Manly men sex: Matt Gaetz, Pete Hegsex, etc

[Lance_Castro]

Got your juris doctorate at the same place as Arphy? Those aren't the facts introduced into evidence. Just your slant on it to agree with yourself in those 'I agree with you.' padded cell conversations you hold in private conversations.

Ooooo mister bitchy!

It aint over yet, cuntface.

CNN-

“Merchan granted Trump’s request to file a motion to dismiss the case, ordering his legal team to submit their papers by December 2”

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Ooooo mister bitchy!

It aint over yet, cuntface.

CNN-

“Merchan granted Trump’s request to file a motion to dismiss the case, ordering his legal team to submit their papers by December 2”

Been a good month for the comeback kid.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Been a good month for the comeback kid.

He’s the OG Scofflaw!

 

[Bray123]

If you say 'granted permission to file a motion' quickly enough it sounds as if the case has already been dismissed.

The first President in history to be on bail and the first to have a probation officer. Has he had his interview yet to discuss his desired change of employment?

 

[Lance_Castro]

If you say 'granted permission to file a motion' quickly enough it sounds as if the case has already been dismissed.

The first President in history to be on bail and the first to have a probation officer. Has he had his interview yet to discuss his desired change of employment?

There is a valid argument to be made that this particular prosecution was stinky from the get-go… lots of non maga mouth foamer legal analysts agreed.

 

[jomar]

not so fast…. The stormy daniels convictions might get vacated yet!

That was a stupid case anyway. It isnt criminal to pay a whore to stay quiet.

Sleazy yes! Criminal? Borderline.

Paying her wasn’t the crime. It was the financial monte how she got paid. Still, it was a NY thing and probably if not trump wouldn’t have happened. He’s not loved there.

 

[Lance_Castro]

That wasn’t the crime. It was the financial monte how she got paid. Still, it was a NY thing and probably if not trump wouldn’t have happened. He’s not loved there.

Hush money, at worst, was usually a campaign finance no-no.

It was a hit job.

 

[Politruk]

Hush money, at worst, was usually a campaign finance no-no.

It was a hit job.

Prosecution on campaign-finance charges, as such, is perfectly legit.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Prosecution on campaign-finance charges, as such, is perfectly legit.

Hush money payments are common and legal and he was never charged with campaign finance violations.

 

[dmallord]

Hush money payments are common and legal and he was never charged with campaign finance violations.

Laughing over here... He was charged and convicted of that in 34 felony counts.

A Free Speech for People article provides a good, easily understood summary [unless you are close-minded.]

"Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, Trump’s hush-money payments constituted campaign spending. Trump’s affairs with these women had ended years ago; Cohen contacted them in 2016 because Trump’s team worried that disclosure during the campaign season might damage him politically. That was a reasonable fear; after all, similar revelations about Bill Clinton’s infidelities had nearly derailed his 1992 presidential bid. (This was also before Trump’s “grab them by the pussy” video was released.) So paying these ex-lovers to keep silent helped his campaign—exactly the sort of expense that Trump’s campaign was legally required to disclose on campaign spending reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.

"Wait, you may say—disclosing that he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to ex-lovers to buy their silence would defeat the purpose of the payments. After all, he spent the money to keep secrets, not to reveal them. But that is the price you pay when you decide to run for President of the United States: you are legally obligated to disclose certain matters that a purely private citizen might keep secret. So Trump’s failure to report these expenses violated the Federal Election Campaign Act."

So... he was charged, buddy.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Laughing over here... He was charged and convicted of that in 34 felony counts.

A Free Speech for People article provides a good, easily understood summary [unless you are close-minded.]

"Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, Trump’s hush-money payments constituted campaign spending. Trump’s affairs with these women had ended years ago; Cohen contacted them in 2016 because Trump’s team worried that disclosure during the campaign season might damage him politically. That was a reasonable fear; after all, similar revelations about Bill Clinton’s infidelities had nearly derailed his 1992 presidential bid. (This was also before Trump’s “grab them by the pussy” video was released.) So paying these ex-lovers to keep silent helped his campaign—exactly the sort of expense that Trump’s campaign was legally required to disclose on campaign spending reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.

"Wait, you may say—disclosing that he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to ex-lovers to buy their silence would defeat the purpose of the payments. After all, he spent the money to keep secrets, not to reveal them. But that is the price you pay when you decide to run for President of the United States: you are legally obligated to disclose certain matters that a purely private citizen might keep secret. So Trump’s failure to report these expenses violated the Federal Election Campaign Act."

So... he was charged, buddy.

The FEC, not states, enforce the Federal Elections Campaign Act. The FEC has never charged Trump with violating the act.

Trump was convicted of falsifying business records. He paid his attorney a retainer which included hush money payments. The payments to the attorney were categorized at legal expense. Under NY law, falsifying business records is a crime if it’s for the purpose of committing or concealing a crime. In his instructions to the jury, the judge did not specify a particular crime. He suggested three possibilities but said they need not be unanimous on any of them.

 

[dmallord]

The FEC, not states, enforce the Federal Elections Campaign Act. The FEC has never charged Trump with violating the act.

Trump was convicted of falsifying business records. He paid his attorney a retainer which included hush money payments. The payments to the attorney were categorized at legal expense. Under NY law, falsifying business records is a crime if it’s for the purpose of committing or concealing a crime. In his instructions to the jury, the judge did not specify a particular crime. He suggested three possibilities but said they need not be unanimous on any of them.

Yep. The State of New York said he violated state laws related to campaign violations, and the state charged him with that aspect of state law violations. The jury considered the totality of those three possibilities, the charges, and the testimony, and made a unanimous decision: guilty.

It wasn't a federal trial at issue, was it? What's the problem? Is a state trial not good enough for you based upon its laws to find someone to be a felon?

You act like Trump had to be a Federal felon to be on a mugshot poster?

 

[AceDesSpades]

Laughing over here... He was charged and convicted of that in 34 felony counts.

A Free Speech for People article provides a good, easily understood summary [unless you are close-minded.]

"Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, Trump’s hush-money payments constituted campaign spending. Trump’s affairs with these women had ended years ago; Cohen contacted them in 2016 because Trump’s team worried that disclosure during the campaign season might damage him politically. That was a reasonable fear; after all, similar revelations about Bill Clinton’s infidelities had nearly derailed his 1992 presidential bid. (This was also before Trump’s “grab them by the pussy” video was released.) So paying these ex-lovers to keep silent helped his campaign—exactly the sort of expense that Trump’s campaign was legally required to disclose on campaign spending reports filed with the Federal Election Commission.

"Wait, you may say—disclosing that he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to ex-lovers to buy their silence would defeat the purpose of the payments. After all, he spent the money to keep secrets, not to reveal them. But that is the price you pay when you decide to run for President of the United States: you are legally obligated to disclose certain matters that a purely private citizen might keep secret. So Trump’s failure to report these expenses violated the Federal Election Campaign Act."

So... he was charged, buddy.

We are way past arguing petty nuances when we see the great force the MSM spent in influencing/purchiasing an election with the power of their airwaves and the political solidarity of those they chose to exercise free speed in the name of the people DNC.

This is why The Musk anger and anguish: unapproved ownership angst from the mob: the power of Democracy...

We never wanted truth to power, we just wanted power.

He's going to buy all of your in-kind contributors and close their doors and send the Education Campus scurrying back like cockroaches for "higher degrees" and another bite at the "Educator's" apple..


To us, your trophy is our country's badge of shame: third-world elections that lead to revolution(s).

 

[AceDesSpades]

The State in this case is a Democratic institution and one of the reasons we now see y'all scrambling in the light.

 

[Politruk]

We are way past arguing petty nuances when we see the great force the MSM spent in influencing/purchiasing an election with the power of their airwaves and the political solidarity of those they chose to exercise free speed in the name of the people DNC.

If the MSM were against Trump they would have ignored him. His 2016 campaign never would have gotten off the ground if they had ignored him.

 

[AceDesSpades]

Trump has always been good ratings.

You are no font of profundity.

Tell us what we know.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Mister Mallard is having a hard time accepting that the Stormy Daniels matter was nothing more than a man trying to pay off a whore to shut up about their sex because he was embarassed about it getting spread around.

Stormy Daniels is an extortionist.

The reason you pay a pro is to shut up and leave after you fuck. She cheated.

 

[AceDesSpades]

She has been canonized: Sister Monica

 

[Rebel5soul]

Mister Mallard is having a hard time accepting that the Stormy Daniels matter was nothing more than a man trying to pay off a whore to shut up about their sex because he was embarassed about it getting spread around.

Stormy Daniels is an extortionist.

The reason you pay a pro is to shut up and leave after you fuck. She cheated.

Certainly gave whoredom a bad name.

 

[Lance_Castro]

https://cbs4local-com.cdn.ampproject.org/i/s/cbs4local.com/resources/media/e2d6049b-1f0b-4666-853b-ec131f808431-large16x9_1280x960_80216P00JZQWU.png?1524092149216Certainly gave whoredom a bad name

I like the way Karen McDougal handled herself much better.

Plus, she’s pretty.

 

[Bray123]

Prosecuting a politician for using campaign funds to pay hush money to a prostitute so that the electorate doesn't find out is bad.
Prosecuting a drug addict for owning guns is good.

 

[AceDesSpades]

I like the way Karen McDougal handled herself much better.

Plus, she’s pretty.

They need to keep their mouth shut.

and swallow​

 

[Rebel5soul]

Prosecuting a politician for using campaign funds to pay hush money to a prostitute so that the electorate doesn't find out is bad.
Prosecuting a drug addict for owning guns is good.

No campaign funds were involved.

 

[AceDesSpades]

If you say it enough times then it is true: internet fact.


You read it here.

 

[Rebel5soul]

If you say it enough times then it is true: internet fact.


You read it here.

Yup, lies piled upon lies and they wonder why they have no credibility.