12 days for raping a 60 year old?

So 12 days is how long a rapist should writhe in agony before he's put out of his misery?

Sounds 'bout right to me. ;)
 
You haven't been around a lot lately, opinionated old fart. I'm glad you're back.

Now, as I understand trolling, I'm supposed to disagree with what you just said, is that right?

12 days? What, are you crazy?
 
Edited to apologise and pull my foot out of my mouth
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry shereads but this is one of the, if not THE, worst parody threads ever. :(

Snoopy
 
Yeah, boxo, she's sick, but her postings almost always make a kind of depraved sense. You of virtue may not appreciate truly corrupt exchange of views.
 
I'm afraid that MY PERSONAl savior, the lord high, supreme Biscuitwarmer has told me, alone, personally that all that anyone says anytime is a personal affront to him and all the right minded people of the world. Why don't you move back to the Land of Infinite Pants all you human goatherders.

ALSO, it should be self evident (though I'm sure those of (fe)male persuasion wouldn't understand being of little mind) (ditto if your a darkie or a member of the cannibal tribes) that CHEESE, the personal devil tool of Hollywood Socialists, the French, and the cult of Wisconsin is responsible for all that is wrong with Pakistan or is it America...Britain? Oh well, if you disagree you're a fuckwit.

P.S. Is this your story? It's a piece of shit. My dog could write better than you. You should drown your children so they won't inherit your bad writing style because its so bad. DO YOU HEAR ME, RAY BRADBURY?

P.P.S. You're all damn communists, stay away from dark alleys. Fuckers
 
boxo sez:
You know, I'm sure I don't stand alone here.

A twelve year old girl gets raped, and you find it funny to mock the original thread by changing the title?

You are one sick fuck shereads!!

How it could possible be amusing, be it a twelve or sixty year old that gets raped is beyond comprehension.

You just lost all credibility I once held for you.

You're fucking sick
Credibility is not held for someone. Your syntax!

If you had read the 12-year-old thread, you might be less scandalized about this. Get off your high horse and go read it. While you're there, read the "a musing about trolls" thread, which is really what the current thread is about, despite its title.

That ought to keep you occupied awhile. Once you have the context and understand the usage rules for "credibility" you are welcome to come back and have your say.

We will then find, I'm sure, that shereads will be gracious, as usual, and accept your apology.

And her credibility is such that when she does, we will know she's sincere.
 
So it looks like you should get something like 24 days for raping a 24 years old. Or something like that.

---dr.M.
 
I don't think the definition of "trolling" is disagreeing with someone. But then, I was completely unuaware of the word until just a few days ago.

mlle
 
boxofrocks said:
You know, I'm sure I don't stand alone here.

A twelve year old girl gets raped, and you find it funny to mock the original thread by changing the title?

You are one sick fuck shereads!!

How it could possible be amusing, be it a twelve or sixty year old that gets raped is beyond comprehension.

You just lost all credibility I once held for you.

You're fucking sick

Whatever you do, be sure you don't stand alone. Go with the crowd, as a display of courage.

Thank you for proving to me that trolling really does work to bring out the worst in people. Yeah, I'm in favor of child rape. It amuses me. Conveying that was one purpose of this thread; the other was to help cure myself of the need to fall for trolls like amicus, by seeing what it's like to bait someone with an absurd statement, then sit back and watch people make asses of themselves over something so obvious.

Amicus must have been laughing his ass off all these weeks. Beyond comprehension, indeed.
 
Lucifer_Carroll said:
I'm afraid that MY PERSONAl savior, the lord high, supreme Biscuitwarmer has told me, alone, personally that all that anyone says anytime is a personal affront to him and all the right minded people of the world. Why don't you move back to the Land of Infinite Pants all you human goatherders.

ALSO, it should be self evident (though I'm sure those of (fe)male persuasion wouldn't understand being of little mind) (ditto if your a darkie or a member of the cannibal tribes) that CHEESE, the personal devil tool of Hollywood Socialists, the French, and the cult of Wisconsin is responsible for all that is wrong with Pakistan or is it America...Britain? Oh well, if you disagree you're a fuckwit.

P.S. Is this your story? It's a piece of shit. My dog could write better than you. You should drown your children so they won't inherit your bad writing style because its so bad. DO YOU HEAR ME, RAY BRADBURY?

P.P.S. You're all damn communists, stay away from dark alleys. Fuckers

You, on the other hand, restore my faith in humankind. How perverse is that?
 
cantdog said:
Credibility is not held for someone. Your syntax!

If you had read the 12-year-old thread, you might be less scandalized about this. Get off your high horse and go read it. While you're there, read the "a musing about trolls" thread, which is really what the current thread is about, despite its title.

That ought to keep you occupied awhile. Once you have the context and understand the usage rules for "credibility" you are welcome to come back and have your say.

We will then find, I'm sure, that shereads will be gracious, as usual, and accept your apology.

And her credibility is such that when she does, we will know she's sincere.

Let's get naked and make Jello shots.
 
Isn't cant wonderful?

I laughed when I saw your thread title and had to immediately stop in for a look.

Well done!


Oh wait - I'm supposed to disagree with you, aren't I?

(I just don't have this trolling thing down properly yet!)

I'll practice -

;)
 
Re: Isn't cant wonderful?

sweetsubsarahh said:
I laughed when I saw your thread title and had to immediately stop in for a look.
I keep on clicking on it, thinking it's the other thread. Hello dyslexia, nice to meet you again after all these years. :rolleyes:

#L

ps. boxof and Snoop has a point there though. Albeit knee-jerk overreacted. It was a pretty tasteless title. Ya gotta understand how some would react, even though they might still be getting the point of your post. I had my hopes high for you, that you'd be the first troll in the histroy of ma...troll-kind to do it with...well...class. :D
 
SheReades,
I bow before your sardonic wit. You caught my attention with this one. One thing though, lets not allow the American Judicial system see this okay? They might just get ideas.

Cat

P.S. I loved it.:rose: :rose: :rose:
 
shereads said:
Offering you Jello shots. Cantdog made these while naked.
Holy schmoly I'm clueless. Never heard of a jello shot before. Wut are those?
 
A nutritious dessert. They make me throw up, but others seem to enjoy them.

Jello shots
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ingredients:

* 2 cups Vodka
* 3 packages Jello with sugar
* 3 cups Water

Mixing instructions:

Boil 3 cups of water then add jello. Mix jello and water until jello is completely disolved. Add the two cups of vodka and mix together. Pour mixture into plastic shot glasses and chill until firm.
 
Got Vodka and water.

I wonder if I can buy Jello in this god-forsaken backwater of civilisation.
 
Back
Top