Disrespect for the Dead in Arlington National Cemetery

[Rotadom]

VoteVets says...

 

[dmallord]

dunno if that's a typo or an auto-correct but it amuses me anyway with its probability factor

Damned spell checker!

Yeah, it sounds humous now that I've reread it, too. I tried to type a narcissistic person, but it was swapped for a narcotic person. My bad for not proofreading well enough. There are those rumors he was an alleged user.

 

[dmallord]

Nope. That was just an accurate statement of open bias. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the selection of our judges, we have an overly politicized judicial system.

Three of trump's SC picks certainly prove that!

 

[dmallord]

Yup.

Where was the trial held? Where was the jury from? Absolutely they were part of the lynch mob.

Nope.

New York's Manhattan District - Most cases are handled where the crimes are committed. But you know that?

The jury came from the Manhattan Borough. Again, juries are picked from the area where the crimes are committed. But you know that.

The lynching mob was after Trump? No, that was Mike Pence they hunted. He wasn't in New York. Isn't supporting Trump any longer and isn't voting for him either. Mike Pence had an epiphany.

I'm waiting for yours.

 

[SmokingFap]

 

[dkovic77]

I believe the families of the fallen had a lot to do with Trump and the ceremony, I believe behind the scenes the families invited Trump.

believe… seems you always confuse that with facts and reality.

Getting the potatoes prepped for the busy weekend?? Last chance beach weekend, folks want fries!

 

[Bn2f]

believe… seems you always confuse that with facts and reality.

Getting the potatoes prepped for the busy weekend?? Last chance beach weekend, folks want fries!

Brian Tyree Henry? Cool! Did not know he was in the original cast of BoM!

 

[icanhelp1]

Nope.

New York's Manhattan District - Most cases are handled where the crimes are committed. But you know that?

The jury came from the Manhattan Borough. Again, juries are picked from the area where the crimes are committed. But you know that.

The lynching mob was after Trump? No, that was Mike Pence they hunted. He wasn't in New York. Isn't supporting Trump any longer and isn't voting for him either. Mike Pence had an epiphany.

I'm waiting for yours.

There should have been a venue change to assure a fair trial.

 

[Bn2f]

There should have been a venue change to assure a fair trial.

STFU.
If you hate the jurors from NYC and what they represent then you should damn well hate the candidate who has hailed from NYC as well.

 

[icanhelp1]

STFU.
If you hate the jurors from NYC and what they represent then you should damn well hate the candidate who has hailed from NYC as well.

Once again you succeeded in making yourself look stupid.

 

[Aglaopheme]

A jury of his peers were denied an explanation of campaign finance law, testimony that would have favored Trump’s defense, obvious due process violation.

They had the details. Trump broke the law. Are you trying to say he didn’t violate any FEC laws?

 

[dkovic77]

Once again you succeeded in making yourself look stupid.

That is so hilarious. From someone who knows what making one look stupid… you are the king.

Time to make the hashbrowns traitor tater!

 

[Bn2f]

Once again you succeeded in making yourself look stupid.

Explain how I've done that because I would like to be a stupid person only maybe once or twice in my life.

You're here bemoaning the citizens of NYC as somehow, IDK , being corrupt? Not be afforded the right to judge their peers? Meanwhile, the person you are defending from their judgment throughout his life extolled and claimed to be the physical embodiment of all the sins, ills, and flaws the rest of the nation viewed the monied elites of NYC (Manhattan) were.

 

[HisArpy]

They had the details. Trump broke the law. Are you trying to say he didn’t violate any FEC laws?

The case isn't final. Until it is, then neither your nor I actually know.

 

[icanhelp1]

They had the details. Trump broke the law. Are you trying to say he didn’t violate any FEC laws?

No they didn't. The NY law that Trump was originally charged with was a book keeping misdemeanor charge that outran the statute of limitations. It was a sham trial.

Trump did not violate FEC regulations. Brad Smith was not allowed to testify before the Jury explaining in detail campaign finance law and how it affected Trumps defense.

Judge Merchan sharply limited what Trump's expert witness could testify about. Judges most often allow expert witness testimony to always give the Defense every opportunity to defend their client and to not appear prejudicial.

Merchan ruled that allowing Smith to testify expansively on the topic would supplant the Judge's role to determine what the law is. Expansive detailed testimony is what expert witnesses do. Merchan in this case had his thumb on the scale and denied the Trump team due process.

Sham trial, Merchan might as well have been sitting on the side of the prosecution rather than on the bench.

 

[icanhelp1]

Explain how I've done that because I would like to be a stupid person only maybe once or twice in my life.

You're here bemoaning the citizens of NYC as somehow, IDK , being corrupt? Not be afforded the right to judge their peers? Meanwhile, the person you are defending from their judgment throughout his life extolled and claimed to be the physical embodiment of all the sins, ills, and flaws the rest of the nation viewed the monied elites of NYC (Manhattan) were.

You said all that shit not me.

 

[Bray123]

There should have been a venue change to assure a fair trial.

Waycross, Georgia would be your choice for any Trump trial.

 

[icanhelp1]

Waycross, Georgia would be your choice for any Trump trial.

Certainly not a district that voted 90 to 95% democrat. imho

 

[Bray123]

Certainly not a district that voted 90 to 95% democrat. imho

Maybe felons should think twice before committing more crimes in areas where everyone knows them.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

There should have been a venue change to assure a fair trial.

Trump did ask for a venue change,it was denied by the appellate court,not Merchan. Also, please don't forget Trump also failed to request Trial by Jury. But hey, to you it's all the Judges fault.

 

[Aglaopheme]

No they didn't. The NY law that Trump was originally charged with was a book keeping misdemeanor charge that outran the statute of limitations. It was a sham trial.

Trump did not violate FEC regulations. Brad Smith was not allowed to testify before the Jury explaining in detail campaign finance law and how it affected Trumps defense.

Judge Merchan sharply limited what Trump's expert witness could testify about. Judges most often allow expert witness testimony to always give the Defense every opportunity to defend their client and to not appear prejudicial.

Merchan ruled that allowing Smith to testify expansively on the topic would supplant the Judge's role to determine what the law is. Expansive detailed testimony is what expert witnesses do. Merchan in this case had his thumb on the scale and denied the Trump team due process.

Sham trial, Merchan might as well have been sitting on the side of the prosecution rather than on the bench.

He violated several FEC regulations. When the complaints against Trump were filed with the FEC the statute of limitations had not run out.

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7313/7313_28.pdf

Republicans on the FEC blocked the investigation, but never said they didn’t think Trump did violate campaign finance laws.

In a statement explaining their votes against moving forward with an investigation, Cooksey and Trainor avoided addressing the merits of the allegations against Trump. Instead, they couched their votes as “an exercise of prosecutorial discretion” because they had “concluded that pursuing these matters further was not the best use of agency resources” given the FEC’s enforcement backlog at the time, the amount of time until the statute of limitations expired, and their belief that the Justice Department’s successful prosecution of Cohen over the hush money payment had “adequately enforced and vindicated the Commission’s interests.”

In their own statement, Democratic Commissioners Shana Broussard and Ellen Weintraub, who supported investigating Trump, pointedly observed that their Republican colleagues’ statement was “notably devoid of anyexplanation that specifically addresses their votes to dismiss the allegations against Trump, the Committee, and the Trump Organization.” For their part, Broussard and Weintraub stated that there was “ample evidence in the record” to justify an investigation but the Commission “did not have enough votes to pursue well-grounded charges that the former President of the United States knowingly and willfully accepted contributions nearly 5,000% over the legal limit to suppress a negative story mere days before Election Day.”

In addition to Michael Cohen’s payment to Stephanie Clifford, the statement of factssupporting District Attorney Bragg’s indictmentof Trump describes another hush money schemeinvolving American Media, Inc. (AMI), the publisher of the National Enquirer, and a $150,000 “catch and kill” payment for the rights to former Playboy model Karen McDougal’s story about her alleged affair with Trump. The FEC also received complaints about the AMI payment and, as in the Cohen case, the agency’s nonpartisan attorneys recommended finding reason to believe that Trump and others violated campaign finance law. But the Republican commissioners again blocked an investigation into Trump, citing prosecutorial discretionbecause, among other things, the FEC’s attorneys conducted “extensive outside research into news reports, published books, and social media posts” that the Republicans claimed to be unreliable. Their own effort to dismiss the allegations against Trump also failed to gain the four necessary votes to succeed.

 

[Bn2f]

You said all that shit not me.

This? This is your reply? Do Not Call Me or Anyone Else Stupid.

 

[Bn2f]

Waycross, Georgia would be your choice for any Trump trial.

Certainly not a district that voted 90 to 95% democrat. imho

Certainly an interesting defense you are proposing here. Wanna know who else said this in their defense? EVERY F'IN BLACK PERSON EVER LYNCHED.
If I were a lawyer, conservative or not, posting on this thread - I would quickly inform you of your very unconstitutional error in stating this.
But instead, we get BS like this:

The case isn't final. Until it is, then neither your nor I actually know.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

So, as I surmised earlier, they had PERMISSION;

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/08/28/trump-npr-arlington-cemetary-n2644032


And some worker KAREN decided to try and stop them instead of checking with their boss.

But you FUCKWITS just had to vilify Trump. Because TDS runs rampant in your heads. You idjits are a waste off food, oxygen, and space.

Who did they get permission from? Do you have a cite?

 

[ll74]

Who did they get permission from? Do you have a cite?

They have a screenshot someone posted to Twitter. No one has confirmed this.