Never say "the left" when you mean "the Democrats"

Politruk

Loves Spam
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
18,471
No party can fairly be called "leftist" unless its political success would pose a real threat to the power of the rich and the corporations.

The Democrats do not meet that test. They give lip-service to labor, but on balance, they are almost as wholly owned by Wall Street as the Republicans.
 
...you're a Deplorable. Have fun owning that for the rest of your life - especially after this year.

Response: *crickets*

(They know. They're scared. They should be.) ;)
 
Response: *crickets*

(They know. They're scared. They should be.) ;)
Ah, the deplorable pejorative😂. How’d that work out for St. Rodham. I much prefer MAGA…Dark MAGA…

I proudly own it. Unlike your dolts who run from what you are and stand for. It’s why you went from Lib to progressive, to woke, to now just plain stupid.
 
Communist and Democrat are interchangeable these days.
you, Icanhelp, HumpdayHoratio and Hisarpy are interchangable these days.

Gee, I WONDER WHY THAT IS?!? (because they are all, um, YOU!??)

And this is a typically ignorant, thoughtless, illiterate and uneducated statement only you would come up with. You have utterly no knowledge of what Communism even is, or what the Democratic Party platform even is (hint: None of it has anything to do with what Marx, Lenin or Mao actually espoused) so you create these incendiary, drive-by posts filled with typical hisarpian idiocy and hate. Fuck off mister fifty-user name sock puppeteer.
 
No party can fairly be called "leftist" unless its political success would pose a real threat to the power of the rich and the corporations.

The Democrats do not meet that test. They give lip-service to labor, but on balance, they are almost as wholly owned by Wall Street as the Republicans.
Two sides of the same coin?

Those with money betting both sides?

Your premise/test is so horribly flawed as to fall before the opening of the gate.

No Party of Government can ever be a threat to government and governments are not formed by the destitute.

Now, a party can very fairly be labeled as Leftist when it meets the test of its adherents, who are unabashedly Leftists. It is a rather nuanced system that we employ in choosing our national leaders. You get the two choices and if you're a Leftist, to have any say, it's Democratic.

Unfortunately, for your argument, we see clearly that same inference being freely (and enthusiastically) drawn when the label "Republican" is used.

It is either false or true, but I don't see it as situationally so.

Maybe you can make it so...
 
Now, a party can very fairly be labeled as Leftist when it meets the test of its adherents, who are unabashedly Leftists.
Such leftists as there are vote D, but they don't control the party -- not even a half-assed non-socialist like Sanders ever had a chance at the nomination.
 
Kamala just happened?

That old voodoo that you do...

You know, I have to say it, That ol' black magic?

Out of the blue and into the black?
Hey, hey, my, my...,
 
Uh...,

Okay.

Whatever you think.
I'm not here to change minds.
Hell, most of the time, I can't fathom them.
Mark twain!
 
Back
Top