Colorado Will Not Be Allowed To Deny Trump Access To Their Presidential Ballot

section I ~ 14th A;

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
What's that got to do with 14.3?

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

If the MAGAT party are so determined to have the Insurrectionist Fraudster as their candidate, it says right there that all they have to do is vote two-thirds to discount this section.
 
What's that got to do with 14.3?

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

If the MAGAT party are so determined to have the Insurrectionist Fraudster as their candidate, it says right there that all they have to do is vote two-thirds to discount this section.
So, 4 judges can render a guilty verdict without a trial.

If your rebuttal is section III does not require a conviction then what is the foundation for the ruling? No trial, no conviction just an arbitrary ruling predicated on what? Insurrection is a felony charge. Using that statute without due process is opening up pandora’s box. More of Democrats destroying democracy to save democracy. Let the people decide who they want on the ballot.
 
The case was filed by Republicans because they interpreted section 3 a way you disagree with. That's their right. You disagreeing with those Republicans and blaming it on Democrats continues to be your issue, not theirs.

The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with their interpretation......that isn't because they are wrong.....it's because that is an interpretation they made.
That would be RINOS who knew that Democrats would rule on it.
 
That would be RINOS who knew that Democrats would rule on it.
You may not agree with their actions, but they are registered Republicans. Calling them something different doesn't make them not a Republican.
 
Communists (that is, real communists, in the Karl Marx sense) set about building workers' democracy with the intent of increasing living standards in order to end the need for money, classes and government to even exist. I don't see Democrats doing that in any way, as they enrich billionaire capitalists, like the Republicans also do.

Communists seek to build workers' own government, judges, laws, armed people etc. and would only do something like an insurrection in order sweep away the capitalist government and authorities at the correct time, such as what the Russian Bolsheviks did in 1917 with the October Revolution. On that day (November 7, 1917, using our calendar), they swept aside the capitalist government and transferred all political power to the Soviets (i.e. workers' councils, which were controlled by workers, peasants and soldiers). This was only done when the Bolsheviks had a majority in the Soviets in the working class dominated cities in Russia, which took months of struggle, so the insurrection was done in order to put all power in workers' hands and sweep aside the capitalists who only take from them.

History is fascinating to learn. It's all out there.
Here we have American Marxism.
 
That's not it at all. Unlike you, I know what it says and what it means.
The Colorado Supreme Court also knows what it says and what it means....it's their job. Sorry you don't like that.
 
The Colorado Supreme Court also knows what it says and what it means....it's their job. Sorry you don't like that.
Yet they will be reversed. Knowing what it says and thinking you know what it says are two different things.
 
Yet they will be reversed. Knowing what it says and thinking you know what it says are two different things.
I know what it says. All of it. I don't doubt that it will be reversed due to political considerations.
 
Thats a pretty stupid question.

Read the speech! There’s much more to the story than “I hate Trump therefore he’s guilty”.
I'm sure you're aware you're dealing with a goose-stepping mental midget.
;)
 
All those lawyers. All those Judges. And all it takes to explain the Constitution to those Ivy League graduates is an anonymous poster on an obscure forum who has studied the equivalent forum on Breitbart.
 
So, 4 judges can render a guilty verdict without a trial.

If your rebuttal is section III does not require a conviction then what is the foundation for the ruling? No trial, no conviction just an arbitrary ruling predicated on what? Insurrection is a felony charge. Using that statute without due process is opening up pandora’s box. More of Democrats destroying democracy to save democracy. Let the people decide who they want on the ballot.
Ok. Let Obama run in 2024.
 
Ken Block, founder of Simpatico Software Systems (the company that Trump himself chose and hired to investigate voter fraud) has been subpoenaed to give evidence.

He is saying on TV for all to hear that he told Trump prior to Jan 6 that there was no sign of voter fraud, it was all bollocks. So Trump told all his goons in their stupidity hats to fight like hell and take over the Capitol already knowing that it was fake news.
 
Ken Block, founder of Simpatico Software Systems (the company that Trump himself chose and hired to investigate voter fraud) has been subpoenaed to give evidence.

He is saying on TV for all to hear that he told Trump prior to Jan 6 that there was no sign of voter fraud, it was all bollocks. So Trump told all his goons in their stupidity hats to fight like hell and take over the Capitol already knowing that it was fake news.
And now Trump knows that the only way for him to dodge legal accountability for his many trails of lies is to become President again, so he can complete his rigging of the US judicial system.
 
And now Trump knows that the only way for him to dodge legal accountability for his many trails of lies is to become President again, so he can complete his rigging of the US judicial system.
Trump thinks that, he doesn’t know that.
 
More educated than you I guarantee. But keep believing your alternative opinions that make you feel good.
I doubt that very seriously. You haven't demonstrated any learned ability other than making false statements about sources being wrong and producing zero evidence to back it up. You post like a man or a girl with a paper asshole.
 
Ken Block, founder of Simpatico Software Systems (the company that Trump himself chose and hired to investigate voter fraud) has been subpoenaed to give evidence.

He is saying on TV for all to hear that he told Trump prior to Jan 6 that there was no sign of voter fraud, it was all bollocks. So Trump told all his goons in their stupidity hats to fight like hell and take over the Capitol already knowing that it was fake news.

MOST of the people providing testimony of the corrupt orange traitor’s guilt are "all the best people".

*nods*
 
Back
Top