“Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books

Oh, yes, that's another thing . . .

NaturalNews.com[note 2] and its sister sites are run by Michael Allen "Mike" Adams, B.S.[3] (1969 or 1967–)[4] (self-labeled "The Health Ranger") which promotes alternative medicine and related conspiracy theories.[5] The site particularly specializes in vaccine denial and the alleged vaccines-autism link,[6] AIDS/HIV denialism,[7] quack cancer treatments,[8] and conspiracy theories about "Big Pharma".[9] If there's an alternative medicine or alternative medical treatment out there, you can guarantee that NaturalNews has one article singing its praises to the sky and one more bashing the stupid "skeptics". A lot of the website's growth is due to its exposure on Facebook, where it had over 3.5 million followers[note 3] until it was banned (not for any of its content, mind you, but because it was violating Facebook's policy on spamming).[10]

Reviewing NaturalNews' vast ecosystem of websites shows that Adams has way too much money and spare time and wants to attract both left-wing moonbats interested in a "natural" lifestyle and right-wing wingnuts interested in guns and survivalism. Reading through Adams' discourse on a non-NaturalNews affiliated goldbug forum shows that Adams's personal allegiances are mainly with the latter,[1] which taken in totality indicates some level of disingenuousness since he's grifting both ends but only sympathizes with one end enough to speak frankly.

On Wikipedia, NaturalNews is not merely a deprecated source, never to be used for anything ("There is a near-unanimous consensus that the site repeatedly publishes false or fabricated information, including a large number of conspiracy theories."),[11] but is actually on the spam blacklist.[12]

In short: if you cite NaturalNews on any matter whatsoever, you are almost certainly wrong, as this website is so bad, so unreliable, and so dead-faced wrong that even other quacks think it's a quack site,[13] a feat of stupid that truly takes talent.
Yes, new media is being formed all over the world in order to fill the credibility gap left by the Democrat controlled bullshitting networks and other legacy gaslighting media. Get used to it.

PS: CNN laid off hundreds a couple of months ago and are preparing to lay off hundreds more as we speak. Why, you ask? You and your friends are not enough people to support the failing venture. As is the way of the world, smart people are moving on while the mentally destitute are left blinded and helpless in the dust.
 
I know it's sorta scary but I thought you MAGA clowns love to live in constant fear
Aren't you lefties the ones screaming we're all gonna die because the world will warm up a couple degrees in the next hundred years?
 

The Whole “Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books​

By S.D. Wells, Natural News • Jan. 24, 2025

  • School science curriculums are accused of promoting “fake science” by pushing unproven theories of global warming and climate change as solid facts.
  • The movement behind climate change is seen as a conspiracy by truth media and honest scientists, and wealthy elites who promote “going green” are hypocritical as they engage in environmentally contradictory behaviors.
  • There is a call to remove climate change teachings from school curriculums, viewing it as a hoax and an agenda-driven narrative rather than a scientifically backed phenomenon.
(Natural News)—Step foot into any school, public or private, at any level, including elementary, middle, or high school, and open a science book and what do you find? Fake science. There are gobs of lessons, lesson plans, supplementary materials, projects, experiments, illustrations and videos that support the unproven (conspiracy) theory of global warming. Children and teens alike have brains like sponges, that are absorbing all of this and wondering how they can write a report, create a project, do their own presentation, and contribute on the local, regional, and global scale to a cause that most likely doesn’t even change anything. What a shame.

The entire global warming hoax had to have its name restructured to “climate change” when truth news exposed the fake temperature charts and the cherry-picked heat data that fit the narrative of the biggest Ponzi scheme ever invented and perpetuated. The richest elite on the planet fly around the world on their fuel-burning private jets and cruise around the globe on their gas-guzzling yachts while preaching to America’s youth about “going green” to save humanity and the earth from bursting into flames in the next ten years.

More here: https://thelibertydaily.com/whole-climate-change-hoax-needs-be-removed-all/

Way past due.
It's called conditioning. I believe Global warming statistics are legitimate, how to adjust using common sense is the issue. If these climate cultist flying around in their magic carpets weren't such f@@cking hypocrites and attacked the problem with common sense remedies there wouldn't be such a backlash.

You have to wonder how much effect the LA fires will have on the eco systems. Zealot environmentalist policies causing more damage in one month, welp, you know what I mean. I'm sure the numbers will be made public eventually. An ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of cure.

A relaxing melody

 
Last edited:
As a country, removing science from textbooks will lead to other countries taking the lead on scientific talent.
 
Technically. But if you held a basketball of the exact same shape, you would call it round.
On the other hand, because it's not a perfect sphere, the point on the Earth where you can stand farthest from the centre of the planet is the summit of Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador (you know, near the equator!) not the top of mount Everest. I wonder if the air is even thinner there?
 

The Whole “Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books​

By S.D. Wells, Natural News • Jan. 24, 2025

  • School science curriculums are accused of promoting “fake science” by pushing unproven theories of global warming and climate change as solid facts.
  • The movement behind climate change is seen as a conspiracy by truth media and honest scientists, and wealthy elites who promote “going green” are hypocritical as they engage in environmentally contradictory behaviors.
  • There is a call to remove climate change teachings from school curriculums, viewing it as a hoax and an agenda-driven narrative rather than a scientifically backed phenomenon.
(Natural News)—Step foot into any school, public or private, at any level, including elementary, middle, or high school, and open a science book and what do you find? Fake science. There are gobs of lessons, lesson plans, supplementary materials, projects, experiments, illustrations and videos that support the unproven (conspiracy) theory of global warming. Children and teens alike have brains like sponges, that are absorbing all of this and wondering how they can write a report, create a project, do their own presentation, and contribute on the local, regional, and global scale to a cause that most likely doesn’t even change anything. What a shame.

The entire global warming hoax had to have its name restructured to “climate change” when truth news exposed the fake temperature charts and the cherry-picked heat data that fit the narrative of the biggest Ponzi scheme ever invented and perpetuated. The richest elite on the planet fly around the world on their fuel-burning private jets and cruise around the globe on their gas-guzzling yachts while preaching to America’s youth about “going green” to save humanity and the earth from bursting into flames in the next ten years.

More here: https://thelibertydaily.com/whole-climate-change-hoax-needs-be-removed-all/

Way past due.
On the other hand, you can't deny that such things as coal-fired power plants and internal-combustion engines contribute lots of noxious pollutants to our environment (thank goodness lead, at least, was taken out of petrol - some studies say unleaded petrol may have resulted in an increase in average intelligence!). Probably a good thing to replace them with non-polluting sources of energy and means of transport, wouldn't you agree?
 
As a country, removing science from textbooks will lead to other countries taking the lead on scientific talent.
When countries do that, it never leads to anything good. Right now, China is larding textbooks and examinations with "Xi Jinping Thought" because they prefer indoctrination to education. The whole world is going to to the bloody bow-wows!
 
See also Wikipedia:

There is a nearly unanimous scientific consensus that the Earth has been consistently warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution, that the rate of recent warming is largely unprecedented,[1]: 8 [2]: 11  and that this warming is mainly the result of a rapid increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) caused by human activities. The human activities causing this warming include fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and land use changes such as deforestation,[3]: 10–11  with a significant supporting role from the other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide.[1]: 7  This human role in climate change is considered "unequivocal" and "incontrovertible".[1]: 4 [2]: 4 

Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change.[4][5] Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%,[6] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change.[7] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus often contained errors or could not be replicated.[8]

The evidence for global warming due to human influence has been recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries.[9] In the scientific literature, there is a very strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.[10] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.[11] A few organizations with members in extractive industries hold non-committal positions,[12] and some have tried to persuade the public that climate change is not happening, or if the climate is changing it is not because of human influence,[13][14] attempting to sow doubt in the scientific consensus.[15]
 
See also Wikipedia:

There is a nearly unanimous scientific consensus that the Earth has been consistently warming since the start of the Industrial Revolution, that the rate of recent warming is largely unprecedented,[1]: 8 [2]: 11  and that this warming is mainly the result of a rapid increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) caused by human activities. The human activities causing this warming include fossil fuel combustion, cement production, and land use changes such as deforestation,[3]: 10–11  with a significant supporting role from the other greenhouse gases such as methane and nitrous oxide.[1]: 7  This human role in climate change is considered "unequivocal" and "incontrovertible".[1]: 4 [2]: 4 

Nearly all actively publishing climate scientists say humans are causing climate change.[4][5] Surveys of the scientific literature are another way to measure scientific consensus. A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%,[6] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change.[7] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus often contained errors or could not be replicated.[8]

The evidence for global warming due to human influence has been recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized countries.[9] In the scientific literature, there is a very strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.[10] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.[11] A few organizations with members in extractive industries hold non-committal positions,[12] and some have tried to persuade the public that climate change is not happening, or if the climate is changing it is not because of human influence,[13][14] attempting to sow doubt in the scientific consensus.[15]
I think everyone pretty much agrees with that, even the ones who claim that global warming is some kind of hoax. But the question is how to persuade people to take action? Predictions of disaster far off in the future don't seem to motivate people (perhaps that's why christian millenniarists always predict their rapture is coming real soon now?).

Predictions of near-term changes, like those wild claims of winter snows being a "thing of the past," are so exaggerated that they backfire.

Attempts to claim that disasters like hurricane Katrina are the result of global warming don't resonate. After all, it was only a category three storm when it made landfall, of the kind that has been hitting the Americas for centuries (early French settlers of New Orléans sent back plaintive requests to return home because of the dreadful weather, only to be told that they had to hold on to the valuable port city) and the horrific casualties were the result of incompetent politicians who allowed uncontrolled development in flood-prone areas and spent levée maintenance money on Mardi Gras celebrations. And that's not even mentioning the recent 20cm snowfall in the city!

No. Tell people that pollution is bad, and they have to close the fossil fuel power stations and switch to electric cars in order to save themselves from lung cancer. That resonates. Think about how (comparatively) easy it was to remove lead additives from petrol by demonstrating the health hazard.
 
I think everyone pretty much agrees with that, even the ones who claim that global warming is some kind of hoax. But the question is how to persuade people to take action? Predictions of disaster far off in the future don't seem to motivate people (perhaps that's why christian millenniarists always predict their rapture is coming real soon now?).

Predictions of near-term changes, like those wild claims of winter snows being a "thing of the past," are so exaggerated that they backfire.

Attempts to claim that disasters like hurricane Katrina are the result of global warming don't resonate. After all, it was only a category three storm when it made landfall, of the kind that has been hitting the Americas for centuries (early French settlers of New Orléans sent back plaintive requests to return home because of the dreadful weather, only to be told that they had to hold on to the valuable port city) and the horrific casualties were the result of incompetent politicians who allowed uncontrolled development in flood-prone areas and spent levée maintenance money on Mardi Gras celebrations. And that's not even mentioning the recent 20cm snowfall in the city!

No. Tell people that pollution is bad, and they have to close the fossil fuel power stations and switch to electric cars in order to save themselves from lung cancer. That resonates. Think about how (comparatively) easy it was to remove lead additives from petrol by demonstrating the health hazard.
There’s no need to make predictions of the far off future, we can see the evidence that it’s happening now. 1739112949784.jpeg
 
LOL!!!! He’s a psychologist!!!! Classic Ish.
And you're a moron making him imminently more qualified than you.

Further, you didn't watch the clip so you are speaking from abject ignorance.....................but that's what you usually do anyway.
 
Back
Top