rosco rathbone
1. f3e5 2. g4??
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Posts
- 42,430
I always hated the term "Dom". It gives me funny, non-sexual pictures. I think of the cartoon torturer or executioner with the black pointy hood with eye-holes, big hairy belly and pointy elf shoes. There's always some skinny, long-bearded unfortunate hanging up by his thumbs. If you wanted to insult a fat Dominate Master, you could call him "Dom DeLuise".
I like sexual violence and control, I'm interested in torture tools and techniques. I have fantasies of control outside the explicitly sexual realm, and many ideas, plans and inspirations regarding this-but I can't call myself a "Dom", because it sounds both pretentious and just plain goofy as shit. Thus, I have created Topopolis as an alternative to the Dominate's Lounge and a forum for anyone else who feels like me.
If there are no such people here, I will just carry on talking to myself, safe in the confines of the Topopolis city limits.
To kick things off, a brief essay by me:
I believe that women will soon be unnecessary to men. First, consider the sum total of heterosexual copulations. Subtract those intended to cause pregnancy, which, we can assume for the purposes of this argument, is important to the survival of the race. Subtract also the tiny number of copulations enjoyable to gnomes for reasons currently unduplicable by science most despicable: sexual acts in which the presence of a live female body contributes something that cannot be imitated satisfactorily. I won’t exaggerate to make my point-there IS a small subset of copulations both beneficial and enjoyable to gnomes which, at least at the present state of the art, requires the participation of a flesh and blood woman.
Having made these calculations, with the most liberal allowances, one is left with the stark fact most heterosexual copulations do not require a live, biological female as a participant in order to be enjoyable to gnomes. Furthermore, in many cases, such as married life, the presence of a female puppetmind before, during and after ejaculation is a strongly negative factor.
So far, I have only spoken of copulations that actually occur. The most important copulations to consider in the light of my ideas are THOSE WHICH HAVE NOT OCCURRED, that is to say, those that take place within the inner psychosexual lives of gnomes, who, as everyone knows, are victims of a dilemma: trapped on one hand by a river of force which demands the brute satisfaction of needs, certain on the other hand of a disastrous outcome to any involvement with female “beings” currently credited with free will and full powers of rational thought, and now rendered roughly 90% supernumerary by my latest theories.
I forsee the establishment, by visionary entrepreneurs perhaps unborn, of bordellos staffed by anatomically correct sexual dolls, and someday, cyborgs or androids. The invention of the Real Doll, of which more anon, was but the first salvo in the coming war between the sexes in which technology will play its usual defining role.
(for Valerie)
rosco
I like sexual violence and control, I'm interested in torture tools and techniques. I have fantasies of control outside the explicitly sexual realm, and many ideas, plans and inspirations regarding this-but I can't call myself a "Dom", because it sounds both pretentious and just plain goofy as shit. Thus, I have created Topopolis as an alternative to the Dominate's Lounge and a forum for anyone else who feels like me.
If there are no such people here, I will just carry on talking to myself, safe in the confines of the Topopolis city limits.
To kick things off, a brief essay by me:
I believe that women will soon be unnecessary to men. First, consider the sum total of heterosexual copulations. Subtract those intended to cause pregnancy, which, we can assume for the purposes of this argument, is important to the survival of the race. Subtract also the tiny number of copulations enjoyable to gnomes for reasons currently unduplicable by science most despicable: sexual acts in which the presence of a live female body contributes something that cannot be imitated satisfactorily. I won’t exaggerate to make my point-there IS a small subset of copulations both beneficial and enjoyable to gnomes which, at least at the present state of the art, requires the participation of a flesh and blood woman.
Having made these calculations, with the most liberal allowances, one is left with the stark fact most heterosexual copulations do not require a live, biological female as a participant in order to be enjoyable to gnomes. Furthermore, in many cases, such as married life, the presence of a female puppetmind before, during and after ejaculation is a strongly negative factor.
So far, I have only spoken of copulations that actually occur. The most important copulations to consider in the light of my ideas are THOSE WHICH HAVE NOT OCCURRED, that is to say, those that take place within the inner psychosexual lives of gnomes, who, as everyone knows, are victims of a dilemma: trapped on one hand by a river of force which demands the brute satisfaction of needs, certain on the other hand of a disastrous outcome to any involvement with female “beings” currently credited with free will and full powers of rational thought, and now rendered roughly 90% supernumerary by my latest theories.
I forsee the establishment, by visionary entrepreneurs perhaps unborn, of bordellos staffed by anatomically correct sexual dolls, and someday, cyborgs or androids. The invention of the Real Doll, of which more anon, was but the first salvo in the coming war between the sexes in which technology will play its usual defining role.
(for Valerie)
rosco