetheart plea deal collapsed. After most SoL expired. After whistleblowers exposed their corruption.”
No it doesn't.Weiss appointment as Hunter Biden special counsel violates DOJ regulations, experts warn
Weiss, the sitting U.S. Attorney for Delaware, has been pursuing an investigation into Hunter Biden for years.
By Ben Whedon and Natalia Mittelstadt
Updated: August 12, 2023 - 6:57am
Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment of Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss to serve as special counsel in the Hunter Biden criminal probe is raising alarm with some legal experts who say it explicitly violates the Justice Department's regulations requiring such appointments come from outside the agency.
That regulation states: "An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government."
Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz told the Just the News, No Noise television show Friday night he believed it was a mistake for Garland to name the current Delaware U.S. attorney, both because he was from inside the government and had approved an earlier plea deal for Hunter Biden that spared the first son from prison but was rejected by the trial judge and panned by many as too lenient.
"Someone else, without a doubt, would have followed the regulations of the department, which [is to] say that the person has to be from outside the government," Dershowitz said. "I surely wouldn't have appointed a man from Delaware, where there's a lot of homecooking that goes on -- the Bidens live in Delaware -- who made a sweetheart deal that I predicted on your show would not be accepted. And he's going to want to justify that sweetheart deal. So he's not going to want to admit that he did anything wrong."
More here: https://justthenews.com/government/...special-counsel-violates-dojs-own-regulations
Looks like the media is catching on to the sham cover-up beginning to bloom. The primary objective is to rig the election by tying up Trump in legal proceedings it appears the Democrats know they can't win in the end. Right now we need to open three impeachment proceedings.
Also would have excluded Durham who was appointed by Barr. Guess the notion of following the statutes is foreign concept at the DOJ. This one is particularly egregious given how badly Weiss has fucked up this investigation.According to 28 CFR 600.3 it is illegal to appoint an employee of the government as a Special Counsel. That would exclude both Smith and Weiss.
They didn’t want the one who let statue of limitations expire, tipped off the subject of surprise interviews planned, stonewalled IRS investigators, prohibited questions about other members of the Biden family, and signed off on a sweetheart plea deal that was snuffed by the judge. CBS News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge explains on Face the Nation.I thought the right wanted a special counsel so they could dig deeper into Hunter's affairs? Can they please be consistent for more than a few minutes?
So much for norms, adversarial relationships between the prosecutor and the defense?“You see, Weiss had the authority to ask for authority but he never asked for authority, but now he finally asked for authority and was given authority. After 4 years. After a sweetheart plea deal collapsed. After most SoL expired. After whistleblowers exposed their corruption.”
That's why Garland appointed him pursuant to "general authorities", rather than that specific one. Cynical but legal, and both parties have been doing it for decades.According to 28 CFR 600.3 it is illegal to appoint an employee of the government as a Special Counsel. That would exclude both Smith and Weiss.
It’s quite ironic that VP Biden suggested a FARA charge against Flynn while all along Hunter was knee deep in FARA violations. But hey!!! it’s the Biden crime family.Come back when you've got some legitimate evidence that Hunter Biden did anything worse than fail to pay his taxes and try to buy a gun when he was on a list of people who shouldn't be allowed to. (And lest we forget, those are both crimes that the Republicans think anyone ought to be allowed to get away with...everyone except Hunter Biden, anyway.)
Tax evasion is a felony, knowingly allowing felony violations to run out the statute of limitations is obstruction of justice. Hunter Biden’s tax violations are prima facia cases that could be investigated, charged and in court within months not 5 years. There is plenty of evidence. The DOJ is corrupt but we all know that.Come back when you've got some legitimate evidence that Hunter Biden did anything worse than fail to pay his taxes and try to buy a gun when he was on a list of people who shouldn't be allowed to. (And lest we forget, those are both crimes that the Republicans think anyone ought to be allowed to get away with...everyone except Hunter Biden, anyway.)
The MAGA moron's can't see their own hypocrisy.Again, I have no trouble with going after Hunter Biden--or even Joe Biden if something pops up at the time when he was in office (I would agree that him being pulled in on telephone calls even only to say "hi" to folks Hunter was doing business with would be influence peddling--if Biden was in office at the time. But the instances cited were 2017; he was a private citizen then). What stinks to high heaven here, though, is the Trumpettes drumming away at this in the face of what the Trumps and Kushners do in this realm within consideration by Trumpettes.
Welp, that didn't go anywhere either. Clinton surrogates made sure Sussmann walked.Also would have excluded Durham who was appointed by Barr. Guess the notion of following the statutes is foreign concept at the DOJ. This one is particularly egregious given how badly Weiss has fucked up this investigation
•That's why Garland appointed him pursuant to "general authorities", rather than that specific one. Cynical but legal, and both parties have been doing it for decades.