Colorado Will Not Be Allowed To Deny Trump Access To Their Presidential Ballot

[Lazaran]

RussiaGuide is having problems with the definition of “testimony”.



RussiaGuide

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

RussiaGuide is having problems with the definition of “testimony”.



RussiaGuide

Not his only problem.

 

[Lazaran]

Not his only problem.

It would probably crash the site if you tried to list all of RussiaGuide’s problems.

*nods*

It would definitely crash the site if you tried to list all of the RWCJ "members’" problems.

*nods*

 

[dkovic77]

I doubt that very seriously. You haven't demonstrated any learned ability other than making false statements about sources being wrong and producing zero evidence to back it up. You post like a man or a girl with a paper asshole.

The information is already incorrect because your “sources” are biased and take a side.

Again, swing by your local library and ask anyone who works there about the veracity of your “sources”.

You base ALL of your arguments on “sources” that don’t give you a solid foundation and you want to talk about facts? You click on enough of those sources daily, the rest of us know better than to fall for that and more clicks to them to help them bolster their ad revenue.

How much of a cut do you get? Do you document everything per link to see how much you can try to drive up traffic?

Just send all these links along with the other daily email forwards you get that has all of this “content”.

 

[ll74]

The more I read the Colorado decision and dissents, the more impressed I am with the textualist slant of the decision and the weakness of the dissent. SCOTUS is basically going to tie themselves in knots if they want to use a textual argument to strike it down.

Gorsuch basically would have to argue against his own words.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

The more I read the Colorado decision and dissents, the more impressed I am with the textualist slant of the decision and the weakness of the dissent. SCOTUS is basically going to tie themselves in knots if they want to use a textual argument to strike it down.

Gorsuch basically would have to argue against his own words.

No he wouldn’t

 

[ll74]

No he wouldn’t

Of course he would. He's quoted in the ruling.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nei...rado-ruling-disqualified-trump-ballot-2023-12

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Of course he would. He's quoted in the ruling.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nei...rado-ruling-disqualified-trump-ballot-2023-12

Hassan was constitutionally prohibited from serving in office.

 

[ll74]

Hassan was constitutionally prohibited from serving in office.

The 14th amendment is part of the Constitution.

"As then-Judge Gorsuch recognized in Hassan, it is 'a state's legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process' that 'permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office,'" the state opinion reads.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

The 14th amendment is part of the Constitution.

Yes it is.

 

[ll74]

Yes it is.

Glad we agree.

 

[ByteMe13]

The more I read the Colorado decision and dissents, the more impressed I am with the textualist slant of the decision and the weakness of the dissent. SCOTUS is basically going to tie themselves in knots if they want to use a textual argument to strike it down.

Gorsuch basically would have to argue against his own words.

SCOTUS could easily issue an opinion in the vein of Bush v Gore : we don’t have any legal justification for what we are doing, and we aren’t setting any precedent but we are doing ruling for Trump because we can.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

SCOTUS could easily issue an opinion in the vein of Bush v Gore : we don’t have any legal justification for what we are doing, and we aren’t setting any precedent but we are doing ruling for Trump because we can.

As 1184 pointed out, the 14th amendment is in the constitution. The CO Supreme Court ruling will be overturned.

 

[ll74]

Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling​

 

[ByteMe13]

Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling​

The MAGA crowd is going to do everything and anything to get Orange Jesus back as president

 

[RandyRebecca]

The MAGA crowd is going to do everything and anything to get Orange Jesus back as president

Biden and the DNC are doing that all by themselves.

Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling​

Never mind, at least they're not Palestinians in Gaza right now. Let's keep a sense of perspective here.

 

[YDB95]

Yeah like Whoopi Goldberg and Rachel Maddow.

Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar from Stanford. I sincerely doubt your education measures up to that.

 

[dkovic77]

Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar from Stanford. I sincerely doubt your education measures up to that.

ITT measures up to that doesn’t it?

Or more likely he did those Sally Strothers correspondence courses.

 

[Rick345]

So, 4 judges can render a guilty verdict without a trial.

If your rebuttal is section III does not require a conviction then what is the foundation for the ruling? No trial, no conviction just an arbitrary ruling predicated on what? Insurrection is a felony charge. Using that statute without due process is opening up pandora’s box. More of Democrats destroying democracy to save democracy. Let the people decide who they want on the ballot.

Yes! No trial is necessary the insurrection clause is a direct result of the American Civil War and there are cases of Confederate politicians and military officers being banned from running for political office from May 1865 onward. President Jefferson Davis, never had a trial and was banded from running for office. Confederates Kenneth Worthy nor Couy Griffin were accused of engaging in violence, yet both were ruled to be disqualified because they knowingly and voluntarily aided insurrections and banned from running office they were never tired. There are dozens of other Confederates banded from running for office none were ever tired.

There is a remedy for Trump he merely has to convince 2/3s of Congress to let him run, that is in the Constitution but following the Constitution is not his strong suit.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

The Supreme Court of the swing state of Michigan has just closed the door on efforts to deny voters their right to choose.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The Supreme Court of the swing state of Michigan has just closed the door on efforts to deny voters their right to choose.

So Barack Obama can run in Michigan?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The Supreme Court of the swing state of Michigan has just closed the door on efforts to deny voters their right to choose.

That's not what the court did actually. But you take your wins where you can!

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

So Barack Obama can run in Michigan?

Sure. Most Democrats are probably wishing he would.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Sure. Most Democrats are probably wishing he would.

And he would crush Trump worse than Biden did.
Where in the court ruling did it say he could run?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

And he would crush Trump worse than Biden did.
Where in the court ruling did it say he could run?

I agree. Obama would win easily. I’m sure many other Democrats would as well but the party leadership has doubled down on an octogenarian incumbent with historically low approval ratings.