For Those Lefties Lying About The Arizona Election

[zipman]

Talk about weak sauce Ad Hom denialism...

The weak sauce is continuing to promote lies that have already been debunked.

Trump lost, get the fuck over it.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Talk about weak sauce Ad Hom denialism...

We don't need a reenactment of your pathetic life story, RAPEY.

 

[HisArpy]

The weak sauce is continuing to promote lies that have already been debunked.

Trump lost, get the fuck over it.

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing. What you refuse to acknowledge is that SOMETHING went wrong in the last election and that the current reviews and investigations are slowly uncovering what that was.

From what I see, the REASON you're refusing to acknowledge it is because you don't care how much illegality occurred if it meant getting rid of the Orange Man. Which stated more simply is an "end justifies the means" position.

Yet, you also are very vocal about how the current "means" to stop it from happening again is somehow "racist." Which illustrates that your true position is that the ends justifies the means ONLY IF the outcome is in your favor.

How fucking childish of you to put that out there where the world can see it. Of course now I expect that you'll do the regular deflection of "show me where I said that." Which is the typical deflection away from the uncomfortable exposure you're having to face right now not unlike the Ad Hom attacks going on in this thread.

 

[HisArpy]

We don't need a reenactment of your pathetic life story, RAPEY.

No, you just seem to crave verification of your wasted existence. So, here's your daily dose of me seeing you trying to get attention.

 

[zipman]

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing. What you refuse to acknowledge is that SOMETHING went wrong in the last election and that the current reviews and investigations are slowly uncovering what that was.

From what I see, the REASON you're refusing to acknowledge it is because you don't care how much illegality occurred if it meant getting rid of the Orange Man. Which stated more simply is an "end justifies the means" position.

Yet, you also are very vocal about how the current "means" to stop it from happening again is somehow "racist." Which illustrates that your true position is that the ends justifies the means ONLY IF the outcome is in your favor.

How fucking childish of you to put that out there where the world can see it. Of course now I expect that you'll do the regular deflection of "show me where I said that." Which is the typical deflection away from the uncomfortable exposure you're having to face right now not unlike the Ad Hom attacks going on in this thread.

No, the reason I'm not acknowledging it is because there is no evidence of it.

Everything else you posted is just nonsense.

But hey, you used complete sentences, so there's that.

 

[ll74]

You're just a coward who cannot think for yourself. Every time you read something uncomfortable you pitifully try and tell us the source is flawed instead of his facts. You're both lazy and an intellectual coward.

The guy who produced this "study" couldn't figure out basic processes involved in mail-in voting and was openly mocked by election officials because of that.

He's not credible.

 

[pecksniff]

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing. What you refuse to acknowledge is that SOMETHING went wrong in the last election and that the current reviews and investigations are slowly uncovering what that was.

We expect things to go wrong here and there in a 50-state, 3,000-county election, every time. Nothing you are referring to is interesting or important. Certainly none of it suggests the existence of any coordinated conspiracy.

If you really care about what's wrong with our election systems, read The Voting Wars by election lawyer Richard Hasen. He diagnoses the problem: The elections are (1) hyperfederalized -- run at the county level; even a state Secretary of State has only limited oversight; and (2) partisan -- the elected county supervisors of elections are partisan officials.

 

[jomar]

You're just a coward who cannot think for yourself. Every time you read something uncomfortable you pitifully try and tell us the source is flawed instead of his facts. You're both lazy and an intellectual coward.

Sure.

On the other hand, why should I spend my time refuting your links to not credible sites that spin, lie, omit and can't pass basic fact checks. Bring something a bit "right" or down the middle if you want to be taken seriously.

 

[pecksniff]

No, you just seem to crave verification of your wasted existence. So, here's your daily dose of me seeing you trying to get attention.

And you giving it.

 

[pecksniff]

You're just a coward who cannot think for yourself. Every time you read something uncomfortable you pitifully try and tell us the source is flawed instead of his facts. You're both lazy and an intellectual coward.

It is neither lazy nor cowardly to dismiss Just the News as a zero-credibility source.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Trump

Don't know, and at this point don't care, if the study is good or not.

What I see is a bunch of assholes desperately rallying behind Ad Hom in order to avoid discussing the issue.

Talk about weak sauce...

Trump lost. Get over it.

 

[ll74]

Don't know, and at this point don't care, if the study is good or not.

What I see is a bunch of assholes desperately rallying behind Ad Hom in order to avoid discussing the issue.

Talk about weak sauce...

There only issue here is that this guy is spreading misinformation and people believe it because they don't like the election results and it gives them the feels that they are justified.

Election officials have already addressed the problems with this study's bullshit. And the guy who performed it demonstrated his lack of basic process knowledge early on in his "investigation".

 

[DeluxAuto]

Don't know, and at this point don't care, if the study is good or not.

What I see is a bunch of assholes desperately rallying behind Ad Hom in order to avoid discussing the issue.

Talk about weak sauce...

But you felt compelled to pontificate. Derp.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

I love that vetteman starts the thread with "lies of the Left" while he produces no facts to back any of his obvious bullshit.

 

[YDB95]

You're just a coward who cannot think for yourself. Every time you read something uncomfortable you pitifully try and tell us the source is flawed instead of his facts. You're both lazy and an intellectual coward.

It is a fact that you almost always use unreliable sources. It's more than fair to point that out.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing.

You need to tell Cheeto that, then. Because it's his entire point.

Even Fox News cut his ass off the mic when he was going there the last time he was on.

You proudly bought that lame horse, Matlock. Not our fault you don't wanna ride it now.

https://c.tenor.com/6TcA9vRym4MAAAAM/laugh-mock.gif

 

[ll74]

You need to tell Cheeto that, then. Because it's his entire point.

Even Fox News cut his ass off the mic when he was going there the last time he was on.

You proudly bought that lame horse, Matlock. Not our fault you don't wanna ride it now.

https://c.tenor.com/6TcA9vRym4MAAAAM/laugh-mock.gif

For the Trumpies, it's about things they believe happened that should be addressed.

And since none of it happened (or at least not to even the slightest extreme they claim), then they expect us all to address their delusions and somehow be ok with it.

Yet these are the same ones complaining about having to pay taxes because it adds a bit of funding to things they don't like

 

[PaxNurgle]

At this point it has nothing to do with Trump winning or losing. What you refuse to acknowledge is that SOMETHING went wrong in the last election and that the current reviews and investigations are slowly uncovering what that was.

We do acknowledge that something went wrong in the last election. You just cannot accept what that thing was that went wrong.

What went wrong was, one candidate lost by a significant portion of the vote, but refused to accept his loss. THAT, and only that, was what went wrong. And despite repeated attempts to prove the vote was "Fraudulent" and "Rigged", the election itself proved to be the most scrutinized in our entire history of our country...and the results still came out clean. No fraud. Trump clearly lost.

But he still could not accept that loss. And that was the real thing that went wrong. In a democratic election the loser must concede. This time. for whatever reason, that did not happen.

 

[YDB95]

We do acknowledge that something went wrong in the last election. You just cannot accept what that thing was that went wrong.

Exactly. What's "wrong" is we're getting to the point where no Republican in good standing is even able to admit publicly when they lose an election.

 

[PaxNurgle]

What the Republicans need to do, is tailor their policies - and their candidates- towards winning over people so they will vote for them, and thereby, win elections legitimately.

Now, though, What they are doing instead is courting the extremists, and trying to game the system, and when they lose, cry "Fraud!" and try to overturn elections instead of trying to actually win them legitimately. This is not how a representative democratic government should work.

I watched Kim Reynolds (Iowa governor)'s speech following Biden's earlier tonight. Her views are center-right for sure, but unlike, say, Marjorie Taylor Greene or Trump, she is someone who I could see as being electable. I agreed with some of what she said, and disagreed with some of it. She is the kind of candidate the Repubs need to run- because she would likely beat Biden legitimately due to popular support, without trying to game the system.

 

[pecksniff]

What the Republicans need to do, is tailor their policies - and their candidates- towards winning over people so they will vote for them, and thereby, win elections legitimately.

That would require having policies.

 

[BidudeinWi]

What the Republicans need to do, is tailor their policies - and their candidates- towards winning over people so they will vote for them, and thereby, win elections legitimately.

Now, though, What they are doing instead is courting the extremists, and trying to game the system, and when they lose, cry "Fraud!" and try to overturn elections instead of trying to actually win them legitimately. This is not how a representative democratic government should work.

I watched Kim Reynolds (Iowa governor)'s speech following Biden's earlier tonight. Her views are center-right for sure, but unlike, say, Marjorie Taylor Greene or Trump, she is someone who I could see as being electable. I agreed with some of what she said, and disagreed with some of it. She is the kind of candidate the Repubs need to run- because she would likely beat Biden legitimately due to popular support, without trying to game the system.

Ummm, Trump won handily in 2016 and 2020. But for the Democrap well oiled election fraud, DJT would be in office and Putin would be sucking his own thumb.

 

[phrodeau]

Ummm, Trump won handily in 2016 and 2020. But for the Democrap well oiled election fraud, DJT would be in office and Putin would be sucking his own thumb.

Your facts are alternative.

 

[BidudeinWi]

Your facts are alternative.

You’re delusional!

 

[PaxNurgle]

If you think Trump won the presidential election in 2020, then you are either living in an alternate universe, or a mental hospital.

Get a grip.

Seriously dude, just fucking stop already with that shit.

And AT BEST it proves exactly what I am talking about. Refusing to admit defeat like a fucking child, vs actually winning legitimately.