dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 4,997
Duh, that's been answered dozens of times in the threads. You can't accept the true of the matter. Keep lying.We've asked them dozens of times and none of them can come up with an answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Duh, that's been answered dozens of times in the threads. You can't accept the true of the matter. Keep lying.We've asked them dozens of times and none of them can come up with an answer.
The schmucks think if they can keep the circular rhetoric volleyball in the air, it negates the reality of the trial's outcome.Duh, that's been answered dozens of times in the threads. You can't accept the true of the matter. Keep lying.
Congratulate him for finding one thing that is credible about Trump? You jest. You can imagine how pumped up his chest is at reading your acknowledgment.![]()
You’re the one going round and round. I showed you the wording of the felony in the indictment.
Your stupid little game is just that.
The felony charge in the indictment:
“§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.”
Maybe you'll personally experience that one day.
Doubt it, but sometimes miracles happen.
Sorry, Harpy, but this is way too far above your head for you to understand. Just stick to chasing ambulances and forget about trying to convince us that you know better than the New York judicial system.You've posted the language of the law. In order to get to those false business records being a class E felony there has to be ANOTHER crime besides the false entries. WHAT OTHER CRIME are you claiming Trump committed which elevates the misdemeanors to felonies?
Simple. What other crime?
Sorry, Harpy, but this is way too far above your head for you to understand. Just stick to chasing ambulances and forget about trying to convince us that you know better than the New York judicial system.
I hate to dash your fantasies, but no one is going to say, "Hey, we were wrong all along. Dammit, we should have listened to that legal scholar on the porn board."
I experience it every day and twice on Sundays.
Unlike some who have never had the pleasure.
You've posted the language of the law. In order to get to those false business records being a class E felony there has to be ANOTHER crime besides the false entries. WHAT OTHER CRIME are you claiming Trump committed which elevates the misdemeanors to felonies?
Simple. What other crime?
Lol, yet another shit for brains who can't tell us what other crime.
You didn't do what he asked you to do.I already quoted the law for you.
It’s not my fault that you’re too stupid to be a lawyer.
I will tell you that Bragg has no authority to prosecute a federal crime, such in the first place.Dumb fuck,
What were the crimes Michael Cohen went to prison for? Part of it was conspiracy with “Individual 1” for which he pled guilty in 2018, well within the two year statute of imitations for a misdemeanor. In the recent hush money trial Cohen testified and evidence showed that Trump was a co-conspirator.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Cohen_(lawyer)
(There are sources available besides Wiki if you want to do your homework.)
In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts including campaign-finance violations, tax fraud, and bank fraud. Cohen said he violated campaign-finance laws at Trump's direction "for the principal purpose of influencing" the 2016 Presidential Election.
What was the secondary crime that elevated the business docs falsification to a felony? Read it again, you fucking dumb ass:
§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more
persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to
a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by
one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Are you going to argue that the Federal charges agains Cohen can’t be used to elevate the charges in NY state?Read 17-152 again.
I will tell you that Bragg has no authority to prosecute a federal crime, such in the first place.
Bragg prosecuted Trump for the state crime of falsifying business records to hide a federal crime.I will tell you that Bragg has no authority to prosecute a federal crime, such in the first place.
Bragg prosecuted Trump for the state crime of falsifying business records to hide a federal crime.
You didn't do what he asked you to do.
There was no federal crime according to the Federal Election Commission and the DOJ.Bragg prosecuted Trump for the state crime of falsifying business records to hide a federal crime.
Not true he already knew the answer. He wanted to see if you did.He wanted me to do his homework. Trump has already been found guilty. I’m not the one trying to justify an appeal.
True. And Judge Merchan would not even allow the jury to hear expert testimony on federal election law as applied to the facts of the case.There was no federal crime according to the Federal Election Commission and the DOJ.
Damn such great self incite. I'm impressedTranslation: It's impossible to debate someone who has superior knowledge I can't refute, so all I have left are my angry delusions.
You've posted the language of the law. In order to get to those false business records being a class E felony there has to be ANOTHER crime besides the false entries. WHAT OTHER CRIME are you claiming Trump committed which elevates the misdemeanors to felonies?
Simple. What other crime?
Why don't you go touch the battery posts and do us all a favour....There are more than enough amps in a 12 volt car battery to do the job.
True. And Judge Merchan would not even allow the jury to hear expert testimony on federal election law as applied to the facts of the case.