Trump Shreds Kamala In Rigged 3 v 1 Debate

On second viewing, I agree that at least David Muir was also attacking Trump. Linsey Davis did less there. That would explain why he always looked forward, at the one threat in the room. Trump could have expected biased moderators after 8 years of attacks from all sides, but he was still rattled that night.
Constantly referencing Matt Taibbi is not the intellectual flex that you think it is.
 
This is not a site I would choose for intellectual flexing.
I respectfully disagree. I actually think that it is quite challenging to pen an engaging erotic tale. I don’t know but I want to believe that the forum and PB are offshoots of folks either writing or reading stories. If we’re talking a newly created member immediately posting here then I would agree.
 

Biden Donned Trump Hat in Shanksville as Show of 9/11 Unity, White House Says​

Story by Jesus Mesa
• 17h

President Joe Biden briefly donned a red "Trump 2024" hat during a visit to a Shanksville, Pennsylvania fire station, in what the White House described as a gesture of unity on the anniversary of the September 11 attacks.

"At the Shanksville Fire Station, @POTUS spoke about the country's bipartisan unity after 9/11 and said we needed to get back to that," White House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates posted on social media.


https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1qpHJh.img?w=768&h=512&m=6&x=1243&y=434&s=359&d=359

Bates said Biden gave a hat to a Trump supporter in the crowd as a friendly gesture. The supporter then asked Biden to put on a Trump cap in the name of bipartisanship, and the president went along, briefly wearing the red hat.

"As a gesture, he gave a hat to a Trump supporter, who then suggested that, in the same spirit, POTUS should wear the Trump cap. He briefly put it on," Bates added.

More here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/othe...ow-of-9-11-unity-white-house-says/ar-AA1qpF3V

Trump said Joe was pissed at Kamala for running him out of office. He did this right after the debate. Democrats everywhere are howling at the imagery. Originally I thought it was AI but it actually happened.
 
I respectfully disagree. I actually think that it is quite challenging to pen an engaging erotic tale. I don’t know but I want to believe that the forum and PB are offshoots of folks either writing or reading stories. If we’re talking a newly created member immediately posting here then I would agree.
That's fine for them. My interest in the PB is more idle chat with other people holding umbrellas as I try to hold my umbrella adequately over my head in a shitstorm.
 
He also said Haitians are eating pets in Springfield, Jack.
The angry Biden scenario is far more plausible...wouldn't you be angry if someone forced your hand and humiliated you in that fashion? I would be, no doubt. It's a very natural human emotion. I'm not one for validating emotions, I think that's been overdone, but I could see the validity of that kind of rage.
 
Why did the embarrassing stunt Musk attempted last year with the Twitter Files not discredit Taibbi’s journalistic integrity in your view?
I barely notice Twitter. My browser blocks tweets. Unblocking them is mostly not worth the clicks.
 
I barely notice Twitter. My browser blocks tweets. Unblocking them is mostly not worth the clicks.
Huh? You recognizing if Twitter exists or not has nothing to do with the question. The story wasn’t about interactive tweets between members.
 
They're one of the few unbiased news sites that actually reports news these days.
The media bias chart strongly disagrees with you. "Strong Right" and "Opinion or wide variation in reliability"

It won't change your mind, but there, I said it anyway.
 
The media bias chart strongly disagrees with you. "Strong Right" and "Opinion or wide variation in reliability"

It won't change your mind, but there, I said it anyway.
Who owns or operates this chart? I have to wonder....
 
Who owns or operates this chart? I have to wonder....
Jesus, take off your tinfoil hat. They are respected for their work and are fully transparent in their operations and development of the chart. It also passes the smell test just by looking at it, if anyone ever bothered.
 
Jesus, take off your tinfoil hat. They are respected for their work and are fully transparent in their operations and development of the chart. It also passes the smell test just by looking at it, if anyone ever bothered.
Frankly, I don't trust anyone right now. People are going to have to earn my trust. I don't know these guys. That's a long road to hoe these days.
 
They rated Newsweek as "center." That doesn't help their credibility with me.
The question was who owns and operates it.

If you're concerned about credibility, perhaps take a look at their methodology for criticism, which is also mentioned on the page.
 
The question was who owns and operates it.

If you're concerned about credibility, perhaps take a look at their methodology for criticism, which is also mentioned on the page.
I know what the question was. I asked it. I asked that question with a view toward determining their reliability. If they are owned and operated by lackeys of the elite, that doesn't help them with me.
 
Back
Top