Shot fired at Trump?

[CuriousRick]

His FBI handlers were no doubt encouraging him to get his daddy to buy an AR-15 for him to use in the assassination attempt so that they could exploit it to gain support for gun control.

 

[DeluxAuto]

 

[Aglaopheme]

It wasn't just that. The cell phone pinged 40+ times in locations where Crooks was known to frequent.

Including the gun range where Crooks was a member. And the gun store he frequented. And where he worked (IIRC) and his school and several other locations he was known to go.

Which is kinda strange and not an isolated incident like you're trying to make it out to be.

Okay, but the big take away is the guy went into a building near an FBI office.

 

[HisArpy]

Okay, but the big take away is the guy went into a building near an FBI office.

And your point is? Because 40+ times from DC to Butler Pa before the shooting seems kinda coincidental.

Especially when we don't know who this guy is because the Feds refuse to say.

 

[butters]

looks like he's not prepared to take another 'bullet for democracy' with plans for mainly indoor rallies from now on or smaller rallies with buildings either further away or far more easily secured.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=3f2ce272e3104c9b86210a57c0316604&ei=127

 

[jomar]

Question:

What other news sources are reporting ANYTHING about the status of the investigation or any news/leads/new information that's being uncovered?

I'm asking because if the only news we're getting is from sources you won't trust, then why aren't your trustworthy sources telling us anything?

It can't be that there's nothing to report because we know that's not possible. And since when does the media wait to be fed scraps instead of investigating?

So, why?

Well, who says they’re not? Rightguide likes the gateway pundit because it scrapes other sources and twists the narrative that fits a worldview that he agrees with

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Question:

What other news sources are reporting ANYTHING about the status of the investigation or any news/leads/new information that's being uncovered?

I'm asking because if the only news we're getting is from sources you won't trust, then why aren't your trustworthy sources telling us anything?

It can't be that there's nothing to report because we know that's not possible. And since when does the media wait to be fed scraps instead of investigating?

So, why?

Answer: the other sites are reporting on it and you're just an idiot.

 

[HisArpy]

looks like he's not prepared to take another 'bullet for democracy' with plans for mainly indoor rallies from now on or smaller rallies with buildings either further away or far more easily secured.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=3f2ce272e3104c9b86210a57c0316604&ei=127

And I suppose you think this is cowardice on his part?

 

[dmallord]

And I suppose you think this is cowardice on his part?

I'm taking it as Trump listening to advice for once, about safety, his at the moment, lest we forget his famous confrontation at the Ellipse on J6.

You will recall his conversations over concerns that the rallygoers were not entering the ellipse to fill it like he wanted to–a large audience. When told some of the supporters were armed and wouldn't come through the magnetometers, he tried to order them removed.

Cassidy Hutchinson testified to his language at the event. “I don’t f-in’ care that they have weapons....” “They’re not here to hurt me. Take the f-in’ mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here.”

Prophetic words? “They’re not here to hurt me. Take the f-in’ mags away. Let my people in."

It became a different point of view when he felt the sting of a bullet meant to end his campaign. So, I believe it prudent for Trump to be concerned for his safety, not cowardice.

Tell me how you would feel if JD Vance now had to step into the ring as your next-level Republican offering. Just a few days and his ratings are in the toilet–lowest of any VP candidate in US history.

 

[Aglaopheme]

And I suppose you think this is cowardice on his part?

I read it was the SS that made the recommendation. I, for one, am glad he actually listened to them.

 

[HisArpy]

I read it was the SS that made the recommendation. I, for one, am glad he actually listened to them.

Why would he not? The D's are still at it with stoking anger and violence against him. They're still calling him the biggest threat to America and national security.

This is not rhetoric which is designed to cool the political climate. It is a calculated effort to incite someone else to maybe do a better job than the first whackjob.

It is, in effect, a conspiracy to overthrow the government of the US by the use of political assassination tactics.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Why would he not? The D's are still at it with stoking anger and violence against him. They're still calling him the biggest threat to America and national security.

This is not rhetoric which is designed to cool the political climate. It is a calculated effort to incite someone else to maybe do a better job than the first whackjob.

It is, in effect, a conspiracy to overthrow the government of the US by the use of political assassination tactics.

J6

 

[HisArpy]

J6

J6 was a riot that the Left has ginned up to be something is isn't and never was.

But you go ahead and keep thinking that a bunch of unarmed people who were invited inside the capitol are guilty of being violent insurrectionists by walking around peacefully inside. Meanwhile the rest of us normal and sane citizens will watch in horror, shock, and anger as you and your friends riot, burn, loot, and murder because you decided that all the white people in society are evil and can be killed and tortured with impunity.

Tell us again who the violent ones are because we SEE you and WE don't believe you're righteous or telling the truth.

 

[butters]

it must be such a party living in Barbie's world (referencing harpy's world of make-believe)

 

[Lazaran]

J6 was a riot that the Left has ginned up to be something is isn't and never was.

But you go ahead and keep thinking that a bunch of unarmed people who were invited inside the capitol are guilty of being violent insurrectionists by walking around peacefully inside. Meanwhile the rest of us normal and sane citizens will watch in horror, shock, and anger as you and your friends riot, burn, loot, and murder because you decided that all the white people in society are evil and can be killed and tortured with impunity.

Tell us again who the violent ones are because we SEE you and WE don't believe you're righteous or telling the truth.

This ^ is another example of why Derpy isn’t taken seriously.

Not that we needed another example from “Carbon-water-electrocution-by-battery-boy”.



Derpy

 

[stxjimmy]

This ^ is another example of why Derpy isn’t taken seriously.

Not that we needed another example from “Carbon-water-electrocution-by-battery-boy”.



Derpy

It is a parallel universe with them

 

[butters]

looks like the two SWAT-trained service members of Butler Emergency Service Unit that were stationed inside the building the shooter climbed up on left their posts in order to help search for the 'suspicious' person. They were also the first to report he was suspicious after he failed to enter with the rest of the crowds and was seen to be carrying something in his hand (the range finder).

Paris said that the two officers left their post to go search for Crooks on the ground “alongside other local officers in the immediacy after Crooks had been identified as a suspicious person.”

“Are you then saying from your knowledge that those ESU officers left the location where they could look out the window in search of this person?” Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.) asked Paris.

“Yes, that is my understanding,” Paris responded.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=2a8b67a709ab44939330263d86b182ce&ei=127

video at the hearing suggests these two officers would have had a clear shot at the shooter from their position.

There's nothing in this article that speaks to who decided those officers should depart their position, and whether it was inclusive of input from the SS.

Seems the Butler team lacked adequate resources in this instance but should it ever have been a local police force's job in the first place to secure this building so close (for a sniper) to the stage?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1816243761988657217

 

[Lazaran]

looks like the two SWAT-trained service members of Butler Emergency Service Unit that were stationed inside the building the shooter climbed up on left their posts in order to help search for the 'suspicious' person. They were also the first to report he was suspicious after he failed to enter with the rest of the crowds and was seen to be carrying something in his hand (the range finder).


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=2a8b67a709ab44939330263d86b182ce&ei=127

video at the hearing suggests these two officers would have had a clear shot at the shooter from their position.

There's nothing in this article that speaks to who decided those officers should depart their position, and whether it was inclusive of input from the SS.

Seems the Butler team lacked adequate resources in this instance but should it ever have been a local police force's job in the first place to secure this building so close (for a sniper) to the stage?

The local police dropped the ball completely, imho:

They found Crooks in possession of the range finder at a screening checkpoint and didn’t detain him.

They saw him acting suspiciously and didn’t confront him.

They left their posts and provided Crooks the opportunity to fire from that position on the roof.

They didn’t convey the seriousness of the threat to the Secret Service in real time. (They just said there was a suspicious person in that area outside the Secret Service “hard perimeter”. (And, no, the Secret Service doesn’t have the personnel to cover a yuuuuuge outdoor venue - and budget slashing small government types bear responsibility for some of the Secret Service’s personnel issues.)



But hey, the FEMALE head of the Secret Service (who wasn’t even at the rally) was held responsible for EVERYTHING, while the MALE law enforcement personnel ON-SITE at the Trump rally are currently getting a free pass. (And notice how the RWCJ usual suspects are laying EVERYTHING at the feet of the FEMALES involved - focusing on the FEMALE agents who were shielding Trump just fine until that idiot forced himself upright for a photo-op and the FEMALE head of the Secret Service???)



Hell, even the MALE snipers who FAILED to take the shot for "reasons" before Crooks opened fire have pretty much been given a free pass.



And of course Trump gets a free pass from the RWCJ for EVERYTHING - from the political climate, the gun-culture; the location and chaos of his rallies; the kind of people that he attracts; the comments at the J6 rally telling the Secret Service: “I don’t fucking care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here, let the people in and take the mags away.”, etc.



But it’s ALL the FEMALES’ fault.



JFC

SAD!!!

Edit: (Credit to stxjimmy)

Trump also has a history of stiffing local communities for costs of his rallies, which may help explain local law enforcement skimping on providing adequate personnel.



JFC

SAD!!!

 

[stxjimmy]

The local police dropped the ball completely, imho:

They found Crooks in possession of the range finder at a screening checkpoint and didn’t detain him.

They saw him acting suspiciously and didn’t confront him.

They left their posts and provided Crooks the opportunity to fire from that position on the roof.

They didn’t convey the seriousness of the threat to the Secret Service in real time. (They just said there was a suspicious person in that area outside the Secret Service “hard perimeter”. (And, no, the Secret Service doesn’t have the personnel to cover a yuuuuuge outdoor venue - and budget slashing small government types bear responsibility for some of the Secret Service’s personnel issues.)



But hey, the FEMALE head of the Secret Service (who wasn’t even at the rally) was held responsible for EVERYTHING, while the MALE law enforcement personnel ON-SITE at the Trump rally are currently getting a free pass. (And notice how the RWCJ usual suspects are laying EVERYTHING at the feet of the FEMALES involved -focusing on the FEMALE agents who were shielding Trump just fine until that idiot forced himself upright for a photo-op and the FEMALE head of the Secret Service???)



Hell, even the MALE snipers who FAILED to take the shot for "reasons" before Crooks opened fire have pretty much been given a free pass.



And of course Trump gets a free pass from the RWCJ for EVERYTHING - from the political climate, the gun-culture; the location and chaos of his rallies; the kind of people that he attracts; the comments at the J6 rally telling the Secret Service: “I don’t fucking care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here, let the people in and take the mags away.”, etc.



But it’s ALL the FEMALES’ fault.



JFC

SAD!!!

And don’t forget how many cities he’s ripped off not paying for venues and security

 

[Lazaran]

And don’t forget how many cities he’s ripped off not paying for venues and security

Dammit!!!

I keep forgetting to include that little tidbit!!! (Fixed)

 

[Saint_Ann]

Not sure I would stand behind Trump at a rally.

 

[schism666]

Not sure I would stand behind Trump at a rally.

liar. that's you in the wife beater.

 

[Saint_Ann]

liar. that's you in the wife beater.

View attachment 2369375

Ahh. Little rory troll fat shaming.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1816256744244318395