Advice Goddess flawlessly explains how most women operate

[LJ_Reloaded]

hint: she's a woman, too.

http://www.advicegoddess.com/ag-column-archives/2016/07/unzipping-your.html

So, the women whose children survived to pass on their genes to us were those who vetted men for the ability and willingness to "provide." There was no "wealth" in ancestral times -- no National Bank of the Stone Age. However, evolutionary psychologists believe a modern man's high earnings act as a cue for what women evolved to go for in a man -- high status, meaning high social standing and the ability to bring home the wildebeest steaks for Mommy and the twins.

You, however, claim that a man's status does nothing for you. Now, studies reveal how most people are, not individual differences, so you may be right. However, cognitive neuroscientist Michael Gazzaniga explains that 98 percent of our brain's activity is unconscious -- including some of our decision-making -- but we invent reasons for our choices afterward (typically those that make us seem rational, consistent, and admirable). And research keeps reflecting that women subconsciously prioritize status. In a study by evolutionary psychologist Michael Dunn, women found the exact same man hotter when he was driving a Bentley than when he was driving a Ford Fiesta. Men? They found a woman equally attractive in either car, and frankly, a woman who's hot can probably get dates while "driving" a donkey with bumper stickers on the back.

Next, there's your claim that you and other women are "very aroused" by "gorgeous naked men." Um, sorry, but that's not what the vagina monitor says. Sex researcher Meredith Chivers hooked some ladies up to a machine that measures arousal through blood flow in their ladyparts. Though the women were aroused by footage of sex acts, she also showed them footage of a hot dude exercising naked. The vaginal response: "Yeah, whatevs."

And finally, for the perfect example of how sex differences play out, if a man flashes a woman on the street, it's "You pervert! I'm calling the cops." If a woman does it to a man, it's probably one of the best days he's had in forever: "Wow...it's not even my birthday! How 'bout some yoga poses? Downward-facing dog? Shoulder stand?...Wait. Where are you going? Come back! I think you dropped an earring."

 

[richard_daily]

LT, feeling inadequate, once again.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Scour the interwebs for a single woman that says something LeJackass agrees with, suddenly she speaks for most or all women. Definitely for all feminists.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

LT, feeling inadequate, once again.

LOL you can't refute what she says so you turn full mangina and go after me.

And you still can't get any pussy after trying so damned hard.

 

[someoneyouknow]

http://67.media.tumblr.com/22c819844b615876c2ce12266cb475f3/tumblr_oaw7yxLxNv1rq1pj8o1_500.jpg

 

[Rachel_X]

I can promise you that no amount of money in a guy's bank account will make breed with him.
Nor will his status as doctor astronaut king with top honours.
If said man were to get naked in front of me or flash me in the street, the result will always be the same. He will get kicked so hard in the testicles that his dick will come out of his nose and he will never be able to breed again.

 

[richard_daily]

LOL you can't refute what she says so you turn full mangina and go after me.

And you still can't get any pussy after trying so damned hard.

What's there to refute?

If I spent my time trying to "refute" every person in the world who was an insane nutcase, there would be no time left in the day.

Just like I don't spend time "refuting" busybody's insanity, I don't have time to "refute" yours either.

The core of your issue, is that you'll never find a woman, and if you were lucky enough to, you'd chase her out the door within 5 minutes with your woman-hating attitude.

You know I'm right, and that' really gets you upset.

I'm sorry you're such a small person LT. Small in stature, small in intellect, and small in penis size.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://67.media.tumblr.com/22c819844b615876c2ce12266cb475f3/tumblr_oaw7yxLxNv1rq1pj8o1_500.jpg

Men are a lot more flexible about that than women are.

 

[hashtag45]

lol LJ, the way you're always being trolled..

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

What's there to refute?

What I said was true. What Advice Goddess said was true.

And what is also true is that you spend all this time attacking me and showing off your posts to women in hopes of getting laid and it never, ever works. You know I'm right and THAT pisses you off. Thing is... do you ever wonder why? Or are you THAT lacking in self-awareness?

 

[richard_daily]

What I said was true. What Advice Goddess said was true.

And what is also true is that you spend all this time attacking me and showing off your posts to women in hopes of getting laid and it never, ever works. You know I'm right and THAT pisses you off. Thing is... do you ever wonder why? Or are you THAT lacking in self-awareness?

You live in a small world LT. Pun intended.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Men are a lot more flexible about that than women are.

That's the point.

 

[RoryN]

And research keeps reflecting that women subconsciously prioritize [economic] status.

Within a 100-yard radius of where I'm standing right now, I could find at least 4 long-term couples like the following:

She, a genetically-almost-perfect physical specimen, hauling in somewhere between $50K-$200K per year,

He, a genetically-almost-perfect physical specimen, bringing in $0 to $25K per year. With no car.

Male or female, if you're good-looking and a good piece of ass in bed, a lot of the this is how the sexes act bullshit doesn't apply. It's far more simple than that.

 

[hashtag45]

Lessons about women coming from Rory : The douchebag who sided with creeps against certain female posters, and who blatantly told them, to their face, that they deserved to be harassed at length. For the mere fact that those female posters had the audacity to communicate with political posters whom he disagrees with… .

Oh, the irony of that…

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You live in a small world LT. Pun intended.

Dude you are obsessed with accusing me of being unsuccessful with women because that's the only metric you live by, and you accuse me of living in a small world?

Lemme tell you something you mangina virgin - the women you lust for, I would never want to fuck. I look forward to when they build sex robots and men won't need women for shit at all. Accusing me of being a virgin is like accusing a fish of not being able to ride a bicycle - that's a shameful thing in your world, not mine.

I feel the same way about sex as women do - I won't bust my ass for it and I will not lust after low grade women. That's for you to do.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

For all you dumbasses who claim I'm wrong: hope you don't choke on your words when you read this.

http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/14/12183012/ohlala-paid-dating-app-berlin-pia-poppenreiter-uber

Launched in August 2015, Ohlala is a web-based app that facilitates what it calls "instant paid dating." Male users post offers for dates, consisting of a time, a duration, and how much money they’re willing to pay — a typical offer is from 1–4 hours at an average price of $300. While the request is up, women can decide whether or not they’d like that person to be able to contact them. Crucially, women are not visible to men before they initiate conversation — it’s the inverse of the backpage listings to which it’s often compared. Here, the buyers must come forward first. From there, the couple can chat and discuss the whens and wheres of their impending dates, as well as a payment method and their boundaries, if they so please. (In-app payment is currently in the works, the team tells me.) When the terms are agreed upon, the chat is logged, and presumably both parties are incentivized to show up. Though its on-demand model has earned Ohlala the label "Uber for escorts," the company insists it isn’t an escort agency, or even operating in the adult entertainment space.

.....

In Poppenreiter’s vision, Ohlala is an app for any woman who thinks she ought to be compensated for her time and efforts when she goes out with someone. It seeks to turn leisure time — a precious, dwindling commodity — into billable hours. In that sense, Poppenreiter’s right: her app isn’t really an "Uber for escorts." It’s a TaskRabbit for emotional labor. Perhaps that makes it more radical than anything else — with its tasteful design and young, hip founder, Ohlala suggests a world in which there’s no "kind of woman" who sells her time and affection, because every woman could be that kind of woman.

Investment tip: Put your money into this business. It's going to be as big and well-known as Facebook in 10 years.

 

[richard_daily]

Dude you are obsessed with accusing me of being unsuccessful with women because that's the only metric you live by, and you accuse me of living in a small world?

Lemme tell you something you mangina virgin - the women you lust for, I would never want to fuck. I look forward to when they build sex robots and men won't need women for shit at all. Accusing me of being a virgin is like accusing a fish of not being able to ride a bicycle - that's a shameful thing in your world, not mine.

I feel the same way about sex as women do - I won't bust my ass for it and I will not lust after low grade women. That's for you to do.

You are a never ending source of enjoyment, but you'll never understand why.

The fact that you think the only use for women is sex, is exactly the reason why you never have sex with women.

 

[hashtag45]

Did I just step into an alternative Universe, where all women look like international supermodels and have Mensa IQ's? And they just have to click their fingers, and all men drop at their feet?

What about all the Plain Janes with cellulitis and pimples?

 

[removed9556]

 

[hashtag45]

I agree. But I think that LJ would claim such women, of a given x on the attractiveness scale, would still be more successful than men of the same standard.

I don't think there is any universal attractiveness scale, which is one of the reasons I think he is wrong, but that seems to be the argument - that even less attractive women find it easier to find a partner than equally attractive men.

Indeed.
On a more serious note:
Imo generally women tend to 'marry up', so to speak - they prefer to date someone who is at least as or more successful than they are (whatever their definition of success is: money, status, brains, or so on). Looks are important too, but not as much as they are for men.

Whereas men tend to 'marry down' - they prefer a woman who's lower in status than they are . Cause ego.
When it comes to looks - the reverse: they're all looking for supermodels. Physical attraction being the main reason, but add to that the same as above: ego + they think that they're God's gifts to women

 

[removed9556]

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You are a never ending source of enjoyment, but you'll never understand why.

Funny, how you fail to realize just how much a chew toy you are. You're part of the reason why no one wants to call themselves a feminist anymore.

The fact that you think the only use for women is sex, is exactly the reason why you never have sex with women.

Oh man, I was wondering when you'd throw this one out. You see, unlike most women, I don't hold a utilitarian view of the opposite sex. Most women wouldn't lift a finger to help a man in distress because as dictated by nature a man in distress automatically forfeits his right to help. That's why you never see women's literature featuring fantasies of women jumping on a horse to save some hapless nameless peasant or whatever.

No, son, there is no legitimate use for women, sex or otherwise, simply because human value should not be tied into their usefulness to others. I look forward to sex robots because their proliferation will lead to fewer men trying to use women for sex. I look forward to a day when men do not look to women for sex or reproduction at all and thus interact with women with no consideration of that context. It won't make women useless at all - in fact it will be better for women.

The short term problem women will face in that world is that they won't be able to sexually manipulate men anymore. When women find they cannot sexually manipulate men, all their negotiating power is GONE. But don't worry - being sentient, women will discover how to get around that. Men have survived for millions of years without using sex to manipulate women, women will figure it out in a generation or so. Then sex robots will become a form of women's liberation just as the washer and dryer did.

LOL, did I just fry your tiny brain? Of course I did. I just told you stuff that you will never be able to comprehend. You saw the keywords "woman", "sex" and "robot" and got triggered from here to hell and back. Look at the boilerplate bullshit you just spouted. Now you realize just how fun it is to poke at your inferior intellect.

Oh and I have sex with women. The problem is that you don't, and you never even contest me when I point this out. Because I am right about you. You try so fucking hard and you never succeed no matter how much you genuflect at the altar of the pussy.

Did I just step into an alternative Universe, where all women look like international supermodels and have Mensa IQ's? And they just have to click their fingers, and all men drop at their feet?

What about all the Plain Janes with cellulitis and pimples?

It doesn't matter if you're a supermodel or a Plain Jane, it's not hard for a woman to get laid. You've got to be an honest to God superloser if you're a woman who can't get a man. Honestly. A woman being able to seduce a man is a genetic perk. A woman's problem is always finding a man who is as valuable as she desires.

 

[richard_daily]

Funny, how you fail to realize just how much a chew toy you are. You're part of the reason why no one wants to call themselves a feminist anymore.


Oh man, I was wondering when you'd throw this one out. You see, unlike most women, I don't hold a utilitarian view of the opposite sex. Most women wouldn't lift a finger to help a man in distress because as dictated by nature a man in distress automatically forfeits his right to help. That's why you never see women's literature featuring fantasies of women jumping on a horse to save some hapless nameless peasant or whatever.

No, son, there is no legitimate use for women, sex or otherwise, simply because human value should not be tied into their usefulness to others. I look forward to sex robots because their proliferation will lead to fewer men trying to use women for sex. I look forward to a day when men do not look to women for sex or reproduction at all and thus interact with women with no consideration of that context. It won't make women useless at all - in fact it will be better for women.

The short term problem women will face in that world is that they won't be able to sexually manipulate men anymore. When women find they cannot sexually manipulate men, all their negotiating power is GONE. But don't worry - being sentient, women will discover how to get around that. Men have survived for millions of years without using sex to manipulate women, women will figure it out in a generation or so. Then sex robots will become a form of women's liberation just as the washer and dryer did.

LOL, did I just fry your tiny brain? Of course I did. I just told you stuff that you will never be able to comprehend. You saw the keywords "woman", "sex" and "robot" and got triggered from here to hell and back. Look at the boilerplate bullshit you just spouted. Now you realize just how fun it is to poke at your inferior intellect.

Oh and I have sex with women. The problem is that you don't, and you never even contest me when I point this out. Because I am right about you. You try so fucking hard and you never succeed no matter how much you genuflect at the altar of the pussy.



It doesn't matter if you're a supermodel or a Plain Jane, it's not hard for a woman to get laid. You've got to be an honest to God superloser if you're a woman who can't get a man. Honestly. A woman being able to seduce a man is a genetic perk. A woman's problem is always finding a man who is as valuable as she desires.

The rest of your rambling post is really pointless.

Let's get to the bold part, where your true feelings come out.

You feel that women are useless.

Yet you can't stop talking about them.

So, how does it feel to spend so much of your time and energy on something "useless"?

You need women, way more than they need you, LT.

Everyone sees that, clear as day.

That's not an issue with women, that's an issue with your uselessness. Not because you're a man, mind you.... this is a personal problem of yours.

Enjoy your "sex robot" fantasies.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Uh, LT fried my brain, so let me get back to buzzword bingo!

Fixed your post.

You need women, way more than they need you, LT.

Nah, porn is better than most women.
Pussy is overrated.

 

[richard_daily]

Nah, porn is better than most women.
Pussy is overrated.

Now there's a serious case of sour grapes.