LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

jomar said:
I agree, Judge Cannon is very biased.


lol, preach on Mr. I’m not a MAGAt and am a law and order guy in a totally non-partisan way because I’m a liberal in the non-democratic meaning of liberal and don’t carry water for trump our savior amen. 😊
Click to expand...
BREATH!!!!! you're going to pass out! MEDIC!!! MEDIC!!!!
 
icanhelp1 said:
Why wasn't it passable?
Click to expand...

Overtly partisan. Not enough votes because of the extreme one-sidedness of the bill.

And you know that.

Just like you know that Trump purposefully sank the Senate bill to score political points against Biden. You also know the Border Patrol endorsed the Senate bill but not HR2.

The stupid thing is you actually believe Trump decreased illegal immigration.

You're an idiot and an anti-American POS.

You believe it is patriotic to hate what ends up amounting to more than half of your fellow citizens.
 
adrina said:
Overtly partisan. Not enough votes because of the extreme one-sidedness of the bill.

And you know that.

Just like you know that Trump purposefully sank the Senate bill to score political points against Biden. You also know the Border Patrol endorsed the Senate bill but not HR2.

The stupid thing is you actually believe Trump decreased illegal immigration.

You're an idiot and an anti-American POS.

You believe it is patriotic to hate what ends up amounting to more than half of your fellow citizens.
Click to expand...
Why was the bill one sided? Dems are like lemmings, they don't reason things out. If the minority leader walks off a cliff you can be assured 212 will blindly follow.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Why was the bill one sided? Dems are like lemmings, they don't reason things out. If the minority leader walks off a cliff you can be assured 212 will blindly follow.
Click to expand...

It's like you're not even familiar with the bill.

Massive and expensive surveillance without any plan to implement, oversee or maintain it.

No backup plan to deal with the agricultural industry labor and product to market issues which would arise from the bill.

Barriers to asylum instead of processing orderly - approaching it as if it must be stopped instead of managed.

Detention for years without a real endgame.

It's like you think that these things won't hurt America. You hate immigrants to the point where you don't care about cutting off America's nose to spite your face.

Again, Donald Trump never decreased illegal immigration. HR2 was a farce of a bill, poorly written and without real methods to handling immigration.

It was written how you idiots deal with abortion: with the goal of stopping it no matter what.
 
adrina said:
It's like you're not even familiar with the bill.

Massive and expensive surveillance without any plan to implement, oversee or maintain it.

No backup plan to deal with the agricultural industry labor and product to market issues which would arise from the bill.

Barriers to asylum instead of processing orderly - approaching it as if it must be stopped instead of managed.

Detention for years without a real endgame.

It's like you think that these things won't hurt America. You hate immigrants to the point where you don't care about cutting off America's nose to spite your face.

Again, Donald Trump never decreased illegal immigration. HR2 was a farce of a bill, poorly written and without real methods to handling immigration.

It was written how you idiots deal with abortion: with the goal of stopping it no matter what.
Click to expand...

“Nuh-uh” is the only possible response ineedhelp1 can give to that perfectly accurate rebuttal.

Cue ineedhelp1 saying “Nuh-uh” in 3…2…1…

😑
 
Lazaran said:
“Nuh-uh” is the only possible response ineedhelp1 can give to that perfectly accurate rebuttal.

Cue ineedhelp1 saying “Nuh-uh” in 3…2…1…

😑
Click to expand...

And I didn't even mention the complete railroading of building the wall. No environmental studies, no site reviews etc.

Or family detention - ya know, the children in cages thing.

It was a poorly written bill not based in reality that would have actually hurt America in multiple and wide spread ways.

The idiot traitor can't defend it - only carry on about how it didn't pass.
 
adrina said:
And I didn't even mention the complete railroading of building the wall. No environmental studies, no site reviews etc.

Or family detention - ya know, the children in cages thing.

It was a poorly written bill not based in reality that would have actually hurt America in multiple and wide spread ways.

The idiot traitor can't defend it - only carry on about how it didn't pass.
Click to expand...

ineedhelp1 also presumed / presumes that The House could / can DICTATE to The Senate and the President what the immigration reform and border security policy would / will be via the partisan HR-2 bill.

Quite presumptuous.

Also:

Not happening.

😑
 
ll74 said:
What part of partisan bill is too complicated for you to understand?
Click to expand...
Debate the fucking thing. Refusing to take up the bill was a slap in the face to house republicans. Schumer came across as an arrogant retard with zero interest in meeting half way and creating a bill that both sides could live with. Like all bills there are good points and not so good points. Dems play the all or nothing game.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Debate the fucking thing. Refusing to take up the bill was a slap in the face to house republicans. Schumer came across as an arrogant retard with zero interest in meeting half way and creating a bill that both sides could live with. Like all bills there are good points and not so good points. Dems play the all or nothing game.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the republicans - and Trump - who killed the bill that could pass, that addressed the real issues, that didn't cripple agriculture and was endorsed by the Border Patrol.

You bitch the senate didn't take up that POS HR2 - which was as listed earlier - and you never addressed - a completely fucked up bit of "legislation". And I use the term "legislation" very loosely.

All or nothing - like Trump killing a bill that would take away one of his main talking points and give a win to the country.
 
icanhelp1 said:
# 1166 you dumb fuck!!! Pay attention!
Click to expand...


Thanks for the chuckle idiot traitor. I don't read most of what you write. It's painfully stupid.

You still haven't addressed the real issues with HR2 and how they compared with the bipartisan senate bill the Border Patrol supported and that Trump had killed.
 
adrina said:
Thanks for the chuckle idiot traitor. I don't read most of what you write. It's painfully stupid.

You still haven't addressed the real issues with HR2 and how they compared with the bipartisan senate bill the Border Patrol supported and that Trump had killed.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I noticed that ^ as well.

ineedhelp1 couldn’t even muster a “Nuh-uh”.

😑
 
icanhelp1 said:
Debate the fucking thing. Refusing to take up the bill was a slap in the face to house republicans. Schumer came across as an arrogant retard with zero interest in meeting half way and creating a bill that both sides could live with. Like all bills there are good points and not so good points. Dems play the all or nothing game.
Click to expand...
So the Senate refusing to take up the Senate bipartisan bill was what then? The Senate bill had a chance of passing. The House bill did not.

Lol...fuck off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

fgarvb1
Separation Of Powers Between President And Congress
Replies
7
Views
979
Gunner70
Gunner70
Peregrinator
Transcript of Fitzgerald's Press Conference
Replies
3
Views
399
Mr Noone
Mr Noone
Back
Top