Colorado Will Not Be Allowed To Deny Trump Access To Their Presidential Ballot

activist judges bastardizing the constitution.
Activist judges.

Drink!

Trump will be on the 3/4 ballot in CO.
How about Maine?
Breaking News: The Secretary of State of Maine has disqualified Donald Trump from the 2024 election ballot, citing 14th amendment.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics/trump-maine-14th-amendment-ballot

Trump team immediately dials up the vitriol to 11:
n047taostac51.jpg
 
They decide their state ballot and elections. As the decision mentioned.
Jesus, you are hard headed, have you not heard of due process? Read section 5 Congress enforces the 14th, not the states.
 
Of course there is doubt.

Only for people who are retarded. You could at least attempt to claim that he was speaking rhetorically and had no idea what would happen. I mean its possible he's never seen an unruly mob before.
 
Jesus, you are hard headed, have you not heard of due process? Read section 5 Congress enforces the 14th, not the states.
Yes, it doesn't refer to insurrection. Hope this helps!
 
Those of us on top of this issue have known all along Trump would be on the Colorado March ballot. The only surprise was the state’s SOS stepping in to spare the state’s Supreme Court a supreme smack down. The action today is in the best interest of Colorado and the country.
 
Lol. Two of the dumbest people here act like they know more than people who worked their entire lives to be in the position to make this decision.
Our government is chock full of dumbass bureaucrats who would bastardize the constitution in a New York minute to maintain power.
 
Our government is chock full of dumbass bureaucrats who would bastardize the constitution in a New York minute to maintain power.
Since when is a supreme court judge a bureaucrat who tries to bastardize the constitution? Your need to carry Trump's water is palpable.
 
In the second impeachment a congressional vote failed to convict Trump for insurrection.
True but irrelevant. What the CO court did does not require a conviction.
The Colorado ruling predicated its ruling on alleged participation in an insurrection. Section I of the 14th A explains due process. The Colorado ruling failed due process, Insurrection is a federal statute and violating that statute is a felony. The Colorado ruling is a political decision not based on constitutional law. We’ll see how SCOTUS rules.
In plain English, you're hoping the Coathanger Five will hand down a political decision that you will choose to pretend is based on Constitutional law. At least please be honest about it.
You know those 4 Colorado Supreme Court judges are wrong. Section III of the 14th doesn’t state a conviction is or is not necessary, however Sec III is prefaced by section I of the 14th which states due process and equal protection under the law.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Kicking a treasonous politician off the ballot is not depriving him of life, liberty or property.

She's a crazed leftwing polemicist and a proven liar.
Even if I agreed with any of that (and I don't, except for left-wing, and I consider that a good thing), it's neither here nor there with respect to your earlier post implying that she's stupid.
 
*chuckle*


Somebody in Maine just launched their next political campaign.
Is she running for Congress? The Senate?
Kamala's running mate?


🕶️
 
Because Biden didn’t try to overthrow the government.
Neither did Trump. However there is abundant physical and circumstantial evidence that Biden took bribes and failed to secure our border and our national security. That amounts to treason, bribes and misdemeanors. Maybe Biden should be eliminated from republican state ballots. I hope not, with Biden on the ballot Trump wins.
 
*chuckle*


Somebody in Maine just launched their next political campaign.
Is she running for Congress? The Senate?
Kamala's running mate?


🕶️
Unlikely, since both of Maine's House members are already Democrats and the next Senate race has an incumbent who caucuses with the Dems.
 
Neither did Trump.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
However there is abundant physical and circumstantial evidence that Biden took bribes and failed to secure our border and our national security.
No there isn't. What there is lots and lots of is discredited right-wing propaganda.
I hope not, with Biden on the ballot Trump wins.
This is exactly what the likes of you were saying before the last election, too.
 
True but irrelevant. What the CO court did does not require a conviction.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

prev | next
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.“

Insurrection is a federal statute. If the courts use that statute for a ruling against someone then the nature of the statute requires due process, a trial, a verdict and conviction.
In plain English, you're hoping the Coathanger Five will hand down a political decision that you will choose to pretend is based on Constitutional law. At least please be honest about it.
I believe the SCOTUS ruling will be unanimous. Using the handle coathanger five just proves your contempt for the court. The overturning of R vs W was nothing more than correcting a bad ruling.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Kicking a treasonous politician off the ballot is not depriving him of life, liberty or property.
What’s your point? My point is due process and equal protection under the law.
Even if I agreed with any of that (and I don't, except for left-wing, and I consider that a good thing), it's neither here nor there with respect to your earlier post implying that she's stupid.
Spoken like a true Marxist.
 
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Mainly you!
No there isn't. What there is lots and lots of is discredited right-wing propaganda.
You need to stop watching MSNBC.
This is exactly what the likes of you were saying before the last election, too.
Voter fraud was rampant. I’ll give that Biden won thanks to a corrupt media, without out it Trump would have won in a landslide.
 

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

prev | next
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.“

Insurrection is a federal statute. If the courts use that statute for a ruling against someone then the nature of the statute requires due process, a trial, a verdict and conviction.
No, it does not. OJ was acquitted, then found liable in the civil suit against him, just for one particularly famous example. Likewise, the issue at hand in Colorado was a civil one, not a criminal one. Civil suits have a lower standard of proof than criminal ones.
I believe the SCOTUS ruling will be unanimous.
You also believed Trump would beat Biden in 2020.
Using the handle coathanger five just proves your contempt for the court.
I certainly don't deny that I have great contempt for the Coathanger Five.
The overturning of R vs W was nothing more than correcting a bad ruling.
Oh, but it was a great deal more than that.
Spoken like a true Marxist.
...is what you always say when you have no substantial response to offer.
Voter fraud was rampant. I’ll give that Biden won thanks to a corrupt media, without out it Trump would have won in a landslide.
Your side has had three years to prove that, and you literally haven't found a single example of voter fraud in Biden's favor - but there have been several in Trump's favor.
 
Neither did Trump. However there is abundant physical and circumstantial evidence that Biden took bribes and failed to secure our border and our national security. That amounts to treason, bribes and misdemeanors. Maybe Biden should be eliminated from republican state ballots. I hope not, with Biden on the ballot Trump wins.
There’s an abundance of evidence showing that Trump did, including Trump’s own words. Courts have seen this evidence and agreed.
 
Back
Top