Judge Overturns Connecticut Election

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
66,985

Connecticut Court Overturns Fraudulent Election Due to Ballot Box Voter Fraud – Will Michigan Be Next or Will They Allow the Lawlessness to Continue?​

By Jim Hoft

In early September 2022, The Gateway Pundit released a shocking video compilation (see video below) of individuals and sometimes teams of people depositing stacks of ballots into absentee ballot drop boxes at Detroit’s satellite voting centers before the November 2020 election.

The Gateway Pundit was the only media outlet in the country to request and obtain the video footage of the Detroit drop boxes during the 2020 presidential election.

What we found was shocking.

100 Percent Fed Up reported at the time – The Gateway Pundit and 100 Percent Fed Up have been working with a team of investigators at MC4EI to uncover potential voter-related crimes and “irregularities” found on hundreds of hours of Detroit satellite office surveillance footage


After months of pouring through 24 terabytes of data, MC4EI was able to put together a compilation of voter after voter dropping off more than one ballot into a drop box in Michigan. Over 16,000 hours of surveillance footage from 37 days of early voting were carefully scrutinized. To the best of our knowledge, no other state in the nation has done a more thorough investigation into early voting via drop boxes than in Michigan, where election law says only one ballot may be case per voter, except a voter who deposits ballots on behalf of an immediate family member or immediate family members.

Here is our video:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...overturns-fraudulent-election-due-ballot-box/

Of course, every leftist here says this shit never happens.
 
Actually I believe the Connecticut court only overturned the primary election and ordered a "do over."

This creates problems since the 2 primary winners are on next week's general election ballot.

If the challenger to the primary results (Gomes) wins next Tuesday, then there's no issue. But, if his opponent wins, and the primary is required to be redone, then the upcoming election result means that the redone primary will be irrelevant since the supposed "cheater" already won election to office.

This illustrates the problem with making election challenges, by the time the court hears and decides the matter, it's too late to do anything if illegalities are proven. The remedy is to either outlaw election challenges no matter the reason; go back to hand counting election day ballots and outlaw mail in ballots, have the counting done in real time without allowing any results to be tabulated until all counting is finished, set a time frame for all counting to be completed and any remaining uncounted ballots after that point in time cannot be included as part of the results; or to have courts ready to hear election challenges and rule on the evidence that is presented at the hearing within 1 day.

Until we actually secure our elections against fraud, we will continue to have elections where we cannot be sure the results are factual or based on legal ballots.

Personally I'd be fine with option #1 above IF ballot harvesting was illegal in all districts and there was a uniform method of collecting and counting ballots which could be crosschecked in real time against an accurate list of eligible voters.

It's that last part where the sticking point is. IMO all voter rolls should be purged 9 months post election and all voters required to re-register in person at the registrar's office. No mail or internet in registration allowed and PROOF of residency and ID is required. This alone would eliminate most of the graveyard ballots and ballot box stuffing issues because the voter rolls would only include those who intended to vote in the upcoming election and who could prove their identity and residency.

Anyone caught voting more than once or outside their legal district, or attempting to coerce or advising anyone else into doing so either in person or through any medium, would be subject to a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose their Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. Any evidence, no matter how insignificant, showing a violation would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.
 
We have repeatedly acknowledged that there were some isolated (as in, one person here and there) instances of voter fraud in 2020.

Of course, we know exactly why Rightguide doesn't remember that: every single one of those cases involved a Trump voter trying to vote twice.
 

Connecticut Court Overturns Fraudulent Election Due to Ballot Box Voter Fraud – Will Michigan Be Next or Will They Allow the Lawlessness to Continue?​

By Jim Hoft

In early September 2022, The Gateway Pundit released a shocking video compilation (see video below) of individuals and sometimes teams of people depositing stacks of ballots into absentee ballot drop boxes at Detroit’s satellite voting centers before the November 2020 election.

The Gateway Pundit was the only media outlet in the country to request and obtain the video footage of the Detroit drop boxes during the 2020 presidential election.

What we found was shocking.

100 Percent Fed Up reported at the time – The Gateway Pundit and 100 Percent Fed Up have been working with a team of investigators at MC4EI to uncover potential voter-related crimes and “irregularities” found on hundreds of hours of Detroit satellite office surveillance footage


After months of pouring through 24 terabytes of data, MC4EI was able to put together a compilation of voter after voter dropping off more than one ballot into a drop box in Michigan. Over 16,000 hours of surveillance footage from 37 days of early voting were carefully scrutinized. To the best of our knowledge, no other state in the nation has done a more thorough investigation into early voting via drop boxes than in Michigan, where election law says only one ballot may be case per voter, except a voter who deposits ballots on behalf of an immediate family member or immediate family members.

Here is our video:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...overturns-fraudulent-election-due-ballot-box/

Of course, every leftist here says this shit never happens.
This the same edit job Tucker did with the J6 footage?

They do some Face ID and find it’s mostly registered MAGA folks?

So great that fraud is found, it does happen. Usually it’s ‘pubs.
 
Actually I believe the Connecticut court only overturned the primary election and ordered a "do over."

This creates problems since the 2 primary winners are on next week's general election ballot.

If the challenger to the primary results (Gomes) wins next Tuesday, then there's no issue. But, if his opponent wins, and the primary is required to be redone, then the upcoming election result means that the redone primary will be irrelevant since the supposed "cheater" already won election to office.

This illustrates the problem with making election challenges, by the time the court hears and decides the matter, it's too late to do anything if illegalities are proven. The remedy is to either outlaw election challenges no matter the reason; go back to hand counting election day ballots and outlaw mail in ballots, have the counting done in real time without allowing any results to be tabulated until all counting is finished, set a time frame for all counting to be completed and any remaining uncounted ballots after that point in time cannot be included as part of the results; or to have courts ready to hear election challenges and rule on the evidence that is presented at the hearing within 1 day.

Until we actually secure our elections against fraud, we will continue to have elections where we cannot be sure the results are factual or based on legal ballots.

Personally I'd be fine with option #1 above IF ballot harvesting was illegal in all districts and there was a uniform method of collecting and counting ballots which could be crosschecked in real time against an accurate list of eligible voters.

It's that last part where the sticking point is. IMO all voter rolls should be purged 9 months post election and all voters required to re-register in person at the registrar's office. No mail or internet in registration allowed and PROOF of residency and ID is required. This alone would eliminate most of the graveyard ballots and ballot box stuffing issues because the voter rolls would only include those who intended to vote in the upcoming election and who could prove their identity and residency.

Anyone caught voting more than once or outside their legal district, or attempting to coerce or advising anyone else into doing so either in person or through any medium, would be subject to a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose their Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. Any evidence, no matter how insignificant, showing a violation would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.
Sounds good to me.
 
Trump voted outside of his legal district in 2019 so should get a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose his Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. There's plenty of evidence, way beyond insignificant, that shows a violation that would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.
 
Trump voted outside of his legal district in 2019 so should get a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose his Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. There's plenty of evidence, way beyond insignificant, that shows a violation that would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.

I believe he voted by mail. So if doing that is illegal, we have lots and lots and lots of US Military personnel and elected officials who are going to be in lots and lots and lots of trouble.

Basically, you touting this nonsense just proves you're a moron.
 
I believe he voted by mail. So if doing that is illegal, we have lots and lots and lots of US Military personnel and elected officials who are going to be in lots and lots and lots of trouble.

Basically, you touting this nonsense just proves you're a moron.
If you are seriously saying you think that is my position you're the moron.

Correction; you're the moron either way. I was just quoting you with the insertion of 'Trump' as the subject. :ROFLMAO:
 
If you are seriously saying you think that is my position you're the moron.

Correction; you're the moron either way. I was just quoting you with the insertion of 'Trump' as the subject. :ROFLMAO:


Well, then trot out your PROOF that Trump ILLEGALLY voted outside his residential district. Not an accusation, PROOF is required here.

Otherwise you're still nothing but a loudmouthed moron spewing lies.
 
Well, then trot out your PROOF that Trump ILLEGALLY voted outside his residential district. Not an accusation, PROOF is required here.

Otherwise you're still nothing but a loudmouthed moron spewing lies.
You're the last fucking person who should be talking about Proof....
Because we don't elect President's based on popularity or majority of votes.

And please don't try to tell us that there wasn't a lot of bullshit going on during the election. The facts are known that at least one commissioner illegally changed the voting laws in their state which was pivotal in getting Brandon elected.

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing. What you refuse to acknowledge is that SOMETHING went wrong in the last election and that the current reviews and investigations are slowly uncovering what that was.

From what I see, the REASON you're refusing to acknowledge it is because you don't care how much illegality occurred if it meant getting rid of the Orange Man. Which stated more simply is an "end justifies the means" position.

Yet, you also are very vocal about how the current "means" to stop it from happening again is somehow "racist." Which illustrates that your true position is that the ends justifies the means ONLY IF the outcome is in your favor.

How fucking childish of you to put that out there where the world can see it. Of course now I expect that you'll do the regular deflection of "show me where I said that." Which is the typical deflection away from the uncomfortable exposure you're having to face right now not unlike the Ad Hom attacks going on in this thread.

Closing your eyes to what's going on doesn't mean there's no evidence. It means you're refusing to accept the evidence that SOMETHING went wrong in the 2020 elections.

Az's Senate audit shows it and complaining about the linked source's reliability doesn't alter the bottom line.

Wisconsin's audit of their election shows it too. Meanwhile the loonies are focused on the last sentence of the summary which only says that the results can't be changed while IGNORING the fact that the results are because SOMETHING WENT WRONG in the election.

Then there's the fact that some States which recognized that something went wrong and enacted laws to fix the problem were criticized by the Left for "enacting Jim Crow 2.0" rather than acknowledging that the States have the right, power, and obligation to prevent uncertainty in their elections. But rather than admitting even that truth, the Left decided to try to take over and Federalize State elections while allowing the same errors to continue and actually increase and spread to other States.

So, as it stands, you're ignorance is either because it's self inflicted or you're just too fucking stupid to get beyond the "Trump lost" bullshit narrative. You should work on fixing that because somewhere in there SOMETHING is obviously wrong.
You have done nothing but whine about the 2020 election, claiming there was fraud, but to this date not one shred of evidence have you managed to show...You're just a carbon water drinking dumbfuck american....*chuckles*
 
This is the type of fucked up logic that gets me so fed up with the crap I read from Tanjaguar (aka Hisarpy's latest incarnation,) and Rightguide:

"...There is DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that there was massive fraud in the 2020 election. Several instances of Trump voters having voted twice, and numerous illegal votes were cast for Trump. (And maybe one or two illegal votes for Biden.) Therefore, we should just toss out the election results and automatically install Trump as President."

Just, as I have said so many times....childishly moronic logic.
And a stubborn refusal to acknowlege 1) that Trump did in fact lose the election- by seven million votes at that- and 2) that he was, and continues to be, a toxic influence in every aspect of American politics. Both through his words, actions, and "third-world kleptocracy" policies.

I get so sick of that bullshit.

Just...I sometimes just want to grab these people and just shake them- like wake the fuck up, GROW the fuck up, and open your eyes! Or at least, stop even trying to pretend you are an American (and not a Russian Bot) or not a forum troll.
 
Anyone that's given the subject any thought understands that drop boxes and ballot harvesting are an invitation to fraud. Videos emerged re. the 2020 election that should the same activity taking place. Yes, the courts did nothing, in fact they steadfastly held that 'nothing happened here.' Given the blow back from the 2000 election the courts are scared shit less to interfere and when they do, such as in PA., they interfere in a manner favoring one party over another in violation of the law.

There is a thread here stating that the 2024 election maybe the last election decided at the polls, and there is some merit to that assertion. Until our elections are secure, one person, one vote. And that the person voting is who they say they are and eligible. Unless that happens the problem is only going to get worse.
 
What happens if, in 2024, there are no drop boxes, no ballot harvesting, nothing in question.... and the courts, and repeated, deep election audits still show that the Democratic candidate won?

In your view, that would still be a "Fraudulent Election" and not legit. You'd come up with some bullshit reason, but at the end of the day, the real reason is, you didn't like the outcome simply because the Democratic candidate won. So, you cry "Fraud."

And what would happen if, in 2024, there was PLENTY of videotaped evidence of ballot stuffing, ballot harvesting, people voting multiple times, and documented proof of ballots for the Democratic candidate being discarded or tossed, and Trump won?

Would you still say it was "Fraudulent" then? We all know the answer:
No, you would not.

Because, as you have demonstrated repeatedly, in your many different guises, you are incapable of being intellectually honest here.

It was never about "Fraud" or any evidence of tampering. It was an excuse, a myth that was shamelessly promoted by your candidate, because your candidate lost. And that is ALL it EVER was.
 
Anyone that's given the subject any thought understands that drop boxes and ballot harvesting are an invitation to fraud.
No only idiots like you think that!
Videos emerged re. the 2020 election that should the same activity taking place. Yes, the courts did nothing, in fact they steadfastly held that 'nothing happened here.
Yes, those debunked video's that showed nothing nefarious actually occurred, which is why the courts did nothing.
' Given the blow back from the 2000 election the courts are scared shit less to interfere and when they do, such as in PA., they interfere in a manner favoring one party over another in violation of the law.
The only "blow back, is from idiots like you.

Until our elections are secure, one
They are secure!! It's just the weak minded person who fails to consider all the evidence, and who only looks to biased opinion pieces instead of real news sources thinks that.
 
In TanChobhamJaguar's childish little world, elections are only "Secure" if his preferred candidate wins.

It's really that simple, because HE's really that simple.
 
Well, then trot out your PROOF that Trump ILLEGALLY voted outside his residential district. Not an accusation, PROOF is required here.

Otherwise you're still nothing but a loudmouthed moron spewing lies.
Are you really that dumb?

Trump voted purporting to be a resident of Florida whilst he was residing in Washington DC. In the the farking White House. Whilst Mar a Lardo was not registered as anyone's residence.

Do you want me to feed you his ballot paper through the electrons into your computer?


Let's just remind you of your own stupid words:
Anyone caught voting more than once or outside their legal district, or attempting to coerce or advising anyone else into doing so either in person or through any medium, would be subject to a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose their Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. Any evidence, no matter how insignificant, showing a violation would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.
 
Anyone that's given the subject any thought understands that drop boxes and ballot harvesting are an invitation to fraud. Videos emerged re. the 2020 election that should the same activity taking place. Yes, the courts did nothing, in fact they steadfastly held that 'nothing happened here.' Given the blow back from the 2000 election the courts are scared shit less to interfere and when they do, such as in PA., they interfere in a manner favoring one party over another in violation of the law.

There is a thread here stating that the 2024 election maybe the last election decided at the polls, and there is some merit to that assertion. Until our elections are secure, one person, one vote. And that the person voting is who they say they are and eligible. Unless that happens the problem is only going to get worse.
Do yoy have the slightest notion what happens to ballots delivered to dropboxes? Or even how those ballots were distributed to be used by voters? Or how many safeguards are imposed on ballots because of the efforts of your party reps?
 
Actually I believe the Connecticut court only overturned the primary election and ordered a "do over."

This creates problems since the 2 primary winners are on next week's general election ballot.

If the challenger to the primary results (Gomes) wins next Tuesday, then there's no issue. But, if his opponent wins, and the primary is required to be redone, then the upcoming election result means that the redone primary will be irrelevant since the supposed "cheater" already won election to office.

This illustrates the problem with making election challenges, by the time the court hears and decides the matter, it's too late to do anything if illegalities are proven. The remedy is to either outlaw election challenges no matter the reason; go back to hand counting election day ballots and outlaw mail in ballots, have the counting done in real time without allowing any results to be tabulated until all counting is finished, set a time frame for all counting to be completed and any remaining uncounted ballots after that point in time cannot be included as part of the results; or to have courts ready to hear election challenges and rule on the evidence that is presented at the hearing within 1 day.

Until we actually secure our elections against fraud, we will continue to have elections where we cannot be sure the results are factual or based on legal ballots.

Personally I'd be fine with option #1 above IF ballot harvesting was illegal in all districts and there was a uniform method of collecting and counting ballots which could be crosschecked in real time against an accurate list of eligible voters.

It's that last part where the sticking point is. IMO all voter rolls should be purged 9 months post election and all voters required to re-register in person at the registrar's office. No mail or internet in registration allowed and PROOF of residency and ID is required. This alone would eliminate most of the graveyard ballots and ballot box stuffing issues because the voter rolls would only include those who intended to vote in the upcoming election and who could prove their identity and residency.

Anyone caught voting more than once or outside their legal district, or attempting to coerce or advising anyone else into doing so either in person or through any medium, would be subject to a mandatory 10 year prison sentence in Club Fed and lose their Right to Vote forever with no possibility of ever reinstating that lost Right. Any evidence, no matter how insignificant, showing a violation would create an irrebuttable presumption of guilt.
Love how your side is pushing for the one day elections again (with the same copy paste list too) knowing well and good it goes against a large portion of those in the electorate who don’t have the ability to take off work as they are hourly employees.

You just see the results not going your way because more people are able to vote in extended election voting and need to come up with something to keep your last grasps as what you think is control.

Same reason you want an ID to vote- one more step for someone to have to go through. Keeps those who don’t have the time from voting and since they most likely don’t vote conservative…. And yeah I know your guy thinks you need an ID to buy groceries. When is the last time he bought groceries??? When was the last time YOU bought groceries?

I bought groceries yesterday- didn’t need an ID. Can’t remember when I was ever asked for an ID to buy groceries. I’ve bought groceries in many states, easily 15 over my lifetime, never was I asked for an ID.

So please stop with your weakly shrouded attempts to clutch influence and power, you don’t have it. How many countless voter fraud cases on the right have to keep happening for you to just say most of this is on conservatives and we gotta do better. Or is registering at AirBnBs, dead mothers, voting in different districts okay as long as it is a vote for republicans?

And yes, is there evidence here in this one case in an election for Mayor? Clearly we have it. But this is not a wide spread thing. If it is, please prove it. Just like the election fraud that has been proven more widely that were all votes for the Cheeto.

If you are going to use this to try to argue for same do voting, you don’t have the argument won. The extended day voting doesn’t have the issue you have brought up here so leave that out of your rhetoric. If you want to talk about voting my mail and dropping off at a drop box, that is a discussion to have.

But wrapping it into your entire diatribe isn’t even close to the level of proof needed to cause the actions you are asking for.
 
Yup, found the dropbox fraud.

View attachment 2285985
Not the republicans?!?!? 🤣 They would never do such a thing. It’s all Hunter Biden and the left that do dirty rotten things in this country.

HUNTER BIDEN!

Wait, actual evidence?? Darn. Well that doesn’t change anything… it’s still all Hunter Biden.

Did I get that thought process correct Ican’t/idon’t, wrong guide, derpy, babyboobs? (or any of the other right wing barbershop quartet that tries to sing this same song)
 
Back
Top