███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

Anyone else notice where Russia gave him the most help with Manafort’s guidance?WI, MI, PA, and MN. He loses all four next time around when he has to win them on his own.

Manafort will be no doubt land on his feet when he does his bit.
Unless he's Vince Fostered.
 
Mueller left impeachment breadcrumbs, if Democrats choose to follow

A grizzled G-Man out of the central casting era dropped anachronistically into the viral-clip moment of cable-televised clapbacks, Mueller immediately dispelled the notion that he had cleared the president of wrongdoing.

No," he said when House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler asked if he had totally exonerated the president, as Trump has frequently claimed. Then, over the course of seven hours, testifying before two committees, Mueller would intimate that there was evidence of conspiracy between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign, acknowledge with the simple word "true" that he found it unethical and wrong for a campaign to accept assistance from a hostile foreign power, and repeatedly suggest strongly that the president obstructed justice.

For all the star power Mueller lacked, he offered up just as much in the way of substance.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...d-impeachment-bread-crumbs-democrats-n1034216
 
Mueller left impeachment breadcrumbs, if Democrats choose to follow

A grizzled G-Man out of the central casting era dropped anachronistically into the viral-clip moment of cable-televised clapbacks, Mueller immediately dispelled the notion that he had cleared the president of wrongdoing.

No," he said when House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler asked if he had totally exonerated the president, as Trump has frequently claimed. Then, over the course of seven hours, testifying before two committees, Mueller would intimate that there was evidence of conspiracy between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign, acknowledge with the simple word "true" that he found it unethical and wrong for a campaign to accept assistance from a hostile foreign power, and repeatedly suggest strongly that the president obstructed justice.

For all the star power Mueller lacked, he offered up just as much in the way of substance.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...d-impeachment-bread-crumbs-democrats-n1034216

The only place you'll find bread crumbs is in the fairy tale Hansel and Gretal which you obviously confused with reality.:rolleyes:
 
Obviously, you're too ignorant to be taken seriously. There aren't 80,000 electoral votes.:rolleyes:

No shit Sherlock. If you had half a brain you'd have realized that I was talking about individual votes. He won an electoral victory by 80,000 citizen votes. Obviously, you're too ignorant to be taken seriously. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Anyone else notice where Russia gave him the most help with Manafort’s guidance?WI, MI, PA, and MN. He loses all four next time around when he has to win them on his own.

That's a hilariously preposterous idea.

You are saying that without the Trump campaigns information about polling (which, again, the Trump campaign put together with no help from Rooooskies, obviously) the Roooskies would not know where to "help" the campaign with their expert Russian-level special expertise on American election messaging and delivery.

These magic Rooskies know better than the highest paid, most experienced political consultants on the planet hired for the most money ever spent on any election in the history of the planet.

Further, the Rooskies knew just which midwestern voters to reach out and target, and how to appeal to each individually, a process the famous Russian, Karl Rove, pioneered called micro-targeting.

Then, these evil Russians had to *somehow* convince HRC to stay out of those States. HRC who was told she had a 95% chance of winning by the polls that were both disingenuously using modeling from Obama, when everyone knew blacks were not showing up for HRC like that did because, and only because BHO looked black...and...because Trump supporters were (and still are) so vilified that polling them is impossible..

Yes your insightful analysis is brilliant . It must be because the Russians did some magic thing that the Trump campaign couldn't do and prevented HRC from doing anything to try to not lose those States.

I don't know how many times I have to say this but the DNC spent millions of dollars on a post-mortem analysis to figure out why they're horrible candidate lost and it comes down to her being a horrible candidate her hubris at assuming that she would win and her ignoring key States. Nowhere in that analysis did Russian influence come into play. At all.

You also ignore the fact that they had pro-hillary messages running. They were simply trying to angry at the electorate they didn't have any delusions of grandeur that they were going to tilt anything. The point of it all was to sow unrest. Black lives matters was not promoted by them to elect Trump, black lives matter was to sow discord.
 
No shit Sherlock. If you had half a brain you'd have realized that I was talking about individual votes. He won an electoral victory by 80,000 citizen votes. Obviously, you're too ignorant to be taken seriously. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

It's more obvious, shit for brains, you need to learn how to write with specificity. So, get with it and shut the fuck up.
 
No shit Sherlock. If you had half a brain you'd have realized that I was talking about individual votes. He won an electoral victory by 80,000 citizen votes. Obviously, you're too ignorant to be taken seriously. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

That's a pretty twisted way of looking at it. All you're saying is that with the benefit of hindsight if Hillary had worked a little harder on 80,000 people she could have changed the election. The problem with that idea is no one knows until afterwards where they need to concentrate time money and effort. Spending any money at all in California is a write-off. Which Trump wisely avoided other than the idea that a few swings through there sometimes can get a republican some fundraising money but you're not going there with the idea that you're going to influence the number of Dem voters, including, no doubt, illegal aliens that are voting in California.

It's not like you can find those particular magic 80,000 voters and just convince them to vote the other way the next time around. It'll be a different 80,000 votes in a different place.

Republican victories are always going to have those sort of margins because the Democrats have a lock on the majority of major population centers. Getting more warm bodies to vote for you is meaningless.

Hillary lost while out spending Trump almost two-to-one. Let's say for the sake of discussion that she'd been smarter as a human being a candidate and as a campaign. And she'd somehow figure it out all that magic information that the Trump campaign gave to the Russians to tilt this thing and she worked a little harder and got 80,000 in one of those people to change their votes so she won by one vote. Nobody would then be talking about her razor-thin margin in those States. They will be pointing at her winning the popular vote and winning the Electoral College and saying okay yeah that makes sense.

Cherry picking all the should have could have would have that is unavailable until after the election is just plain silly. Trump outworked her and he earned the election. She was too sick too tired too lazy and too arrogant to win that election
 
Last edited:
Women can be sore losers.

"Truthiness" - Luk1

"Veritaymousness a-skippity-scat-a-jivemo (<gif>*4)" - A-Gif-Is-Worth-10,000-Yaps-Zumi

Just look at adrina's meltdown in the crushing blurt loss.
 
Last edited:
"Truthiness" - Luk1

"Veritaymousness a-skippity-scat-a-jivemo (<gif>*4)" - A-Gif-Is-Worth-10,000-Yaps-Zumi

Just look at adrian's meltdown in the crushing blurt loss.


All over a thread on a message board.

To be fair, I could have used lube.
 
The only place you'll find bread crumbs is in the fairy tale Hansel and Gretal which you obviously confused with reality.:rolleyes:
Those aren’t real bread crumbs. It’s a fairytale. Obviously, you’re too stupid to discuss bread crumbs.
 
Your reading comprehension deficiencies aren’t my problem.

Discussing what you ACTUALLY wrote is not the same as you failing to write what you intended to mean.


Please try and keep up with the rest of the class.
 
That's a pretty twisted way of looking at it. All you're saying is...

Whoa there pardner, pull the reins in a bit. I'm didn't say what you are saying I said.

RG said Americans are getting tired of Dems shit. As in Real Americans, the Majority of Americans. All I did was remind him that Trump won the electoral vote by the slimmest of margins. The majority of Americans did not vote for him.
 
Discussing what you ACTUALLY wrote is not the same as you failing to write what you intended to mean.


Please try and keep up with the rest of the class.

Sorry to see you also fail at reading comprehension and critical thinking.

Have a blessed day. :)
 
Whoa there pardner, pull the reins in a bit. I'm didn't say what you are saying I said.

RG said Americans are getting tired of Dems shit. As in Real Americans, the Majority of Americans. All I did was remind him that Trump won the electoral vote by the slimmest of margins. The majority of Americans did not vote for him.

Clinton NEVER won the majority of Americans either


Means shit, NIGGER
 
Back
Top