Indicted again

[Lazaran]

Yeah, as if Jack Smith is going to back down to a narcissistic punk.

Jack Smith???

It sounds to me like DonOld wants “Mama-la” to protect him by interfering with the DOJ, no???

 

[coati]

Jack Smith???

It sounds to me like DonOld wants “Mama-la” to protect him by interfering with the DOJ, no???

Yes, Trump has great difficulty grasping the concept of separation of powers.

It's in the hands of the DOJ, and they understand the importance of not backing down to a blow-hard.

 

[Aglaopheme]

DonOld is not taking it well.

View attachment 2383264

Is anyone surprised that DonOld has even read the indictment?

 

[UWERETHINKINGIT]

More bullshit and more Democrat Lawfare. After President Trump is reelected, time to start the treason trials...

What’s ACTUALLY being subverted here is the Supreme Court’s ruling granting presidential immunity

As usual, you’re missing the mark here. What the real travesty is here is that the immunity doesn’t go far enough and extend to every Patriot who commits crimes against the constitution and state and local laws when they fight like hell to make ‘Merica great again! Laws are for suckers and Demz!

 

[Lazaran]

Is anyone surprised that DonOld has even read the indictment?

Considering DonOld is claiming that Jack Smith rewrote the exact same case, after Jack Smith made some pretty significant changes, I would submit / conclude that DonOld hasn’t read a word of it.



I would have to be sitting in the same room with DonOld, listening to that idiot read the new indictment out loud, and following along on my own copy, before I would be satisfied that DonOld actually read it.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Considering DonOld is claiming that Jack Smith rewrote the exact same case, after Jack Smith made some pretty significant changes, I would submit / conclude that DonOld hasn’t read a word of it.



I would have to be sitting in the same room with DonOld, listening to that idiot read the new indictment out loud, and following along on my own copy, before I would be satisfied that DonOld actually read it.

Come on, we know his history, he reads everything he can get his hands on. There is no known history of him not reading important papers. Just like there is no known use of his mishandling of important papers.

 

[Bray123]

https://imgur.com/z61U6p5

 

[Bray123]

Considering DonOld is claiming that Jack Smith rewrote the exact same case, after Jack Smith made some pretty significant changes, I would submit / conclude that DonOld hasn’t read a word of it.



I would have to be sitting in the same room with DonOld, listening to that idiot read the new indictment out loud, and following along on my own copy, before I would be satisfied that DonOld actually read it.

His working methods have been well recorded previously, there's no dispute.

Someone delivers a report, he stares at it for a minute then tosses it across the room. An aide picks it up, wipes the ketchup off the cover and takes it away. Later, the aide returns with a single sheet of paper with a picture of Trump smiling. Underneath is a quote from GatewayPundit saying that he's the best person in history.

Now he's in a good mood, he can read the text (in font 25) underneath. No more than three lines, with the most important words highlighted.

Underneath, 'Sir, Sir, Sir, Sir, it's all fake news and Fox isn't carrying it so none of your supporters are aware yet. Here's how you can make money from this. Sell a battery-powered fish that speaks your beautiful words.'

https://www.trumpytrout.com

 

[Aglaopheme]

I found this interesting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1828790846155813230

 

[butters]

I found this interesting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1828790846155813230

i hope so!

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1831077618415964420

President Trump?

 

[coati]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1831077618415964420

President Trump?

The pompous asshole still does not realize he lost the last election. And his signature looks like the EKG of a guy with a serious heart condition.

 

[dmallord]

If Trump loses in November, he will likely be convicted and face hard time in federal prison for these four charges. If that happens, he will try to flee.

If he wins, he will figure out a way to stop all legal proceedings against him.

Three 'ifs' don't make a wish come true.

 

[Lazaran]

I found this interesting.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1828790846155813230

And if Trump wins re-election???

 

[dmallord]

This weaponization of the justice system could backfire. The optics look like more election tampering by the democrats.

You should discuss optics with Chloe.

She has a great deal of 'insight' on that topic. Her knowledge of military 'optic guided systems' is first-rate, though her 'political optics' are slanted and notably biased.

 

[dmallord]

Considering DonOld is claiming that Jack Smith rewrote the exact same case, after Jack Smith made some pretty significant changes, I would submit / conclude that DonOld hasn’t read a word of it.



I would have to be sitting in the same room with DonOld, listening to that idiot read the new indictment out loud, and following along on my own copy, before I would be satisfied that DonOld actually read it.

Donald reads at or below a sixth-grade level.

So no, he didn't read a word of it.

Someone verbally summarized it and typed his response. Note the lack of errors, the normal syntax, and the use of complete and complex sentence structures. Not Trump's post. [Well, it is his account, but not his effort. Just a ghostwriter today.]

 

[coati]

Three 'ifs' don't make a wish come true.

What? You never took a basic computer programming class?

Those three if-then statements are not wishes. They are an analysis of what is likely to happen under two possible scenarios (he either wins the election or loses), based on his past history of ducking accountability and abuse of power, and based on likely sentences issued by the court for a 34-count conviction.

Look, he will either become President or he won't. It's not complicated, and I am aware that either possibility could occur.

 

[dmallord]

What? You never took a basic computer programming class?

Those three if-then statements are not wishes. They are an analysis of what is likely to happen under two possible scenarios (he either wins the election or loses), based on his past history of ducking accountability and abuse of power, and based on likely sentences issued by the court for a 34-count conviction.

Look, he will either become President or he won't. It's not complicated, and I am aware that either possibility could occur.

No, no coding background, but I have a 'Chatty friend' help with this one! Hopefully it prints line 130! I have no idea if this is coded 'correctly.'

10 REM Define variables
20 PresidentWins = 0 REM Assume he does not win initially
30 AccountabilityDucked = 1 REM Assume he ducks accountability
40 AbuseOfPower = 1 REM Assume he abuses power
50 ConvictionCount = 34 REM Number of convictions
60 REM First condition: Check if he wins the election
70 IF PresidentWins = 1 THEN
80 PRINT "He becomes President."
90 IF AccountabilityDucked = 1 THEN PRINT "Likely to continue ducking accountability."
100 IF AbuseOfPower = 1 THEN PRINT "Likely to continue abusing power."
110 IF ConvictionCount > 0 THEN PRINT "Possible lenient sentence or unresolved issues."
120 ELSE
130 PRINT "He does not become President."
140 IF ConvictionCount >= 34 THEN PRINT "Court issues likely sentence."
150 END IF

 

[butters]

Jack Smith Signals Next Move in Donald Trump Immunity Case

Special Counsel Jack Smith noted that the government's upcoming filing in the federal election subversion case against former President Donald Trump will not exceed 180 pages, according to court documents filed Saturday.

The opening brief on presidential immunity, required to be filed to Judge Tanya Chutkan by September 26, is expected to be half composed of a "detailed factual proffer," with "extensive footnote citations to an exhibit appendix" spanning about 30 pages.

Given the "substantial amount of sensitive material" to be filed, the government proposed a redacted version to later be filed on the public docket.

 

[butters]

The judge in Donald Trump's alleged election fraud case is likely to allow prosecutors to make their evidence public next month.

On Friday, Washington, D.C judge Tanya Chutkan set a detailed schedule for the release, including allowing Trump to submit any objections.

She was responding to a submission by prosecutor Jack Smith, who wrote that October's release would include "quotations or summaries of information" from sensitive sources such as 'grand jury transcripts, interview reports, or material obtained through sealed search warrants,' while redacting some information, such as the names of witnesses who could be 'intimidated and threatened" by Trump supporters.

Judge Chutkan's decision came after Smith submitted a sealed 180-page brief on Thursday outlining the government's evidence against Donald Trump. On Friday, he filed a motion to publicly release the evidence.

The 180-page filing will set out what evidence prosecutors have against Trump and also includes an appendix with more information.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=8f331fc36a8543a3b14252316ce3b9e9&ei=129

 

[butters]

delay delay delay, deny deny deny, delay deny delay... <--team trump lawyers' mantra

In a court filing on Tuesday, Smith told Judge Tanya Chutkan that the former president is trying to delay the case as much as possible and is seeking documents he has already had for more than a year.

In his reply, Smith expressed his frustration that Trump is looking for documents that he already has, including his own presidential diaries.

"He asks for multiple categories of information that he has had for more than a year, including reports and transcripts for two interviews of a particular witness; text messages for specific individuals and Presidential Daily Diaries (PDDs)—all of which he received in the Government's first discovery production on August 11, 2023, as is evident from the Government's detailed Source Logs," Smith wrote.

He added that the Trump team's request for the diaries is particularly futile, as they are the former president's own documents.

"The defendant's request for PDDs is particularly notable because they are the defendant's own records, to which he has access even outside the criminal discovery process and which the Government received only after the defendant's designated representatives reviewed them in October 2022," Smith wrote.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=576f0acb6be64b66a220d39e51235119&ei=21

 

[butters]

Judge approves releasing source documents with more Trump-Jan. 6 evidence

A federal judge on Thursday approved the public release of redacted source documents that helped inform special counsel Jack Smith’s explosive 165-page legal brief arguing that Donald Trump can still face prosecution for trying to subvert the results of the 2020 election, but gave the former president seven days to take steps to block the disclosure.

Trump lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche had earlier asked the judge to keep the appendix hidden from public view, writing in a short filing, “There should be no further disclosures at this time of the so-called ‘evidence’ that the special counsel’s Office has unlawfully cherry-picked and mischaracterized — during early voting in the 2024 Presidential election — in connection with an improper Presidential immunity filing that has no basis in criminal procedure or judicial precedent.”

lololol

 

[Comshaw]

The prosecution of a criminal by the justice system could backfire if Donald gets elected. The optics would look like more tampering of our justice system by him.

Fixed it for you to be true.


Comshaw

 

[deckardB26354]

Trump lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche had earlier asked the judge to keep the appendix hidden from public view, writing in a short filing,“There should be no further disclosures at this time of the so-called ‘evidence’ that the special counsel’s Office has unlawfully cherry-picked and mischaracterized — during early voting in the 2024 Presidential election — in connection with an improper Presidential immunity filing that has no basis in criminal procedure or judicial precedent.”

Here’s a nice FUCK YOU to Orange Fuhrer’s “lawyers” because your idiot client is the one that has had the entire legal system bend over forwards for his fucking orange ass. He should have been in a sentencing hearing by now and probably in PRISON! Eat my ass, you sheisters!