Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

[BabyBoomer50s]

You’d have to wonder that since that’s such a big issue why haven’t Trump’s attorneys addressed that.

Maybe because the defense hasn’t presented its case yet. They start next week. Lol

 

[Comshaw]

So you don’t know what the crime is that he allegedly attempted to commit or cover up either.

Again it seems you have a comprehension problem. What part of "34 felony counts" don't you understand? I thought that perhaps you and TST had enough intelligence and maturity to read the indictment. Apparently not. That seems to be the problem with a lot of people. They listen to those who know nothing or they form an opinion on a sound bite and ignore facts in favor of what they want to believe. I've made it a policy not to argue with people like that. It's like arguing with a mule. You can do so until you're blue in the face and the mule ain't going to pay no mind.

TA

Comshaw

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Again it seems you have a comprehension problem. What part of "34 felony counts" don't you understand? I thought that perhaps you and TST had enough intelligence and maturity to read the indictment. Apparently not. That seems to be the problem with a lot of people. They listen to those who know nothing or they form an opinion on a sound bite and ignore facts in favor of what they want to believe. I've made it a policy not to argue with people like that. It's like arguing with a mule. You can do so until you're blue in the face and the mule ain't going to pay no mind.

TA

Comshaw

Why not just answer the question. What crime did Trump attempt to commit or cover up? You claim to know. Why keep dodging?

 

[TastySuckToy]

What part of "34 felony counts" don't you understand? I thought that perhaps you and TST had enough intelligence and maturity to read the indictment.

Your indictment source clearly states nothing illegal or criminal happened.

Again, thanks for the source that exonerates Trump.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Maybe because the defense hasn’t presented its case yet. They start next week. Lol

If Trump has t been charged with a crime what defense could they possibly present?
Any competent attorney would have the case thrown out of the prosecution hasn’t said what they’re charging the defendant with.

 

[HisArpy]

Again it seems you have a comprehension problem. What part of "34 felony counts" don't you understand? I thought that perhaps you and TST had enough intelligence and maturity to read the indictment. Apparently not. That seems to be the problem with a lot of people. They listen to those who know nothing or they form an opinion on a sound bite and ignore facts in favor of what they want to believe. I've made it a policy not to argue with people like that. It's like arguing with a mule. You can do so until you're blue in the face and the mule ain't going to pay no mind.

TA

Comshaw

34 charges of misdemeanor false business record entries for which the statute of limitations has run out UNLESS there's another crime which bootstraps those misdemeanors into felonies.

Tell us what other crime did Trump commit? You can just cite the statute if you want to.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

If Trump has t been charged with a crime what defense could they possibly present?
Any competent attorney would have the case thrown out of the prosecution hasn’t said what they’re charging the defendant with.

Try reading the article I posted.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Try reading the article I posted.

I did, it isn’t addressed anywhere except where the prosecutor explicitly tells the jury what Trump tried to cover up.
It doesn’t address what Trump’s lawyers did.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

34 charges of misdemeanor false business record entries for which the statute of limitations has run out UNLESS there's another crime which bootstraps those misdemeanors into felonies.

Why not just answer the question. What crime did Trump attempt to commit or cover up? You claim to know. Why keep dodging?

*chuckles*

I'm not sure which way I want the verdict to go, Trump convicted or acquitted....the incessant bellyaching you two offer up makes me lean towards conviction as being the most entertaining....

 

[jaF0]

I thought that perhaps you and TST had enough intelligence and maturity to read the indictment. Apparently not.

I've made it a policy not to argue with people like that.

And yet, you continue to do so.

 

[HisArpy]

*chuckles*

I'm not sure which way I want the verdict to go, Trump convicted or acquitted....the incessant bellyaching you two offer up makes me lean towards conviction as being the most entertaining....

Apparently you can't name the crime either.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

I did, it isn’t addressed anywhere except where the prosecutor explicitly tells the jury what Trump tried to cover up.
It doesn’t address what Trump’s lawyers did.

Yet you are still unable to identify what the crime is that the prosecutor alleges Trump tried to commit or cover up. Keep trying.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

*chuckles*

Me either. Anything can happen with a jury trial. Especially in NY. It would be helpful if the prosecutor would reveal what the crime is that Trump allegedly tried to commit or cover up. SpiderMan has been searching all afternoon.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yet you are still unable to identify what the crime is that the prosecutor alleges Trump tried to commit or cover up. Keep trying.

No I’m not. I’m still asking you to explain why the trial has gotten this far.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

No I’m not. I’m still asking you to explain why the trial has gotten this far.

Because jury trials usually don’t end until both sides have presented their cases, closing arguments have been made, and the jury deliberates. The prosecution has presented its case. The defense presents next week. Hope that helps.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Because jury trials usually don’t end until both sides have presented their cases, closing arguments have been made, and the jury deliberates. The prosecution has presented its case. The defense presents next week. Hope that helps.

This is the third time you’ve avoided my question and answered your own straw man question.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

This is the third time you’ve avoided my question and answered your own straw man question.

We’ve established your inability to identify the crime that Trump allegedly tried to commit or cover up. You’re dismissed.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Apparently you can't name the crime either.

Thanks, you've made up my mind on which verdict I'd have the most fun with.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Me either. Anything can happen with a jury trial. Especially in NY. It would be helpful if the prosecutor would reveal what the crime is that Trump allegedly tried to commit or cover up. SpiderMan has been searching all afternoon.

Falsifying business records, 34 times in the first degree,charged under statute under Article 174 of New York State penal code.

Hell even the WP covered this, and you post shit from there daily....guess you only read the headlines that make your day, eh?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/04/trump-charges-34-counts-felony/

What are people like you called again?...oh right "wilfully blind"

 

[Bray123]

There are none so blind as those who don't want to see.

Damn, I've become my own Grandma.

 

[Bn2f]

People, people, people. Do not let these idiots frustrate you. The time for the claim that no crime was committed has long since passed. Had they defended co-conspirator #2 as being innocent before his ass went to prison then they may maybe would have merit to their claim now that #1 did nothing as well. They didn’t then and can’t now.

This 34 count indictment trial has continued as this band of numbnuts have been playing the same tune on the sinking deck of the trumptanic. A hung trump jury is their only hope and Stormy’s deposition has made it clear that hung and trump are 2 words not synonymous.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Falsifying business records, 34 times in the first degree,charged under statute under Article 174 of New York State penal code.

Hell even the WP covered this, and you post shit from there daily....guess you only read the headlines that make your day, eh?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/04/trump-charges-34-counts-felony/

What are people like you called again?...oh right "wilfully blind"

Fuzzy, the WaPo article you shared is over a year old. We know that the charges feature 134 counts of falsification. Basically one count for each invoice, ledger entry and check to pay Cohen. If you and SpiderMan had read the article in my post, you would understand that falsifying business records is a felony in New York only if it is done to conceal or commit another crime.

The reason you and Spiderman can’t identify the the crime is because it hasn’t been identified by the prosecution.

As reported in Wall Street Journal this morning:

“Bragg’s indictment didn’t say what that other crime was. And prosecutors still haven’t identified the specific offense to jurors.”

Here’s the link the the WSJ report:

A Trump Conviction Depends on Proving More Than a Hush-Money Coverup
Prosecution’s case hangs on an alleged second crime that hasn’t yet been spelled out for the jury
https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/a-t...lefpfph0jjtjp17&reflink=article_copyURL_share

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

We’ve established your inability to identify the crime that Trump allegedly tried to commit or cover up. You’re dismissed.

While I’m enjoying your meltdown I feel a little bad about it. You keep ascribing me a position I never adopted or straw manning.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

While I’m enjoying your meltdown I feel a little bad about it. You keep ascribing me a position I never adopted or straw manning.

Maybe someday the unidentified crime will be revealed by the prosecution.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Maybe someday the unidentified crime will be revealed by the prosecution.

Did you read the article you linked?